1SGDan
Major
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Location
- New Hampshire
Six years ago I received this book as a Christmas present. Because I had no real interest in this unit I placed it at the bottom of my extensive to read pile. Six years later and out of new material I picked up this book. I wish I would have left it were it was. What a piece of ****! Wert has some reputation as a CW historian but he cannot be proud of this. I struggled through a quarter of the book before I had to quit. The reasons:
1. Total lack of objectivity. To start with the cover screams that this unit is "the most famous command of the Civil War." Wert also fills the pages with superlatives about the commander and his men while ignoring the fact that they were also thieves and murderers. Their extralegal tactics were so well known in the Union ranks that Mosby was placed under a death sentence by Grant if captured. These go, for the most part, ignored
2. Their exploits and their effect on Union operations is grossly inflated by the author. As horse raiders, scouts and bridge burners they may have caused some concern in the Union chain of command but they ultimately has very little impact on overall Federal operations.
3. Finally, the editing is this book is among the worst I have seen in a book by a otherwise reputable publisher (Simon and Schuster). Mosby's name is spelled differently on different pages. Early in the book Mosby is noted as having 175 horsemen yet 30 pages later a command of 100 is called the largest he would ever lead.
The authors totally biased descriptions, glorifications, and reluctance to tell the whole truth about this unit makes this book almost worthless as a reference. I cannot bring myself to finish it. Which is a very rare thing for me to say about any CW book.
1. Total lack of objectivity. To start with the cover screams that this unit is "the most famous command of the Civil War." Wert also fills the pages with superlatives about the commander and his men while ignoring the fact that they were also thieves and murderers. Their extralegal tactics were so well known in the Union ranks that Mosby was placed under a death sentence by Grant if captured. These go, for the most part, ignored
2. Their exploits and their effect on Union operations is grossly inflated by the author. As horse raiders, scouts and bridge burners they may have caused some concern in the Union chain of command but they ultimately has very little impact on overall Federal operations.
3. Finally, the editing is this book is among the worst I have seen in a book by a otherwise reputable publisher (Simon and Schuster). Mosby's name is spelled differently on different pages. Early in the book Mosby is noted as having 175 horsemen yet 30 pages later a command of 100 is called the largest he would ever lead.
The authors totally biased descriptions, glorifications, and reluctance to tell the whole truth about this unit makes this book almost worthless as a reference. I cannot bring myself to finish it. Which is a very rare thing for me to say about any CW book.