Ironclad Muscogee Described

I couldn't get a high enough resolution to read that,
Augusta, Ga. Chronicle & Sentinel, August 10, 1864, page 1

A Formidable Confederate Ironclad Complete
By way of the North, we obtain the annexed account of a formidable ironclad, now laying at Columbus, Ga.:

For the past year, the agent of the Confederate Navy Department have been busily at work at Columbus, Georgia, in construction of an iron clad vessel, which they intend shall pay an important part in clearing the Florida waters of our fleet. This monster is now completed, and ready to engage in the work of destroying blockaders, or assisting in an attack upon our monitors, whenever Mr. Davis or Mallory shall give the word. The name of the vessel is the Muscogee. She is a light draft boat, notwithstanding the immense weight of her armor. Her dimensions are: Fifty-six feet beam; forth-two feet floor, flat bottomed. She has a center-wheel of a diameter of twenty-four feet. Like the Merrimac, Arkansas and Louisiana, and, in fact, all the rebel iron-clads and rams, that portion of her above water is angular in shape -- the rebels never having deviated from the rule adopted at the beginning of the war in regard to the construction of the exposed portions of their offensive vessels.
Like her predecessors, she is clad with railroad iron; but the bars are not attached, as were those of the earlier efforts of the Confederates in this line. Formerly it was customary to lay a roofing on their iron clads of common rails. Upon these another layer of inverted rails was placed, thus closing up the interstices. But it was found upon subjecting the vessels mailed in this manner to the ordeal of a cannonade, that the shot in striking loosened the upper layer, causing it to fly off. Therefore a change in the manner or armoring their vessels became necessary, and the rails are now rolled into bars two inches thick and four inches in breadth. Two of these bars are welded together, forming an armor four inches in thickness, which is placed upon their vessels. The Muscogee, as well as other late productions of Confederate naval ingenuity, is mailed in this manner. She is furnished with five or six high pressure river boats as tenders. These last are fortified with cotton bales. It is intended that this new iron monster shall come out of the Apilachicola river, to join Buchanan in a simultaneous attack against Farragut's fleet, now off Mobile. How far this programme will be changed, of course depends on circumstances.
 
It is intended that this new iron monster shall come out of the Apilachicola river, to join Buchanan in a simultaneous attack against Farragut's fleet, now off Mobile

Apalachicola to Mobile Bay...Thats going to be a 'fun' trip of about 200 nautical miles...

Cheers,
USS ALASKA
 
Apalachicola to Mobile Bay...Thats going to be a 'fun' trip of about 200 nautical miles...

Cheers,
USS ALASKA
May be less of a environmental problem than one might expect. On two consecutive summers, I took two week long naval training cruises from Galveston to Key West and back. Neither year was there any swell or any ripply from wind -- like sailing on glass. So such a trip was certainly possible.
 
Dimensions, method of armor, and coordination with Mobile's Buchanan.

Center of the page: https://gahistoricnewspapers.galileo.usg.edu/lccn/sn90052044/1864-08-10/ed-1/seq-1/
Hi Dave. Have you ever run across anything concerning whether this hull was ever launched or if the original propulsion had been assembled and tested? This particular Porter design has taken a real beating from critics over the years, but to the best of my knowledge an example built closely to the original specification was never demonstrated. The Missouri was very divergent from the Porter design. Some of the people on this board may have a copy of 'Naval Gray' with what seems to have been the original intended configuration of this class on the end covers. It makes me wonder if other modified versions were attempted.
 
May be less of a environmental problem than one might expect. On two consecutive summers, I took two week long naval training cruises from Galveston to Key West and back. Neither year was there any swell or any ripply from wind -- like sailing on glass. So such a trip was certainly possible.

Indeed sir, I must admit that was a consideration to my post...one of the others were the security issues. The fact that this was printed from sources '...by way of the North...' concerns me. No one is going to be surprised when she pops out of the mouth of the river...and did she carry enough coal to make a 200 nmi sortie? Just my random musings.

Cheers!
USS ALASKA
 
Hi Dave. Have you ever run across anything concerning whether this hull was ever launched or if the original propulsion had been assembled and tested? This particular Porter design has taken a real beating from critics over the years, but to the best of my knowledge an example built closely to the original specification was never demonstrated. The Missouri was very divergent from the Porter design. Some of the people on this board may have a copy of 'Naval Gray' with what seems to have been the original intended configuration of this class on the end covers. It makes me wonder if other modified versions were attempted.
I read Naval Gray when it came out, but have been following railroads since and have no info regarding your question.
 
Indeed sir, I must admit that was a consideration to my post...one of the others were the security issues. The fact that this was printed from sources '...by way of the North...' concerns me. No one is going to be surprised when she pops out of the mouth of the river...and did she carry enough coal to make a 200 nmi sortie? Just my random musings.

Cheers!
USS ALASKA
No idea about the coal load -- or the availability of that much good coal that late in the war. Several blockade stations were emptied in preparation for the Mobile operations, so departure might have been unobserved. Pensacola traffic would have been more of a problem.
 
Here is the "Muscogee" centre wheel plan as drawn by Robert Holcombe. John L Porter is accredited with the original design, apparently for construction at New Orleans.
CSS MUSCOGEE.jpg
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top