New interpretative center.

Make your voice heard!

Two community engagements sessions will be held on Nov. 20 to introduce the public to a new interpretive center being planned in conjunction with the Vicksburg National Military Park.

The project is a collaboration of the Mississippi Department of Archives and History (MDAH), the Friends of Vicksburg National Military Park & Campaign (FOV), and the National Park Service at the Vicksburg National Military Park.

"From these sessions, the public will have opportunities to learn about the partnership project, our goals, and engage with us as we move forward with the development of the new center," said Megan Bankston, Vicksburg project manager at MDAH.

By preserving and sharing the rich stories of the Vicksburg Campaign, the new interpretive center will connect visitors with a pivotal chapter in American history, exploring its legacy and its impact on the America we know today.

Feedback and comments are welcome at both public sessions.

• Nov. 20, at noon. Katie Blount, director of MDAH, will present "MDAH Project Updates" as part of the "History Is Lunch" series in the Craig H. Neilsen Auditorium of the Two Mississippi Museums in Jackson. The program will also stream live on the MDAH Facebook page and YouTube channel. Vicksburg project representatives from architecture firm Perkins&Will and exhibit design firm Gallagher & Associates will provide special project overviews.


• Nov. 20, at 5:30 p.m. The session will be held in the orientation theater at the Vicksburg National Military Park Visitor Center in Vicksburg. Vicksburg project representatives from architecture firm Perkins&Will and exhibit design firm Gallagher & Associates will provide project overviews.

The new interpretive center in Vicksburg has a projected 2028 opening.
I don't have confidence in the NPS giving a fair shake as far as interpretation goes. If I recall correctly they put up a statue to the black Union troops at the Siege of Vicksburg, only problem was, as Ed Bearss pointed out, there were no black Union troops at the Siege. Didn't matter to them then and it has only gotten worse since then.
 
I don't have confidence in the NPS giving a fair shake as far as interpretation goes. If I recall correctly they put up a statue to the black Union troops at the Siege of Vicksburg, only problem was, as Ed Bearss pointed out, there were no black Union troops at the Siege. Didn't matter to them then and it has only gotten worse since then.
The scope of interpretation by the park was expanded by Congress in 2006. There weren't USCT at the siege, but there were USCT in battles during the campaign and afterward garrisoning the city and nearby points.


The capture of Vicksburg opened the river and separated the Confederacy from many key resources needed to prosecute the war: Texas beef and nitrates, Louisiana salt and sugar. But the primary advantage gained was access to the manpower of the region for military recruiting and cotton production in the form of several hundred thousand freed slaves.

Given that Vicksburg was the first major military operation with the express goal of freeing the slaves and recruiting them into the ranks of the federal army, it seems a given that slavery and the USCT would be a major component of the interpretation.
 
Last edited:
There weren't USCT at the siege, but there were USCT in battles during the campaign and afterward garrisoning the city and nearby points.

Wasn't Millikens Bend one of the first times USCT were in combat?

I would like an expanded Vicksburg visitor center exhibit to also make some mention of Port Hudson. Yes, it is a state historic site. However, I bet there are a lot of people who have heard of Vicksburg and will visit it because it's a NPS site just off the interstate, but know nothing of Port Hudson - certainly not that USCT fought there.
 
I don't have confidence in the NPS giving a fair shake as far as interpretation goes. If I recall correctly they put up a statue to the black Union troops at the Siege of Vicksburg, only problem was, as Ed Bearss pointed out, there were no black Union troops at the Siege. Didn't matter to them then and it has only gotten worse since then.
It's all part of inclusion, I think. Black troops may not have been a part of the siege operations but they were part of the Battle at Milliken's Bend across the river in Louisiana. This was part of the overall Vicksburg campaign. We live in times where inclusion is part of the national battlefield framework, so thus the monument to the black soldiers.
 
My hope is that they will display lots of artifacts at the new Visitor Center Museum. Vicksburg was known for their artillery and I would love to see a good interpretive display of the artillery as well as the bullets used by the soldiers on both sides. The current museum, we can all agree, is totally inadequate to properly interpret the campaign for Vicksburg. My understanding is that this new museum will interpret the entire campaign plus the civilian experience. This is exciting. I can appreciate the fact that they are inviting the public to hear
 
Vicksburg was known for their artillery and I would love to see a good interpretive display of the artillery as well as the bullets used by the soldiers on both sides.

Other than permanent forts, I would imagine Petersburg and Charleston are the only places heavier artillery was used than at Vicksburg. Neither of those other two were true sieges, and both featured limited applications of siegecraft.

Siege warfare and sharpshooting are other topics that few, if any, other Civil War sites have exhibits about but which were a significant part of the Vicksburg story.

Vicksburg was the culmination of engineering concepts refined over hundreds of years in Europe, but about which most Americans are oblivious.
 
I logged in and watched. Interesting concept, bringing in visitors from light to darkness and back out into light again. I was curious about what period they would cover, since it was over 100 years before Vicksburg would see the light again 😂

I think I was 9 years old when the city resumed celebrating the 4th of July on a regular basis.

Not sure I quite "get" the columns up front representing the swamps around the city,
 
I logged in and watched
I watched it a little while ago and it was interesting and a few of the locals did ask some great questions but I'm not sure of ust how they are going to deal with some issues. Below is the link so all can watch it.

 
It's all part of inclusion, I think. Black troops may not have been a part of the siege operations but they were part of the Battle at Milliken's Bend across the river in Louisiana. This was part of the overall Vicksburg campaign. We live in times where inclusion is part of the national battlefield framework, so thus the monument to the black soldiers.
Isn't that actually counter inclusion? If the majority of troops were regular troops.....shouldn't the focus actually reflect that?

When devote time or space to people who weren't there......don't the ones who actually were there get slighted? Is there suddenly somehow a shortage of actual stories and incidents of soldiers that actually were there and involved?
 
The same presentation is at the Park tonight. More local people will be there.
I watched it a little while ago and it was interesting and a few of the locals did ask some great questions but I'm not sure of ust how they are going to deal with some issues. Below is the link so all can watch it.

.
 
The same presentation is at the Park tonight. More local people will be there.

.
That should be interesting as they have some MAJOR issues to deal with for the occupation and reconstruction aspect of the so called interpretation.
 
Would think adequately covering a 47 day siege on a 2500 acre NMP should take up alot of space.......much less if going to city reconstruction and postwar......

If wishing to include all the actions of the campaign......is it going to be the size of mall of America?:D otherwise would think they should try to remain focused on the actual park and events.
 
If I recall correctly they put up a statue to the black Union troops at the Siege of Vicksburg, only problem was, as Ed Bearss pointed out, there were no black Union troops at the Siege. Didn't matter to them then and it has only gotten worse since then.
I have given a number of talks at VNMP over the last few years, including at the Mississippi African American monument, as a chapter of my dissertation on the Army of Vicksburg deals with slaves connected to the army as pressed laborers and body servants. The monument features three black men, two in United States uniform and a third in civilian dress who represents, "...all Mississippians of African descent who participated in the Vicksburg Campaign." You wouldn't necessarily know it from Ed Bearss' campaign history, but slaves constructed, improved, and repaired fortifications at Vicksburg from May 1862 to the final moments of the siege—these men, including about a hundred employed by the Confederate Engineers under Samuel Lockett, were under fire from shot and shell for the duration of the siege, some were wounded, and a few were killed.

1732147908622.png
 
I have given a number of talks at VNMP over the last few years, including at the Mississippi African American monument, as a chapter of my dissertation on the Army of Vicksburg deals with slaves connected to the army as pressed laborers and body servants. The monument features three black men, two in United States uniform and a third in civilian dress who represents, "...all Mississippians of African descent who participated in the Vicksburg Campaign." You wouldn't necessarily know it from Ed Bearss' campaign history, but slaves constructed, improved, and repaired fortifications at Vicksburg from May 1862 to the final moments of the siege—these men, including about a hundred employed by the Confederate Engineers under Samuel Lockett, were under fire from shot and shell for the duration of the siege, some were wounded, and a few were killed.

View attachment 529295
Have you published your dissertation yet? Can I pay you for a copy?
 
Would think adequately covering a 47 day siege on a 2500 acre NMP should take up alot of space.......much less if going to city reconstruction and postwar......

If wishing to include all the actions of the campaign......is it going to be the size of mall of America?:D otherwise would think they should try to remain focused on the actual park and events.
The park already includes portions of Louisiana, Port Gibson, and Champion Hill with portions of Chickasaw Bayou and Raymond in the process of being added. The update to the park's mission included any relevant sites in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana.

I think Grindstone Ford is owned by the national park system as part of the Natchez Trace, not sure if there's any interpretation there.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top