I Hear Richmond's Bells Ringing

Status
Not open for further replies.
To whom does the line "Our land was a paradise " refer ? The planter class ? The wealthy merchant class ? Certainly not to the enslaved or the working poor . You are entitled to your beliefs but a paradise seems to be a reach .
Actually, relatively speaking, after Sherman and company got finished with dutifully "beautifying" parts of the South leaving naked chimney's in his wake anything would be a paradise compared to that.

An editorial printed in the Philadelphia Inquirer cheered on Sherman's plan to wage war against defenseless noncombatants, rejoicing at "the fate of that accursed hotbed of treason." General Sherman himself regarded secessionists as traitors and wrote that the state "deserves all that seems in store for her."

In a letter to Major R.M. Sawyer dated January 31,1864, the general declared his belief that the war was the result of a "false political doctrine," namely, "that any and every people have a right to self-government." In the same letter (published in The Rebellion Record in 1865), Sherman contended that the Federal government could rightfully take the property, and even the life, of anyone who did not submit to its authority, and he complained that it was the "political nonsense of slave rights, State rights, freedom of conscience, freedom of press, and other such trash" that had "deluded the Southern people into war."

In January 1865, Sherman's forces gathered at Beaufort, South Carolina, and during that month a few of his brigades moved a little farther inland. By the first of February, the main advance was underway. Divided into two wings, one under the command of General Oliver 0. Howard, the army began to cut a wide path of destruction across South Carolina from the coast to the North Carolina border, burning farms, plantations and towns (including the capital city of Columbia); demolishing railroad lines; destroying or confiscating crops and livestock; and plundering and abusing civilians, reducing them to hopelessness and destitution. One of Shermans aides, Captain George W. Pepper, recorded his memories of the march through South Carolina in his memoir, published in 1866:

[H]ouses were burned as they were found. Whenever a view could be had from high ground, black columns of smoke were seen rising here and there within a circuit of twenty or thirty miles.
Solid built chimneys were the only relics of plantation houses after the fearful blast had swept by. The destruction of houses, barns, mills, &c., was almost universal. Families who remained at home, occasionally kept the roof over their heads.


Sherman's armies met with little in the way of military opposition from the relatively small number of Confederate forces in the state, who were compelled to withdraw and burn bridges behind them as a force of more than sixty thousand Union troops relentlessly moved inland.

In 1865, Major George W. Nichols, an aide-de-camp to General Sherman, published a book about the campaign in Georgia and South Carolina, revealing his contempt for the people of South Carolina, whom he dehumanized as "the scum, the lower dregs of civilization. They are not Americans; they are merely South Carolinians." Nichols thought that the thievery committed against civilians (usually women and old men) by his soldiers was amusing. After describing how the soldiers would search out valuables that had been hidden away by civilians, he added, "These searches made one of the pleasant excitements of our march."

The soldiers sent out as foragers, usually in advance of the main army, were some of the worst offenders in terms of pillaging and other wrongdoing. These men were called "bummers." In his book Merchant of Terror; author John B. Walters described them as "brigands and desperadoes" who operated virtually free of any military discipline or restraint.

Of Sherman's accomplishments in South Carolina, Major Nichols went on proudly:

History will in vain be searched for a parallel to the scathing and destructive effect of the invasion of the Carolinas. Aside from the destruction of military things, there were destructions overwhelming, overleaping the present generation... agriculture, commerce, cannot be revived in our day. Day by day our legions of armed men surged over the land, over a region forty miles wide, burning everything we could not take away. On every side, the head, center and rear of our columns might be traced by columns of smoke by day and the glare of flames by night. The burning hand of war pressed on these people, blasting, withering.


Another Federal officer, Major James A. Connolly, wrote home to his wife that halfway through the march in South Carolina, he was "perfectly sickened by the frightful devastation our army was spreading on every hand." He described the army's actions as "absolutely terrible" and reported how most houses were first plundered and then burned, and women, children and old men were turned out into the "mud and rain." He told his wife that he knew the campaign against South Carolina would be a terrible one before it began, but he had no idea "how frightful the reality would be."

John J. Hight, a chaplain of the Fifty-eighth Indiana Infantry Regiment, wrote in his diary, "Sometimes the world seemed on fire. We were almost stifled by smoke and flames." On March 7,1865, Sherman's second in command, General O.O. Howard, wrote to another officer that "General Blair reports that every house on his line of march today was pillaged, trunks broken open, jewelry, silver &c, taken."

Historian Joseph T. Glatthaar, author of an award-winning book on Sherman's campaign in Georgia and the Carolinas, stated that the Federal army burned the capital city of Columbia (just as it had also torched a number of towns on its way to it) and that most of Sherman's soldiers admitted that they would do it. The Columbia correspondent for the New York Herald newspaper reported in an article submitted on June 21, 1865, "There can be but little doubt that the destruction of Columbia was the work of our army."

...

In his travels with Sherman's army, reporter David P Conyngham had seen much destruction in Georgia, but when he gave his general impression of the operations in South Carolina, he stressed how much worse was than Georgia:

We marched, on the whole, four hundred and fifty miles, our wings extending some thirty-five or forty miles. This would give an area of over fifteen thousand square miles which we operated over, all the time supporting men and animals on the country. Indeed, the loss we inflicted on the enemy is incalculable, and all at a trifling sacrifice of life...

As for the wholesale burning, pillage, devastation, committed in South Carolina, magnify all I have said of Georgia fifty fold, and then throw in an occasional murder, "just to bring an old, hard-fisted cuss to his senses," and you have a pretty good idea of the whole thing.
-- Stokes, Karen. South Carolina Civilians in Sherman's Path, Introduction, pp 9-14,17.
 
Last edited:
I disagree on the slavery issue. But I don't really want to go through the Scriptures and show what really happened about the Egyptian slavery. But if you read it God did not force abolition on Egypt but rather He took away Egypt's Hebrew slaves and made them His servants/slaves The real kicker what stands out to me is that after coming out of Egypt the Word who was the Spokesman of God (who later came in the flesh as Jesus Christ) told Moses that Israel could have slaves from the heathen around them and these slaves could be passed on down as inheritance to their children. So abolition was not in play with Egypt. God merely took the Hebrew slaves away from Egypt and made them His servants/slaves. I know most will disagree but that's okay. This abolition thing has been beaten into everyone's brain. Who am I to dare to stand against the world.
"Whenever I hear any one, arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally." -Abraham Lincoln.
 
Last edited:
Me too. I hear them too:

1689625901988.jpeg


1689625929057.jpeg


1689625974544.jpeg


All the bells were ringing.
 
And I'm sure a lot of us can think of a few nice ones to add to yours - but I'm not into victimization, whether it's real or just imagined.
Actually, I have been rethinking the verses in the "Battle Hymn of the Republic" and I am coming to see that the He/Him in those verses are actually referring to none other than General William Tecumseh Sherman. I have seen him in the fires of a hundred burning Southern plantations.
 
Last edited:
Yes , Sherman was hard on South Carolina . I wonder why ?
Could it be Sherman's insanity?

He was away from being under the direct supervision of a mentally stable officer. He went wild.

"General Grant is a great general. I know him well. He stood by me when I was crazy, and I stood by him when he was drunk; and now, sir, we stand by each other always."
-- Union General William T. Sherman, "Our Great Captains" by Linus Brockett (1865), p.162.
 
I think you can find a cure on Youtube for that. They usually start out by saying "Doctors are stunned..." or something similar to that...
I do not mean to attack your personal religious beliefs.I am a believer in freedom of religion. In my opinion some of your facts are wrong. Another very religious person who had very contrary beliefs was John Brown . He saw himself as an instrument of God and believed he had an obligation to end slavery.
 
Could it be Sherman's insanity?

He was away from being under the direct supervision of a mentally stable officer. He went wild.

"General Grant is a great general. I know him well. He stood by me when I was crazy, and I stood by him when he was drunk; and now, sir, we stand by each other always."
-- Union General William T. Sherman, "Our Great Captains" by Linus Brockett (1865), p.162.
Sherman had his breakdown in 1861 but recovered. His manner of ending the war was to confiscate or destroy anything that could benefit the Confederate army. This included railroads.factories , plantations. livestock , crops etc. Farm houses that hadn't been abandoned we're usually spared. Sherman had lived in the south😂
 
Sherman had his breakdown in 1861 but recovered. His manner of ending the war was to confiscate or destroy anything that could benefit the Confederate army. This included railroads.factories , plantations. livestock , crops etc. Farm houses that hadn't been abandoned we're usually spared. Sherman had lived in the south😂
Sorry. I hit the wrong key on my phone.At my age it's hard to hit those little letters . He was a fan of the south but fought fiercely to end the war that was started there.
 
I do not mean to attack your personal religious beliefs.I am a believer in freedom of religion. In my opinion some of your facts are wrong. Another very religious person who had very contrary beliefs was John Brown . He saw himself as an instrument of God and believed he had an obligation to end slavery.
Well, you know the rules. If you can't defend your beliefs because you are not allowed to then why bring what you perceive as my personal beliefs up to begin with? Think about it. Because I am not allowed to give a real answer but just respond in a vague way. I am trying to follow the rules.
 
Sorry. I hit the wrong key on my phone.At my age it's hard to hit those little letters . He was a fan of the south but fought fiercely to end the war that was started there.
Can you imagine General Robert E. Lee doing to the North what General Sherman did to the South? I can't. I think Gen.WTS was insane no matter how much others try to defend what he did.
 
Can you imagine General Robert E. Lee doing to the North what General Sherman did to the South? I can't. I think Gen.WTS was insane no matter how much others try to defend what he did.
I don't defend everything he did. His job was to destroy the Confederate army and do his part to end the war. Dragging out the war even longer may have lead to even more damage to the south. Was it acceptable to have even more men killed and more resources destroyed to prolong the war ?
 
In the beauty of the lilies Christ was born across the sea,
With a glory in His bosom that transfigures you and me,
As He died to make men holy, let us die to make men free,
Our God is marching on!
 
I think the conversation is getting to
I don't defend everything he did. His job was to destroy the Confederate army and do his part to end the war. Dragging out the war even longer may have lead to even more damage to the south. Was it acceptable to have even more men killed and more resources destroyed to prolong the war ?
Military: yes. Civilians, farms, infrastructure: no.

Well, this is sort of getting off-topic and I am guilty as others too. So, I think I better cease posting unless it involves trying to write a Jeremiah lament for the South or music in general.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top