Longstreet My arm is paralyzed

Stiles/Akin

Sergeant Major
Joined
Apr 1, 2016
Location
Atlanta, Georgia
"My arm is paralyzed; my voice that once could be heard all along the line, is gone; I can scarcely speak above a whisper; my hearing is very much impaired, and sometimes I feel as if I wished the end would come; but I have some misrepresentations of my battles that I wish to correct, so as to have my record correct before I die." -James Longstreet
LONGSTREET, James. From Manassas to Appomattox: Memoirs of the Civil War in America. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1896. Thick octavo, original pictorial red cloth.

26001186_10155920148596838_1190774523704698689_n.jpg

26112020_10155920153386838_5828288623698036028_n.jpg
 
Very interesting, I completely love the Preface to my edition:

" Immediately after the surrender of the Confederate armies engaged in the war between the states, General Lee undertook to write of the campaigns of the Army of Northern Virginia while under his command, and asked such assistance as I could give in supplying reports, despatches, and letters of his, the originals of which had been lost or destroyed. Under the impression that they could not be put to better use, such as were then in hand were packed and sent him. He gave up the work, and after a few years his death made it impossible that the world should ever receive the complete story of the Confederate campaigns in Virginia from the noble mind that projected and controlled them. Possibly, had I not expected our commander to write the history of those campaigns, I should have written it myself a decade or so earlier than I have done. But, personally, I am not sorry that I write of the war thirty years after its close, instead of ten or twenty.

While I am so constituted, temperamentally, that I could view then almost exactly as I do now the great struggle in which I bore a part, I do not know that others, in any considerable number might have so regarded it at the earlier periods to which I refer. I believe that now, more fully than then, the public is ready to receive, in the spirit in which it is written, the story which I present. It is not my purpose to philosophize upon the war, but I cannot refrain from expressing my profound thankfulness that Providence has spared me to such time as I can see the asperities of the great conflict softened, its passions entering upon the sleep of oblivion, only its nobler----if less immediate----results springing into virile and vast life.

I believe there is to-day, because of war, a broader and deeper patriotism in all Americans; that patriotism throbs the heart and pulses the being as ardently of the South Carolinian as of the Massachusetts Puritan; that the Liberty Bell, even now, as I write, on its Southern pilgrimage, will be as reverently received and as devotedly loved in Atlanta and Charleston as in Philadelphia and Boston. And to stimulate and evolve this noble sentiment all the more, what we need is the resumption of fraternity, the hearty restoration and cordial cultivation of neighborly, brotherly relations, faith in Jehovah and respect for each other; and God grant that the happy vision that delighted the soul of the sweet singer of Israel may rest, like a benediction upon the North and the South, upon the Blue and the Gray.

The spirit in which this work has been conceived, and in which I have conscientiously labored to carry out, is one of sincerity and fairness. As an actor in, and an eyewitness of, the events of 1861 thru 1865, I have endeavored to my humble share of duty in passing the materials of history to those who may give them place in the records of the nation,---not of the South nor of the North,----but in history of the United Nation. It is with such magnified view of the responsibility of saying the truth that I have written.

I yield to no one as a champion of the Southern soldier wherever he may have fought and in whatever army, and I do not think I shall be charged more now than in war-time with "underestimating the enemy," Honor to all! If I speak with some particularity of the First Corps of the Army of Northern Virginia, it must be ascribed in part to the affection of a commander, and in part to my desire to relieve its brave officers and men in the ranks from unjust aspersion. After General Lee's death, various writers on the Southern cause combined with one accord to hold the First Corps and its commander responsible for all adversity that befell the army. I being under the political ban, and the political passions and prejudices of the times running high, they had no difficulty in spreading their misrepresentations South and North Until some people, through their mere reiteration, came to accept them as facts. I simply present the facts concerning the First Corps in all fullness and fairness, attested by indisputable authorities that the public may judge between it and its detractors.

In the accounts of battles and movements, the official War Records supply in a measure the place of lost papers, and afford a great mass of most trustworthy statistics. I am under obligations to General E. P. Alexander, General G. M. Sorrel, Colonel Osman Latrobe, Colonel J. W, Fairfax, Colonel T. J. Goree, Colonel Erasmus Taylor, and Colonel J. C. Haskell for many interesting suggestions.

To Major George B. Davis and Mr. L. J. Perry, of the War Records office, I am under obligations for invaluable assistance; as also to Mr. Alfred Matthews, of Philadelphia, for material aid in revising the manuscript of these memoirs.

The Author"

I believe, regardless how flawed his memoirs may have been, his preface says exactly how the man felt and what was in his heart.
 
Last edited:
Something else I find impressive about this Preface. Longstreet had no choice (due to the loss of his own records) than to rely on the accounts of lessor officers. These officers all lived through and witnessed the character assacination their former commander had been subjected too. They all stepped up to the plate to help him. They literally helped the scourge of the South. Wouldn't it have been simpler for them to play ostrich and stick their heads in the sand. No, they came to his aid. What does that say?
 
As I see it he had many PR allies. In his own words. The repeated accusations became fact in the minds of the common uneducated laymen.
Why is Longstreet looked upon as a traitor to the Cause when John S. Mosby would be a much better Confederate to be labeled for such actions which he did and his personal relations with the Grant administration and even afterwards.Was this due to the writings of former officers ,Pickett or Early.?Was it due to his carrying out the disagreement on Lee 's orders or his delay to carry out such at Gettysburg when no one wanted to place the real blame on other officers who failed on the first two days,? I have not read of where he placed the failure of the battle on his commanding officer.Were there other noted officers who also went rogue and aided the Republican party or turned scalawag ?
 
Why is Longstreet looked upon as a traitor to the Cause when John S. Mosby would be a much better Confederate to be labeled for such actions which he did and his personal relations with the Grant administration and even afterwards.Was this due to the writings of former officers ,Pickett or Early.?Was it due to his carrying out the disagreement on Lee 's orders or his delay to carry out such at Gettysburg when no one wanted to place the real blame on other officers who failed on the first two days,? I have not read of where he placed the failure of the battle on his commanding officer.Were there other noted officers who also went rogue and aided the Republican party or turned scalawag ?
The Lost Cause advocates needed a scapegoat. Longstreet was a convenient choice. He had, according to them, caused Lee to lose at Gettysburg, which in their view was the turning point of the war. Then, after the war, he urged reconciliation, became a Republican and accepted government positions from the Republican Administration.
He made matters worse by honestly answering loaded questions about his service and the need for reconciliation. Had he remained silent, he might have escaped at least some of the wrath aimed at him.
Reading his writings, it is difficult to see where he "went rogue". He simply had a different view of his obligation and sworn duty after being paroled and, later, pardoned.
 
Why is Longstreet looked upon as a traitor to the Cause when John S. Mosby would be a much better Confederate to be labeled for such actions which he did and his personal relations with the Grant administration and even afterwards...
I would opine that Lt. Gen. Longstreet commanding the First Corps of the Army of Northern Virginia in many pivotal battles enjoyed a higher rank and therefore a much greater responsibility leading many more men than did Col. Mosby, no matter how great a partisan ranger he may have been.
 
"My arm is paralyzed; my voice that once could be heard all along the line, is gone; I can scarcely speak above a whisper; my hearing is very much impaired, and sometimes I feel as if I wished the end would come; but I have some misrepresentations of my battles that I wish to correct, so as to have my record correct before I die." -James Longstreet
LONGSTREET, James. From Manassas to Appomattox: Memoirs of the Civil War in America. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1896. Thick octavo, original pictorial red cloth.

View attachment 172204
View attachment 172205
That's certainly a beautiful edition - and apparently in excellent condition!
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top