John N. Edwards Remembers Quantrill

Boonslick

Sergeant
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Location
The Boonslick area of Central Missouri
JNE.png
Quantril-3.jpg


John Newman Edwards (1839-1889) was a pro-confederate journalist who helped create the image of Jesse James as a heroic bandit. He was born on January 4, 1839, in Virginia and moved to Lexington, Missouri, around 1855. He was a soldier of the Confederacy during the civil war and served under Gen. Jo Shelby. Edwards wrote three important Missouri related civil war books: Shelby and His Men or the War in the West, Shelby's Expedition to Mexico: An Unwritten Leaf of the War and Noted Guerillas. Following his war years and a two year stay in Mexico, he returned to Missouri where he worked the reminder of his short life as a newspaper editor. In the May 16. 1872 edition of The Kansas City Times, a paper that he founded, appeared the following article.

++++++++


As the glorification of living and dead guerrillas seems now to be the order of the day, a few words as to the character of this, the king of guerrillas, may not be amiss. Since Mosby's recent interview with General Grant, the Radical papers declare that his sins, though as scarlet, shall be made white as snow. No good reason, therefore, exists why the truth shall not be told of one who, brave and steadfast to the end, died as he had lived, a fearless Ishmaeliie.

Richardson, whom McFarland killed, wrote once in a letter from Denver city to the New York Tribune, of Billy West, a noted border man, as "the swarthy Adonis of the Plains." Carrying forward the simile, Quantrill might be likened unto a blonde Apollo of the prairies. His eyes were very blue, soft and winning. Peculiar they were in this, that they never were in rest. Looking at the face, one might say there is the face of a student. It was calm, serene, going oftener to pallor than to laughter. It may be that he liked to hear the birds sing, for hours and hours he would linger in the woods alone. His hands were small and perfectly molded. Who could tell in looking at them that they were the most deadly hands with a revolver in all the border. Perhaps no man ever had more complete mastery over a horse than Quantrill, and whether at a furious gallop or under the simple swing of the route step, he could lean from the saddle and snatch a pebble from the ground.

Anderson was a tiger let loose ; Quantrill was a tiger too, that had the innocence of a lamb. Nature loves to group the grotesque. Hence all the smiles his features had on when his pitiless lips pronounced the death sentence. Todd mingled no melody with his murders ; Quantrill was heard to sing little snatches of song as the gray smoke rolled away from his pistol. Mosby delighted in surprises and disguises ; Quantrill published his name broadcast when the mood was on him, and blazed it along the route of his travels as if it were a cloud to cover him. He was unlike them all, just as he was greater than them all.

It is instructive sometimes to study the pictures the war painted. No nation furnishes a counterpart for guerrillas such as ours, except Spain. France had a few, but women tempted them and they were trapped and slain. These Missourians loved women, but the love lasted not beyond the bivouac. In the morning each heart was all iron. What instructs one in the contemplation of such characters, is their intense individuality. Horrified at their ferocity, one yet delights to analyze their organization. If there is a race born with- out fear, Quantrill belonged to it. He loved life, and yet he did not value it. Perhaps this is why it was so hard to lose it. In his war- life, which was one long, long, merciless crusade, he exhibited all the qualities of cunning, skill, nerve, daring, physical endurance, remorseless cruelty, abounding humor, insatiable revenge, a courage that was sometimes cautious to excess and sometimes desperate to temerity. In the midst of a band who knew no law but the revolver, his slightest wish was anticipated and obeyed. Hence his power to command was unquestioned. Recognizing no flag but the black flag, he sat as quietly down in the midst of a hostile country as the foes who were on his track ; and having shaken hands with death, he thought no more of the word surrender. If he believed in God, he denied the special providences of heaven, and stabled his horses in a church as well as in a stall. Without knowing the ghastly irony of it, perhaps, he was often heard to offer up a prayer for a victim.

It is useless to declare that these kind of characters do not attract. All Paris came to see Cartouche hung, and yet Cartouche was only a robber. But then his little child was suspended on the same scaffold. In the arsenal at Jefferson City is a picture of Bill Anderson, taken after death. The clear-cut face is ghastly pale A white, mute, appealing look is on the tense, drawn features. Dead leaves and sand are in the long yellow hair and tawny beard. For hours women gather about this picture and babble of balls and revels and dances and battles, and ever and ever come back to the white, set face and the wan, mute features. No visitor goes away without seeing it, and thinking of it for many a day thereafter.

No nation equals in individuality the American. Her people possess all the elements to make the finest soldiers on earth. Keen, desperate, enduring, insatiate for the excitement of active conflict, and readily hardened into reckless butchers, they make conscience subsidiary to slaughter, and accept the fortunes of a struggle with a fatalism that is Oriental. As a perfect type of this, Quantrill will live as a model. Sooner or later he knew death would come, and so he forgot him. Meanwhile his killing went on, and his exploits filled a historic page of the gigantic contest.

This California paper is too far away to know the truth of his last battle's ending. The curious can find his grave if they will look for it in Kentucky, deep enough to keep him till the judgment day. Bloodier and crueller than Mosby, he died as he had lived, worshiped by a few, loved by many, and abhorred of half of the nation.

From:
John N. Edwards-Life and Tributes; Jessie Edwards Publisher; (1889); pg. 69.


JNE Book.jpg
 
Last edited:
Interesting, thanks for sharing. Though I must admit I am once again reminded that one can't trust a thing said or especially written by Edwards...
 
Interesting, thanks for sharing. Though I must admit I am once again reminded that one can't trust a thing said or especially written by Edwards...
Hmmm don't think i've seen a modern book that doesn't list him as a source

Most historians acknowledge he was as biased as Connolly, but it remains hes one of the few who had firsthand access to many of his subjects.
 
For more information on Edwards, and his memorial book, see the thread "John Newman Edwards" (post # 5).

 
Interesting, thanks for sharing. Though I must admit I am once again reminded that one can't trust a thing said or especially written by Edwards...
I think it is more a matter of sifting through all the bombast to try to distill what is truth and what is romanticism. I believe a lot of what Edwards wrote was the truth as he understood it. A lot of it was the "truth" as he wished others to understand it. ...and almost all of it was dripping with this writing style.

The first Edwards book I ever read was "Shelby and His Men, or, The War in the West." It is remarkable for its detail and its factual record (Edwards was Shelby's Adjutant, and I'm sure he recorded a daily journal of events,) but it is a long, painful slog of a read due to Edwards's writing style.

Edwards was also Shelby's intelligence man, and I've read that his network of spies and informants was vast. I cannot remember the source for that. He was, by all accounts I've ever seen, an extremely competent officer. Unfortunately, by the time of his death he had been suffering from alcoholism for a long time.

Edwards is buried in the town cemetery in Dover, Missouri--just about two blocks south of Highway 24 and a dozen or so miles east of Lexington.
 
I think it is more a matter of sifting through all the bombast to try to distill what is truth and what is romanticism. I believe a lot of what Edwards wrote was the truth as he understood it. A lot of it was the "truth" as he wished others to understand it. ...and almost all of it was dripping with this writing style.

The first Edwards book I ever read was "Shelby and His Men, or, The War in the West." It is remarkable for its detail and its factual record (Edwards was Shelby's Adjutant, and I'm sure he recorded a daily journal of events,) but it is a long, painful slog of a read due to Edwards's writing style.

Edwards was also Shelby's intelligence man, and I've read that his network of spies and informants was vast. I cannot remember the source for that. He was, by all accounts I've ever seen, an extremely competent officer. Unfortunately, by the time of his death he had been suffering from alcoholism for a long time.

Edwards is buried in the town cemetery in Dover, Missouri--just about two blocks south of Highway 24 and a dozen or so miles east of Lexington.

Agree certainly dont see what in boonslick posted should be viewed as " that one can't trust a thing said or especially written by Edwards...". Certainly that Q and Anderson had female admirers seems a matter of record, both became married during the war....and certainly both had many admirers and detractor's during the war also seems a matter of record.....that were acknowledged as aggressive and master horsemen seems also a matter of record.......Ewing alleges as a reasoning for order no 11 the majority of the people supported the guerrillas....Not sure what is supposed to be unbelievable in what was posted or thats its all falsehoods as suggested if one cant believe "anything"...….such a statement suggests more a bias by the reader then the author......
 
Last edited:
I made it a point to add him to my visited graves list a few years ago.

View attachment 326582

Would add Stiles and Leslie seem to acknowledge a bias by edwards as pro south, but haven't seen them suggest the purposeful dishonesty of a Connelly to him...… Connelly would interveiw 20 classmates of Q, and if 19 said he was unordinary and a normal kid, and one said he was a inhuman fiend that tortured cats.......he would go with the one who supported his agenda and preconceptions instead of the 19 who refuted it.......
 
While I was searching for my picture of the Edwards grave site, I see that @Boonslick posted a link to a previous discussion, and it is one that I launched a few years ago. I had forgotten all about it. Sorry for the duplication.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top