Feral Hogs Feasting on the Dead

JeopardyPhD

Cadet
Joined
Jul 31, 2025
I love the Shiloh NMP's Misinformation Monday Facebook series. Today, they debunk Angel's glow after the battle.

This reminds me of another grotesque casualty-related thing that has stuck in my head. As a kid, I had one of those comic books of the battle (I think there were others on Gettysburg, etc.). The comic book showed a scene of a hog eating a body that was backlit by a lightning strike.

To my knowledge, this scene came from Wiley Sword's claim that feral hogs fed upon casualties during the stormy night of April 6th to 7th (I think supposedly from the diary of a Confederate soldier). The fact that there weren't more accounts of this (and this would have been noteworthy) make me a bit skeptical this actually occurred.

Also, this happening amid the lightning flashes of the storm just seems a bit too forced (like setting up the scene of a horror movie). Certainly, there were real enough horrors on the field, but the fact that this wasn't documented by others-- or documented on the decidedly less stormy night of April 7th, makes me think it's a lurid, literary embellishment. There were many other accounts of the storm (lightning illuminating the battlefield), of macabre casualty-related events, of the Lexington and Tyler's artillery bombardment, and of small ammunition fires-- but nothing really on the feral hogs.

Does anyone have more evidence that this actually occurred?
 
I love the Shiloh NMP's Misinformation Monday Facebook series. Today, they debunk Angel's glow after the battle.

This reminds me of another grotesque casualty-related thing that has stuck in my head. As a kid, I had one of those comic books of the battle (I think there were others on Gettysburg, etc.). The comic book showed a scene of a hog eating a body that was backlit by a lightning strike.

To my knowledge, this scene came from Wiley Sword's claim that feral hogs fed upon casualties during the stormy night of April 6th to 7th (I think supposedly from the diary of a Confederate soldier). The fact that there weren't more accounts of this (and this would have been noteworthy) make me a bit skeptical this actually occurred.

Also, this happening amid the lightning flashes of the storm just seems a bit too forced (like setting up the scene of a horror movie). Certainly, there were real enough horrors on the field, but the fact that this wasn't documented by others-- or documented on the decidedly less stormy night of April 7th, makes me think it's a lurid, literary embellishment. There were many other accounts of the storm (lightning illuminating the battlefield), of macabre casualty-related events, of the Lexington and Tyler's artillery bombardment, and of small ammunition fires-- but nothing really on the feral hogs.

Does anyone have more evidence that this actually occurred?
Wouldn't the hogs have been cautious with the sudden advent of thousands of soldiers present in the area? And I think the battlefield was cleaned up as soon as possible.
 
I love the Shiloh NMP's Misinformation Monday Facebook series. Today, they debunk Angel's glow after the battle.

This reminds me of another grotesque casualty-related thing that has stuck in my head. As a kid, I had one of those comic books of the battle (I think there were others on Gettysburg, etc.). The comic book showed a scene of a hog eating a body that was backlit by a lightning strike.

To my knowledge, this scene came from Wiley Sword's claim that feral hogs fed upon casualties during the stormy night of April 6th to 7th (I think supposedly from the diary of a Confederate soldier). The fact that there weren't more accounts of this (and this would have been noteworthy) make me a bit skeptical this actually occurred.

Also, this happening amid the lightning flashes of the storm just seems a bit too forced (like setting up the scene of a horror movie). Certainly, there were real enough horrors on the field, but the fact that this wasn't documented by others-- or documented on the decidedly less stormy night of April 7th, makes me think it's a lurid, literary embellishment. There were many other accounts of the storm (lightning illuminating the battlefield), of macabre casualty-related events, of the Lexington and Tyler's artillery bombardment, and of small ammunition fires-- but nothing really on the feral hogs.

Does anyone have more evidence that this actually occurred?
Here is a post war newspaper article that mentions the hogs.

graves.jpeg
 
Thank you for the newspaper articles. I don't doubt that dogs, hogs, and other animals may have disinterred bodies after the battle-- I'm just more skeptical that this occurred during the fighting with 40,000 or more men around. It's also interesting that the first article has the dates of the battle wrong. Both articles seem to have sort of an op-ed flavor to them with the end goal of raising money for burials/monuments.
 
The Argus article seems particularly lurid (considering the source, I shouldn't be surprised).
Mentioning Union soldiers taking teeth as trophies? The possibility of people using skulls as drinking cups?

The hog angle fits nicely into their persuasive attempt-- the graves are in bad shape, there are Union sympathizers all over who might desecrate the Confederate graves (sidebar into an impassioned speech about Southern rights), and even if you are a "Union man," you should still donate to the cause. You can see how the angle was to get any Southern-sympathizing Memphian's blood to boil.

Also, plenty of factual errors (Gladden's death being near the close of the battle?) sprinkled in
 
"I remember that as we were crossing there was a rebel sharpshooter on the Fredericksburg side, who had annoyed us very much with his pestiferous shots. Naturally when we got on top the bank we ran up to look for this chap.

We came upon a rebel lying there with his eyes closed, and just breathing. He had been disemboweled, apparently by a shell. And there was a hog, one of the wild kind common in the South, who had been sniffing round, and had begun to eat him.

We forgot old scores in that sad sight, and, in the interest of humanity, one of our boys shot the hog."



Source: page 85
 
Thanks for ruining my breakfast, I was about to have some bacon🥓:cry:😵😵‍💫🤢🤮
Well now, if that was bacon from a Midwestern-raised hog, then you shouldn't worry. According to a Civil War environmental history book I read, Midwestern farmers tended to fence the livestock and feed them from the farm crop (think more like a modern-day feedlot) whereas Southern farmers tended to fence their crops and let the livestock run wild to fend for itself. This is why Midwestern-raised hogs tended to be larger with more and better quality meat. :hungry: Given that pork was the protein of choice in the South and Southern states were already importing it from Midwestern (soon to be Union) states by 1860, it makes me wonder why messing with your food supply by leaving the Union was considered a good idea.
 
I love the Shiloh NMP's Misinformation Monday Facebook series. Today, they debunk Angel's glow after the battle.

This reminds me of another grotesque casualty-related thing that has stuck in my head. As a kid, I had one of those comic books of the battle (I think there were others on Gettysburg, etc.). The comic book showed a scene of a hog eating a body that was backlit by a lightning strike.

To my knowledge, this scene came from Wiley Sword's claim that feral hogs fed upon casualties during the stormy night of April 6th to 7th (I think supposedly from the diary of a Confederate soldier). The fact that there weren't more accounts of this (and this would have been noteworthy) make me a bit skeptical this actually occurred.

Also, this happening amid the lightning flashes of the storm just seems a bit too forced (like setting up the scene of a horror movie). Certainly, there were real enough horrors on the field, but the fact that this wasn't documented by others-- or documented on the decidedly less stormy night of April 7th, makes me think it's a lurid, literary embellishment. There were many other accounts of the storm (lightning illuminating the battlefield), of macabre casualty-related events, of the Lexington and Tyler's artillery bombardment, and of small ammunition fires-- but nothing really on the feral hogs.

Does anyone have more evidence that this actually occurred?
I think I had that comic book, too. It's been a long time, but I think it was a Classics Illustrated - one of their one-off special ones that cost a whopping 25 cents.
 
The sheer number of hogs raised in the Southern United States in the 19th Century staggers the imagination. For example:

"Cincinnati, at the confluence of four rivers, pigs from across the country would arrive on foot in streaming droves of hundreds and sometimes thousands, swineherds trudging enormous lengths get their livestock to market before the snows set in. In 1836, this seasonal rush from Kentucky alone saw 82,000 pigs pass through North Carolina's Cumberland gap, many of them on their way to 'Porkopolis.' Other animals came along too, but the volumes paled in comparison. In 1847, one of the Gap's toll gates recorded 692 sheep, 898 cattle, 1,317 horses, and 51,753 hogs."

Hogs, turkeys & ducks were herded to market on great droves every fall. Absent refrigeration, delivering live animals to market was the only way it could be done.

IMG_0110.webp

This is the eastern half of the map that Sherman used to plot the March to the Sea.

IMG_2850.webp

In this detail, the 1860 Census data for every county is listed. Note the phenomenon number of swine.

Having established that millions of hogs came to market every fall, the question rises. What form of husbandry was typical.

Link


*

Emerging Civil War Gettysburg hogs eat bodies. Read more here.

Link


*
Link


*

Link

 
Last edited:
I love the Shiloh NMP's Misinformation Monday Facebook series. Today, they debunk Angel's glow after the battle.
Oh, I missed this! I'm glad they came out with something. Several of us here tried to find contemporary accounts but couldn't find anything earlier than the 90s.
 
Oh, I missed this! I'm glad they came out with something. Several of us here tried to find contemporary accounts but couldn't find anything earlier than the 90s.

ANGEL GLOW may be apocryphal, however…

1782139260389.webp

Foxfire bioluminescent fungus.

Anybody who doesn't know that bioluminescent fungus glows in the dark has never camped out in Tennessee's woodlands. At Picket State Park there are Glow Worm Tours of luminous fungi. We even have synchronized fireflies that wink on & off together. Read more here.

Link


Link


Link


Link


In 2001 potential source for Angel Glow identified. Read more here,

Link

 
Wouldn't the hogs have been cautious with the sudden advent of thousands of soldiers present in the area? And I think the battlefield was cleaned up as soon as possible.
We have hogs in Florida. They are pretty... shall we say they don't care about much. But they're so vicious, I would have assumed that both armies woukd have been in accord firing at them.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top