Rebforever
Lt. Colonel
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2012
WHAT???"blockade and march down the Mississippi".
WHAT???"blockade and march down the Mississippi".
There never was such a think as an "Anaconda Plan". It is a post-facto invention. The name itself comes from a satirical cartoon lampooning Scott.
The Navy of course is going to blockade the coast, because that's what navies do.
Operational problems mean the Navy won't be mounting a full blockade until well into 1862 after the seizure of Port Royal.
Scott in his 3rd May writes to McClellan that his only planned operation is for 60,000 men (the regulars and the advance of the 3-years volunteers) to be carried on 40 transports escorted by 12-20 gunboats some time after 10th November 1861 (because according to Scott the 3 years volunteers who enlisted right at the start of the war won't be ready for the field until then). On the 21st he objects to McClellan's plans again and is suggesting 80,000 men going down the Mississippi on water and overland (the larger part of the force), again at the end of the year. In his 21st May letter Scott informally unites the Dept of Missouri and Dept of Kentucky with McClellan's own and makes him de facto commander of all western forces.
Quick correction here - Scott's Anaconda plan was to blockade and march down the Mississippi, without offensives across the Continent and relying almost entirely on economic pressure. McClellan's plan is how the war played out anyway, but in a disjointed sense.
Quick correction here: Scott unveiled the Anaconda Plan May 3rd, 1861 (preliminary) and May 21st (final). It was the outline for a 2-year war to defeat and conquer the Confederacy. Political, military and economic isolation via the blockade was certainly a big part of his plan. Your description leaves out Scott's fighting the war in the West by clearing the Mississippi River Valley first while the blockade strangled the Confederacy. The major objection made to Scott's plan was that two years was too slow.
"blockade and march down the Mississippi".
WHAT???
No, I am referring to the York and James rivers. You need those to have a way of supplying an army before Richmond that doesn't use rail supply via the site of the North Anna battles.
Well, yes, because that's how battles were fought in the American Civil War - at least, by large armies. It's not until the Loudoun Valley campaign that the Army of the Potomac first uses a flying column.
Wagon logistics, especially in the less developed US, was very bad indeed at allowing mobility.
The purpose of an advance to the west is to outflank the lines along the rivers. To answer your question about supply down at Richmond, you would first have to tell me what has transpired before that. Has the Confederate army simply fallen back to Richmond? Have they come out and fought the Union to the West while still holding on near Fredericksburg? What have they done?
Assume the worst. What can the Confederate army do to disrupt your approach?
One example is that the CS army falls back to the area of the North Anna battles, as your supply line must go through there to reach Richmond.
I have said that as part of this it seems likely the Union would have moved down the Shenandoah Valley, hopefully as far as Staunton. It seems likely this move starts earlier than (no later than the same time as) the move down the Eastern slope of the Blue Ridge. Clearly that means troops are out there and they came from somewhere. Generally speaking: Fremont's lot, Banks, etc. If it is to be waged first, probably more required; if at the same time as the main advance, probably fewer troops needed in the Valley.
Um... so you're advancing down both sides of the Blue Ridge at once? Doesn't that just mean the part of the army east of the Blue Ridge has no consistent supply route, because there's Confederate troops on top of it?
ED: having read further, you seem to mean moving to Gordonsville.
View attachment 157692 The maps are Plate 018 of the Official Records Atlas. The Cram map, on the left, was hastily prepared at McClellan's request by Major Thomas J. Cram of General Wool's staff using information they had obtained at the time. The right hand map was prepared under McClellan's orders after Federal troops had advance up the Peninsula. Major differences, especially in the line of the Warwick River.
From what I've read I can't say that I'm surprised that intelligence and maps of the Peninsula were lacking. With the exception of manning coastal fortifications most of the relatively small US Army was out west. There were outstanding topographical engineers (John Fremont, William Emory, George McClellan) laying out routes for future transcontinental railroads or (George Meade) conducting coastal surveys and building lighthouses. Until December, 1861, no one anticipated the need for detailed maps of inland areas. If you lived there you new where to go, if you didn't live there you probably didn't care.
OR Atlas Map of Northern Virginia follows:I don't think there really is a "worst". There are things the Confederates might do and you will have to do something in return.
The Rebels might decide to plunge towards Washington while the main Union army is a bit to the West. I don't think they would (I really doubt Joe Johnston would). Personally, I think the Union commander should like that one and react by turning against the Rebel flank and rear, hoping to defeat them, then drive them up against the Washington defenses and/or the Potomac. Pull that off and the Union will have a free hand in Virginia in the aftermath.
The Rebels might decide to stay in place East of your advance, which means you threaten their flank as you move. The natural thought here is that you turn East to hit their flank and rear, threatening their LOC, and see what develops.
Or the Rebels can pull back (likely, especially for Joe Johnston) to the Rapidan, and then the North Anna. About the time you are approaching Gordonsville for the Union, you have to make decisions about which way to proceed.
By this point, the Confederates have also had to make decisions. Are they concentrating to fight at Gordonsville to the West, or back to the East, closer to the RR from Richmond? Are they splitting into two forces or combining in one?
But all of this involves a lot of decisions. many made on the fly and in the hurly-burly of maneuver and combat.
In general, if this means the Union can take Gordonsville, then I suspect the Union would turn East and try to outflank the North Anna line.
Yes. Banks was already doing that in real life, moving down the Shenandoah to take Harrisonburg and New Market by March 20. when Jackson has retreated 20 miles to a flanking position at the gap on the Blue Ridge. Doing that secures the flank of the advance on the other side of the Blue Ridge, and Jackson won't be staying up there if another large Union force is not that far away behind him. The only difference here is that McClellan is deploying into northern VA in strength instead of moving his army to Fort Monroe.
If this was part of a plan, of course, things would be done a little different. Banks might have a little more strength and support until he got to that point, or he might be a little later coming down, to act in concert with an advance through Culpepper. Jackson will either be further down the Valley or on the East side of the Blue Ridge -- he won't be staying up at the Gap long with Banks on the Valley side and a Union advance moving towards the other side of the Gap (modern day, roughly where VA-33 crosses Skyline Drive).
Banks, BTW, found supply a little difficult when he got down as far as Harrisonburg and New Market. He'd need some help to get his logistics developed better for this plan. Freemont is out there to the west of the Valley, doing whatever Freemont does after he arrives (March 29?). I'd assume McClellan wanted him to come through McDowell to Staunton, arriving about May 8-15 (real-life battle at McDowell was May 8).
If Johnston wants to use Jackson and Ewell East of the Blue Ridge as McClellan advances, then Banks and Freemont have a free hand in the Valley. In that case, McClellan might pull Shields division back over the Blue Ridge (as Lincoln/Stanton did in real life).
The rest of your post I think we should leave aside until we work through the above parts. Let's try to work on how things might have gone up until about the middle of May, assuming that Confederate responses in troop transfers from outside the area would be about as they were in real-life, just re-arranged to deal with this advance.
I would guess that means (about May 15):
Does Joe Johnston:
- Banks has come down the Shenandoah from the North at least to Harrisonburg and New Market. LOC running back to Harpers Ferry.
- Freemont is approaching Staunton from the West. LOC long and difficult.
- Jackson and Ewell are East of the Blue Ridge
- McClellan's main army has advanced through Warrenton, Culpepper and maybe Orange, LOC largely the O&A RR
- Some Union force is over near Fredericksburg-Aquia Creek, LOC the RR back to Washington
- Joe Johnston is concentrated in one of:
- Along the North Anna with a smaller part at/near Gordonsville
- Near Gordonsville with a smaller force along the North Anna
- In two large wings, at Gordonsville and somewhere further East, near the RR
- LOCs here use the RRs back to Richmond
- Magruder and Huger are still back at Yorktown and Norfolk, possibly having detached some troops.
- Confederate RR to Charlottesville from the West threatened or cut by Freemont's advance.
- Attack McClellan?
- Send forces to the Valley to attack Freemont/Banks and stand in place at Gordonsville/North Anna?
- Stand in place at Gordonsville/North Anna and wait to see what happens?
- Retreat towards Richmond?
OR Atlas Map of Northern Virginia follows:
View attachment 157694
One thing to note is there is no direct rail communication between Washington DC and Fredericksburg VA or between Washington DC and Richmond VA. Federal operations on the Rappahannock in 1862, 1863 & 1864 used the spur of the RF&P Railroad running between Fredericksburg and Aquia Creek and steamers on the Potomac River as their LOC. Assuming a Federal advance out of DC along the route of the Orange and Alexandria, I cannot see why Johnston would abandon the Fredericksburg area. It would have left him well supplied from Richmond and on the flank of McClellan's line of advance. IMO there would have had to been a significant threat from the south or southeast to pry him away, which is in fact what happened during the Peninsula Campaign.
You'd also want to protect your LOC, which would probably require the type of precautions Sherman used later in 1864 to protect his LOC from St. Louis and Louisville through Nashville and Chattanooga to Atlanta; the equivalent in northern Virginia has the advantage of being shorter.
As to maintaining a large army at Fredericksburg: Lee's ANV was very hungry there in January-April 1863, so much so that Longstreet was sent to Suffolk to gather supplies and ease the burden at Fredericksburg. The Confederates essentially could not feed a large force sitting directly on the RR 50 miles from Richmond at that point (animals were a particular problem, leading to dispersal of artillery and cavalry). Some large force can be supplied there, but any really large force will have to be scattered more, possibly out towards Gordonsville and Orange C.H.
I think you misapprehend the difficulty of the operation.
Nope.
I think you misapprehend the difficulty of the operation.
Nope.
Why?
I was only trying to correct your misapprehensions.
Which are?
OR Atlas Map of Northern Virginia follows:
One thing to note is there is no direct rail communication between Washington DC and Fredericksburg VA or between Washington DC and Richmond VA. Federal operations on the Rappahannock in 1862, 1863 & 1864 used the spur of the RF&P Railroad running between Fredericksburg and Aquia Creek and steamers on the Potomac River as their LOC. Assuming a Federal advance out of DC along the route of the Orange and Alexandria, I cannot see why Johnston would abandon the Fredericksburg area. It would have left him well supplied from Richmond and on the flank of McClellan's line of advance. IMO there would have had to been a significant threat from the south or southeast to pry him away, which is in fact what happened during the Peninsula Campaign.
OR Atlas Map of Northern Virginia follows:
View attachment 157694
... Assuming a Federal advance out of DC along the route of the Orange and Alexandria, I cannot see why Johnston would abandon the Fredericksburg area. It would have left him well supplied from Richmond and on the flank of McClellan's line of advance. IMO there would have had to been a significant threat from the south or southeast to pry him away, which is in fact what happened during the Peninsula Campaign.
I agree.
Johnston moved back to the Rappahanock/Rapidan line and had eight divisions available to defend it.
Fredericksburg was under Holmes' command and then Longstreet's when Holmes was reassigned, They had the following around Fredericksburg:
Whiting's division of 3 bdes (Whiting, Hood and Hampton)
Holmes' division of 4 bdes (French, Walker*, Field and SR Anderson)
and were fortifying the heights behind Fredericksburg that cost Burnside so dear.
The other major corps was occupying the area around the O&ARR bridge across the Rapidan (having burned it and the one over the Rappahannock ISTR) and covering the fords with:
GW Smith's division (GT Anderson, Wilcox* and Toombs)
Longstreet's division of 3 bdes (AP Hill, DR Jones and Pickett, with DR Jones being senior and commanding the division in lieu of Longstreet's assuming a "corps")
Ewell's division (Elzey, Trimble and Taylor)
Early's division of 3 bdes (Early, Rodes and Kershaw)
DH Hill's new division assembled from two slack brigades (Griffith and GB Anderson)
Stuart's cavalry
On the flank is Jackson with his division.
Historically Jeff Davis was going nuts over Burnside and was pulling brigades from other stations to form an army to oppose him. He asked Joe Johnston for Longstreet and his division, but Johnston objected to losing his best division commander. Davis then had Walker and Wilcox pulled from Johnston, Cobb from Magruder and Gregg from SC to add to the NC forces.
Very quickly when McClellan started moving in April Cobb and Wilcox were ordered to Magruder and Gregg, Branch and JR Anderson from the NC force were sent to Northern Virginia where they formed "The Army of the North" with Field's brigade at Fredericksburg and nominally with Ewell's division.
If McClellan inclines to an attack on the Rappahannock/Rapidan line one suspects, Wilcox and Walker would be recalled, and Cobb, Gregg, Branch and JR Anderson's brigades would rapidly be sent north, along with Colston's and Pryor's from Norfolk. This would give Johnston 10 divisions to defend a secure river line.
Urbanna was nixed not by Lincoln etc. directly, but by the Corps Commanders. They thought landing at Urbanna was too dangerous and exposed with Johnston behind the Rappahannock. It was them who insisted on Fort Monroe and the Peninsula, which McClellan considered the weakest option. Indeed back in January he'd asked James Shields about Yorktown, and Shields had said it would take six weeks to reduce it and move on.
Because of this I don't see there being any support for a landing on the lower Rappahannock, and it's a grind down the railroads.