- Joined
- Aug 25, 2012
John Bell had a very slim chance of becoming president in 1860. I have to wonder how he would have done as President. His only chance would be if he was the winner in a split electoral college. Bell was simply not pro slavery enough for the deep South. My take is the deep South still secedes if Bell is elected. The border states and Virginia do not secede at that time. Bell does nothing to stop the South from secedeing and becomes unpopular in the North and so lacks the power to pass laws protecting and expanding slavery. In the end Bell's hands off slavery and inability to protect and expand sllavery will not set Virginia and the border states. All will secede during his presidency.
I not sure if Bell was completely pro slavery or not. During the Civil War he did support the Confedery and was considered a "Rebel'. In 1860/61 a politician kind of had to choose sides. Bell choose slavery and the Confedery, but also choose to sit out the War. Bell was too pro slavery for the North, not pro slavery enough for the South.
I not sure if Bell was completely pro slavery or not. During the Civil War he did support the Confedery and was considered a "Rebel'. In 1860/61 a politician kind of had to choose sides. Bell choose slavery and the Confedery, but also choose to sit out the War. Bell was too pro slavery for the North, not pro slavery enough for the South.