kevikens
2nd Lieutenant
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Location
- New Jersey
I understand that Robert E. Lee is one of the most interesting characters in Civil War History. And part of that fascination is why he was unable, talented as he was, to win the war for the South. From time to time I have read authors allude to Lee's health, often when in critical moments, creating problems for the commander in carrying out his command role. Certainly I can imagine gut churning dysentery making it hard for me to do anything away from a privy.
I don't know if anyone has made a study of this but just exactly how sick was Lee, especially late in the war? Was he suffering from the first symptoms of heart disease? Did he suffer from malaria? Dysentery? Intestinal parasites? Hookworm? Pellagra? He certainly looks healthy enough in photos taken circa 1860, but by 1865 he looks like FDR at Yalta. And were there any decisions he made that adversely affected the Army of Northern Virginia that can be traced to his being too ill to make the right calls? It's fascinating to think that what caused the Confederate defeat at Gettysburg may have been little more than amoeba.
I don't know if anyone has made a study of this but just exactly how sick was Lee, especially late in the war? Was he suffering from the first symptoms of heart disease? Did he suffer from malaria? Dysentery? Intestinal parasites? Hookworm? Pellagra? He certainly looks healthy enough in photos taken circa 1860, but by 1865 he looks like FDR at Yalta. And were there any decisions he made that adversely affected the Army of Northern Virginia that can be traced to his being too ill to make the right calls? It's fascinating to think that what caused the Confederate defeat at Gettysburg may have been little more than amoeba.