Thanks for posting in the Medical Care Forum
@major bill
Hopefully our resident psychologist (or is it psychiatrist?)
@amweiner will be along to weigh in on your post.
Wow. I had never heard of this unfortunate incident. Do you know if William L McMillen received any punishment? Was he court martialed?
Thanks for letting me know about this,
@lelliott19 - I didn't see the OP with all the NYE prep going on!
Thanks to
@major bill for bringing up an important topic, as well. It was relevant during the Civil War and remains important now in terms of how we treat both visible - and invisible - wounds of war.
Anyway, as you probably know, "insanity" in modern times is a legal rather than a psychiatric concept. During the 19th century, it made for a good catchall for anyone dealing with mental health symptoms: depression, thought disorders, mood disorders, anxiety, even the behavioral effects from brain injury - you name it - would be considered insanity back then because doctors didn't have the diagnostic language to understand it. Perhaps even more importantly, no one had any idea that combat and trauma could actually trigger such symptoms where they might not have existed previously. The concepts of combat fatigue and acute stress reaction were unknown, although the term "cannon fever" crops up here and there.
But to set aside the cold, clinical side of things for a moment, I encourage people to think about the conditions men endured during the war: marching, barely sleeping and running on primarily caffeine, the stress of combat (for example, the almost nonstop combat in the Overland Campaign), watching friends die and watching your unit get decimated. What does that do to the human psyche? The short answer is, nothing good. The mind needs ways to understand this nonstop stimulation and trauma, and without it, our ability to cope and control becomes limited very quickly. Not to excuse what McMillen did, but it's possible he just reached a limit of what he could stand, and lost all control. Sadly, a possibly traumatized individual handled his experiences by inflicting trauma on another - it's not uncommon, even today.
On another note, I read a passage in
A Stillness At Appomattox by Bruce Catton that suggested during late 1863 and through 1864, substitute brokers would indeed enlist people with pretty obvious cognitive and emotional impairments. If you were a warm body, you might well end up in the army regardless, and Catton suggested that more than a few doctors (whose job it was to weed people out during the initial exam) were bribed to accept people who had no business being out of the 1860s equivalent of supervised care.
I don't know if any of this was useful, but hope so....just some thoughts on an interesting, heartbreaking topic.
Adam