This was a very controversial statue from the get-go. Horatio Greenough, the sculptor, received one of the first fine arts commissions from the US government to create it. The statue was to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Washington's birth (1832). It was completed in 1840 in the neoclassical style that was very popular at the time. It was designed to be on permanent display in the rotunda of the US Capitol. It remained there for only about 3 years because people were appalled by it. They felt it was extremely disrespectful to Washington. It was moved outside to the eastern plaza of the Capitol. A shed was built around it to protect it for the first winter, but that was seldom repeated and the statue suffered damage from the weather. It was moved again to the Patent Building and was there for a few years and then moved to the Smithsonian Castle in 1908 and underwent restoration. In 1964 it was moved to the Museum of History and Technology which is now the National Museum of American History. It's one of the statues Erin Thompson talks about in her book Smashing Statues: The Rise and Fall of America's Public Monuments. When she saw it, it was in an inconspicuous place back by a stairwell.
This was a very controversial statue from the get-go. Horatio Greenough, the sculptor, received one of the first fine arts commissions from the US government to create it. The statue was to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Washington's birth (1832). It was completed in 1840 in the neoclassical style that was very popular at the time. It was designed to be on permanent display in the rotunda of the US Capitol. It remained there for only about 3 years because people were appalled by it. They felt it was extremely disrespectful to Washington. It was moved outside to the eastern plaza of the Capitol. A shed was built around it to protect it for the first winter, but that was seldom repeated and the statue suffered damage from the weather. It was moved again to the Patent Building and was there for a few years and then moved to the Smithsonian Castle in 1908 and underwent restoration. In 1964 it was moved to the Museum of History and Technology which is now the National Museum of American History. It's one of the statues Erin Thompson talks about in her book Smashing Statues: The Rise and Fall of America's Public Monuments. When she saw it, it was in an inconspicuous place back by a stairwell.
I don't think the sculptor meant the statue to be disrespectful. I think he misjudged how popular (or not) an element of neoclassical art would be in America. The style was very popular at the time, but while it might be OK for Alexander the Great or the Caesars (not to mention Greek and Roman gods and goddesses) to be shown semi-nude, a semi-nude Washington was not going to fly in the US. In the present day, I don't think John Belushi and the toga party in Animal House is doing the statue any favors. An important part of the statue that we're not looking at because we're all distracted by the semi-nudity and the large foot, is that Washington is holding the sword with the handle out. He is willingly giving up power, something a god or king would not typically do. This is highly respectful to Washington.
The Apotheosis of Washington, whereby George rises into Olympus to take the place of Zeus at the head of the Pantheon, was a popular conceit at one time. The nudity was incidental:
The Apotheosis of Washington, whereby George rises into Olympus to take the place of Zeus at the head of the Pantheon, was a popular conceit at one time. The nudity was incidental: View attachment 543948View attachment 543951
Later on, he welcomed Abe to join him: View attachment 543949[now, behave yourselves!]
I don't… do colouring books, I only draw and even if I did do colouring books I would never in a million years make it Jeff Davis (I can't tell if that reply was a joke or not)
Good eye! We've been told its bigger due to the angle at which the statue was to be displayed. But that never did make sense to me. Seems since the foot is closer to the eye, it would be smaller, not larger, but who knows?
This was a very controversial statue from the get-go. Horatio Greenough, the sculptor, received one of the first fine arts commissions from the US government to create it. The statue was to commemorate the 100th anniversary of Washington's birth (1832). It was completed in 1840 in the neoclassical style that was very popular at the time. It was designed to be on permanent display in the rotunda of the US Capitol. It remained there for only about 3 years because people were appalled by it. They felt it was extremely disrespectful to Washington. It was moved outside to the eastern plaza of the Capitol. A shed was built around it to protect it for the first winter, but that was seldom repeated and the statue suffered damage from the weather. It was moved again to the Patent Building and was there for a few years and then moved to the Smithsonian Castle in 1908 and underwent restoration. In 1964 it was moved to the Museum of History and Technology which is now the National Museum of American History. It's one of the statues Erin Thompson talks about in her book Smashing Statues: The Rise and Fall of America's Public Monuments. When she saw it, it was in an inconspicuous place back by a stairwell.
Pretty much spot on! Moving it from the Rotunda was actually first raised by the artist, as he felt the light in the Rotunda did not do justice to his work. Since Congress pretty much hated it, they lept at his suggestion, and had it moved out to the Capital East Plaza, like you say. Greenough, while American, made the statue in Italy where he was learning his craft, and Classicism was very popular in Europe at the time. But like you say, not so much here. Its actually inspired by a famous statue of Zeus that was one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.