Disease in the ACW

diddyriddick

Sergeant Major
Joined
May 15, 2008
Location
NC.
We've all read or seen that the reason for greater southern susceptibility to disease was their lack of exposure to the dysentery, typhoid etc; the thinking goes that northerners, being exposed to more people, developed better resistance.

One thing that I've recently learned is that the immnune system is one of the first things to suffer when somebody is malnourished. So my question becomes....has anybody seen any sources on the effect of the acknowleged inferior southern diet on the suppression of their immune system?

Hope the question makes sense.
 
Hi David -

Interesting question. I haven't yet seen anything on the poor diet/immune system relationship...but it seems to make sense.

The one thing I would add - maybe by way of a question - is that dysentery, typhoid, etc., to my understanding are not diseases that can be immunized against. Typhoid and dysentery are the result of contaminated water etc., and would affect anyone injesting the contaminated food/water.

To that end, I wonder if the statistics on dysentery and typhoid run about the same (North/South)...but the statistics on things like measles, etc. (i.e., 'childhood diseases'), would show the Union soldiers with the lower numbers.

Not sure if that distinction is valid or not; my understanding is that if you drink contaminated water it can potentially kill you no matter where you come from. That said, however...maybe there's more to that - now you've piqued my interest in it as well!

Just some thoughts.







CC
 
An excellent post, CC. You might be right that there were no immunizations against many of the common maladies of the ACW. You are absolutely right about the potential lethality of exposure to dysentery and typhoid. We still see people suffering that even today in the developing world.

But another aspect would be those who, like Jackson, died of an opportunistic infection because of battle wounds. For the record, would Jackson(and those like him) be considered a battlefield death, or would it be disease?

I'm gonna have to do some snooping.
 
The only thing I know on the subject is that city boys did better than country boys for just the reason you mentioned - "more exposure".

I have no idea on North vs. South or exact statistics - so anyone who digs them up is heartily encouraged to share them.

As for Jackson specifically (In general, I'm not sure - depends on how you want to define "died as a result of his injuries" - but I wouldn't count something that took advantage of you being weakened by injury. It has to be the wounds themselves.): He died of pneunomina, its pretty clear (I can source this if I have to but its established in several places, I believe).

He was recovering from the effects of his injuries and the operation and it struck him down.
 
He (Jackson) died of pneunomina, its pretty clear (I can source this if I have to but its established in several places, I believe).

He was recovering from the effects of his injuries and the operation and it struck him down.

I'm sure that won't be necessary. The common version is in line with your description. But my question is, where would Jackson's type fall in the statistical maze?
 
In my honest opinion, "Death of (illness)". Death by injuries implies the injuries themselves did it, not that the victim was recovering but struck down by another thing that took advantage of his weakened state.

Pneunomina and its ilk are attracted to the weakened, not necessarily the wounded. So if the wounds are healing, don't blame them.

Of course, "infection" is a consequence of injury - not to be unduly complicated, I swear, but it can be considered "died of wounds".

I don't know if a doctor would back me up, but that's the best I can give you.
 
One of the things not mentioned that should be is the habit of US soldiers drinking coffee; they boiled their coffee water which aided measuarbly in preventing dysentery.
 
I've done a little bit of snooping. I've found no magic bullets for my question, but I have repeatedly found stats that belie traditional wisdom.

.... Total killed.... Wounds.... Disease, etc.
USA.... 360,222.... 110,070.... 250,152
CSA.... 258,000.... 94,000.... 164,000

Close examination of these stats would support that the Union lost 230% more by disease than by battle wounds. By comparison, the South lost about 150% more by disease than by wounds. The obvious wildcard here is the "etc." unless I'm missing something. The percentages are off the top of my head since I don't have a calculator.

Any thoughts?

http://www.factasy.com/civil_war/casualties.shtml
 
Confederates: Generally poorer rations

Battlefield Detectives-Civil War-Shiloh
History Channel Documentary covered the fact the Confederates received less calories with their rations than their opponents. The U.S. Army has done extensive studies on nutrition and rations for its troops, and by necessity it would study the effect on soldiers in different eras.

The Confederates ate mainly a diet of corn and pork; the Union soldiers ate mainly beef and wheat, a more nutritious source of nourishment. Shortchange an army on rations and water and it shows in the long term battle effectiveness of the soldiers.

R.E. Lee even recognized the inability of the Confederate quartermaster system in supplying adequate amounts of rations for the soldiers and forage for the horses.

Large numbers of Confederates suffered scurvy and many suffered from night blindness. (Due to poor nutrition) An army does not work solely on heroism; adequate diets played their part.
 
David -

I'll try and do some snooping too. I could swear I've come across something in my travels where people(?) (universities, researchers?) have attempted to massage the CW statistics to take into account the 'got wounded....then got infected two weeks later...then died' issue and how the accounting was done for that. (Because I agree with you - if a guy gets wounded first, but then subsequently dies within a few weeks or so from complications with that wound...how is the statistic counted? Wounded? Or, dead?)

I thought that at some point some number crunchers had attempted to work with the CW's statistics to try and figure that out (or at least account for some of it, anyway), but it's been a while since I've seen that.

[I should put that on pamc153PA's Pet Peeve list!! I hate it when I think I've read something...somewhere...and then can't remember where it was! :(]







CC



Addendum: On the other hand...not sure if this was where Elennsar was going or not. You'd want to be able to actually separate battle dead from wounded. So, even if the guy dies three weeks later from complications of the wound...the statistical point is that he was actually wounded on the battlefield and not dead. This would, to me anyway, seem to divide the statistics from over-all war statistics (how many died total...including those from wound-related issues) and the individual battle statistics themselves (which might be worth leaving them as is...since that's what actually happened (statistically) on the day of the battle). Hmmmm....what to do, what to do!?
 
This afternoon M.E. Wolf posted a interesting review of Oysters on a post about Oysters. In those posts I think that one can gain some insite as how the Union Army fared in the way of rashions vs the Confederate Army.

To me, it looks that a well fed army did far better than one that had very little to eat.

Richard
 
My great-grandfather had been in Andersonville for less than a week in 1864 when he reported sickness and deaths. Scurvy seemed to be the worst malady the prisoners faced with a lack of vegetables and fruit in their meager diet. Of course drinking from the stream was deadly.


June 12th.
....Find the north side of the prison to be honey combed with burrows and dugouts, some of them large enough to contain 20 men. Going over the prison and coming in contact with its inmates, one's eyes fill with tears and the heart shrinks in horror at the scenes around him-men most skeletons from lack of food, from diarrhea, and chills, and fever. Others are racked with rheumatism or bloated with scurvy; more than half clothed in rags.

The rations are brought in the afternoon meat and rice in fifty pound sacks. Corn bread in sheets about 18x24 in. and two or three inches thick and sometimes half cooked, or cooked so hard so as to endanger our teeth. Bacon sides form our meat rations, and no vegetables so that scurvy runs riot among the older prisoners. Some of my ninety already on the sick list. Yesterday went with two of them to sick call. The gathering place was at a place between the two stockades, with two or three surgeons in attendance. Near two thousand reported sick. It was the most heart rendering sight I ever saw. Men brought in blankets by scores weak and wan from diarrhea or bloated, and loathsome from scurvy or scarce able to hobble from rheumatism. They beg to be sent to the hospital or that some kind of shelter might be given them from the sun or rain. Have drawn raw rations of corn meal and bacon the past four days. When raw rations are given out, six men from each ninety are allowed to go out under guard for wood. Have to go some half a mile and lug it in on our backs thus one man has to lug enough for fifteen. Have managed to lug in some pine bought to carpet our tent which is made of two wool blankets, with one overcoat for our bed covering. The weather hot with a shower in the afternoon so far each day. Have felt dull and stupid today, I think it is from the heat and change of food. Scarce any change from our week-day routine of prison life. Came across my old townsman and christian brother today. He has been a prisoner seven months. D. F. Nichols, of the 18th Mass. Regiment. Six men sick with diarrhea today in my vicinity.

www.civilwardiary.net
 
It is a real quandry and one that has certainly caused a few researchers some hair pulling sessions. Several years ago I did some serious research on the 3rd IA VI and found myself very confused, IIRC, 80% of those who died of disease did so after having receiving wounds in battle. I thought I had something earth shattering so I started to look at a couple three other units and found one that had huge numbers that died of disease and only a very few who were even involved in combat. It's very difficult to ascertain when there seems to be little consistancy. One thing I did note was that the AoT had a much higher proportion of KIA/WIA vs disease casualties than either the AoP or the AoC... though this was only w/ the units I took a hard look at.

Upon further looking it seemed there was a direct correlation w/ how long a unit was in camp/garrison as to how well they fared against disease. Also an interesting nugget, Regiments or Brigades w/ officers w/ experiance on the Continent had a lower rate of disease as well. Part of this was an insistance on the Continent that the soldier make soups instead of frying their food. They also had a tendency to instill greater discipline towards hygenie. To further that hypothesis IIRC Cleburne's Division had the lowest rate of disease casualties in the AoT CS.

It would be an interesting Masters thesis for somebody to undertake.

David -

I'll try and do some snooping too. I could swear I've come across something in my travels where people(?) (universities, researchers?) have attempted to massage the CW statistics to take into account the 'got wounded....then got infected two weeks later...then died' issue and how the accounting was done for that. (Because I agree with you - if a guy gets wounded first, but then subsequently dies within a few weeks or so from complications with that wound...how is the statistic counted? Wounded? Or, dead?)

I thought that at some point some number crunchers had attempted to work with the CW's statistics to try and figure that out (or at least account for some of it, anyway), but it's been a while since I've seen that.

[I should put that on pamc153PA's Pet Peeve list!! I hate it when I think I've read something...somewhere...and then can't remember where it was! :(]







CC



Addendum: On the other hand...not sure if this was where Elennsar was going or not. You'd want to be able to actually separate battle dead from wounded. So, even if the guy dies three weeks later from complications of the wound...the statistical point is that he was actually wounded on the battlefield and not dead. This would, to me anyway, seem to divide the statistics from over-all war statistics (how many died total...including those from wound-related issues) and the individual battle statistics themselves (which might be worth leaving them as is...since that's what actually happened (statistically) on the day of the battle). Hmmmm....what to do, what to do!?
 
This is the Roster of fallen for C Co 3rd IA VI

Baird, Robert. Age 41. Residence Patch Grove, Wis., nativity Pennsylvania. Enlisted Sept. 20, 1862. Mustered Oct. 25, 1862. Wounded and missing July 12, 1863, Jackson, Miss. Leg amputated. Died of wounds July 15, 1863, Jackson, Miss.

Dennison, William H. Age 26. Residence Elkader, nativity New York. Enlisted May 20, 1861. Mustered June 8, 1861. Promoted Sixth Corporal Sept. 19, 1862; Fifth Corporal Oct. 4, 1862; Fourth Corporal Oct. 31, 1862; Third Corporal Feb. 1, 1863. Wounded in knee April 6, 1862, Shiloh, Tenn. Died Feb. 15, 1864. Buried at Jefferson Barracks, St. Louis. Section 7, grave 219.

Dix, Harvey. Age 21. Residence McGregor, nativity Massachusetts. Enlisted May 22, 1861, as Fourth Corporal. Mustered June 8, 1861. Killed Aug. 20, 1861, while leading a scouting party near Kirksville, Mo.

Fulton, James. Age 19. Residence McGregor, nativity Ohio. Enlisted May 22, 1861. Mustered June 8, 1861. Died in hospital of fever, Sept. 9, 1862, Macon City, Mo.

Lyons, John. Age 35. Residence McGregor, nativity Ireland. Enlisted May 22, 1861. Mustered June 8, 1861. Died Jan. 30, 1862, St. Louis, Mo. Buried in National Cemetery, Jefferson Barracks, Mo. Section 51, grave 60.

McLoon, Barney. Age 20. Residence McGregor, nativity Ireland. Enlisted May 22, 1861. Mustered June 8, 1861. Killed in action April 6, 1862, Shiloh, Tenn.

Mack, John. Age 27. Residence Elkader, nativity New York. Enlisted May 22, 1861, as Wagoner. Mustered June 8, 1861. Died in hospital May 9, 1862, St. Louis, Mo. Buried in National Cemetery, Jefferson Barracks, Mo. Section 50, grave 116.

Squire, Lester. Age 39. Residence Clayton County, nativity Vermont. Enlisted May 22, 1861.Mustered June 8, 1861. Killed in action Sept. 17, 1861, Blue Mills, Mo.

Stamm, John. Age 22. Residence McGregor, nativity Germany. Enlisted May 22, 1861. Mustered June 8, 1861. Wounded slightly in leg April 6, 1862, Shiloh, Tenn. Missing in battle Sept. 12, 1863, Jackson, Miss. No further record.

Stephenson, William C. Age 22. Residence Elkader, nativity Ohio. Enlisted May 21, 1861. Mustered June 8, 1861. Wounded mortally July 12, 1863, Jackson, Miss. Left leg amputated. Died July 23, 1863, Vicksburg, Miss., of wounds.

Tappen, James. Age 18. Residence Monona, nativity New York. Enlisted Sept. 20, 1862. Mustered Sept. 20, 1862. Died Aug. 9, 1863. Buried in Jefferson Barracks Cemetery, St. Louis, Mo. Section 5, grave 102.

Wakefield, Lorenzo. Age 18. Residence Elkader, nativity Pennsylvania. Enlisted May 22, 1861. Mustered June 8, 1861. Wounded in left thigh July 12, 1863, Jackson, Miss. Leg amputated. Died of wounds July 25, 1863, Vicksburg, Miss.

Warren, Ezra G. Age 22. Residence Oskaloosa. Enlisted May 20, 1861. Mustered June 8, 1861. Wounded. Missing July 12, 1863, Jackson, Miss. Supposed to have been buried by the enemy.
 
Dear List Members;

I do have the US MILITARY MEDICAL HISTORY of the Civil War.

Unfortunately, they are not easily copied .... and would be tons of posts.

Example: Mortality rate of White Soldiers just on the Atlantic Side of the War theater from the beginning of hostilities to July 1, 1861.

Strength of Army in May 1861 - 16,161
Strength of Army in June 1861- 48,360
Class I Zymotic Diseases:
20 different classified diseases listed.

Acute Diarrhoea May -1,217 cases-no fatalities
Acute Diarrhoea June- 6,601 cases- no fatalities
Total cases: 7,818

Typhoid with Typhus lead the way in fatalities
Typhoid Fever:
May 17 cases -4 fatals
June 45 cases - 13 fatals

Typhus Fever:
May 7 cases - 1 fatal
June 8 cases - 0 fatal

STDs - Gonorrheoa tops the list of cases
May - 266
June - 431

Syphilis
May - 90
June - 265

Just an excerpt of the statistics of the diseases.

Just some thoughts.

Respectfully submitted for consideration,
M. E. Wolf
 
Medical/Surgical History--Part I, Volume I
Introduction.
[excerpt]
An examination of the monthly reports of sick and wounded from these General Hospitals shows that their population was constantly fluctuating. Thousands of patients were often received and sent away in a single month. Events at the front, and the consequent condition of the hospitals near the base of operations, more frequently than the nature of the disease or injury, determined the stay of the patient in any individual hospital. Of course when a number of cases were sent from a hospital in anticipation of fresh arrivals, the less serious cases of both wounds and disease were, so far as possible, selected for transportation, a fact which is not to be overlooked in interpreting the greater mortality which distinguished the hospitals near the base of operations; but it was not always practicable to adhere strictly to this rule. Moreover, no inconsiderable movement of individual patients was determined by the efforts made from time to time by the State authorities to have the sick and wounded transferred for treatment to hospitals within their own State boundaries.
A review of all these facts, and of others of similar character, which need not now be specified, compelled the compiler of this volume reluctantly to abandon the hope of presenting in tabular form the number of cases of each disease treated in General Hospitals. The plan adopted with regard to the matter may be briefly summed up as follows:
The Departmental tables embrace the Cases and Deaths obtained by the consolidation of the monthly sick reports of troops in the Field and in Garrison. They represent the number of men taken sick each month out of the mean strength given, and the nature of their complaints so far as could be ascertained by the medical officers who attended them. They set forth also the number who died with their commands, and in the several Post, Regimental, Brigade, and Division Hospitals attached.
The Hospital tables exhibit the number who died in the General Hospitals of each region, arranged by months and causes of death.
The Consolidated tables for Regions embrace, then, the total number of new Cases occurring from month to month in the strength given, arranged by diseases, and the total number of Deaths, also arranged by months and diseases, and including deaths in General Hospital as well as those occurring in the field and in garrison.
t will then be understood, that in computing the ratio of Cases to strength for any disease, the number of cases may be compared with the strength given in the departmental tables, or with their sum in the regional or army tables. But in computing the ratio of Deaths to strength, the hospital population, as exhibited in the several hospital tables, must be taken into account.
A comparison of the number of cases with the number of deaths for any disease will, however, require the consideration of some additional circumstances. For since it has been impossible to prepare tables showing the number of Cases of each disease received into the General Hospitals, and since every effort has been made to secure the distribution of the Deaths among the real causes of death, the number of deaths exhibited by the Regional and Army tables cannot always be regarded as bearing a direct relationship to the number of cases. The figures are to be regarded rather as independent facts, often intimately connected, and here offered for future reasonable discussion. No attempt has been made to reconcile the apparent discrepancies in the tables arising from this source. It was thought important that both classes of facts should be presented in the most complete manner, and that all attempt to bring them into accord should be postponed to become a subject of discussion in connection with individual diseases of importance in the Second Volume.
An examination of the tables, therefore, will show many instances in which the number of Deaths is disproportionally large as compared with the number of Cases, and even some instances in which more Deaths than Cases are reported. These examples are not to be looked upon as oversights or errors on the part of those to whom the preparation of the tables was entrusted. They are the necessary consequence of the fidelity with which the facts, as reported, were consolidated. A single example will serve as an illustration.
In table LXVII, which is an abstract of the Sickness and Mortality of the Central Region for the year ending June 30, 1864, it will be observed on page 429 that the number of Cases of Inflammation of the Brain reported is 215, with 271 Deaths, which might be supposed to involve an impossibility. But an examination of the previous table shows, page 423, that 128 of these deaths occurred in General Hospital. It would appear, therefore, simply that 215 Cases and 143 Deaths of Inflammation of the Brain were reported among the garrisons and troops in the Central Region during the year, and that besides 128 Deaths of the same disease occurred in the General Hospitals of the Region. Some of the Deaths in hospital were doubtless patients included among the Cases of the garrison and field reports; but the greater part of them were probably men who had entered hospital with other complaints. The detailed facts would be interesting and valuable, but cannot be ascertained. We can,. however, learn from the tables the number of New Cases of the disease which originated in the reported strength in field and in garrison during the time specified. We can also learn the whole number of Deaths attributed to this cause, including those which occurred in the given hospital population. Each of these facts has its own independent value, and each requires separate consideration. The two classes of facts can only be brought into relationship with a view to studying the relative mortality per thousand cases in connection with those affections of which a very large number of cases has been reported, and even in these instances the results attained will often require modification in accordance with considerations peculiar to each disease.
The writer is perfectly aware of the inconvenience of the circumstances just recounted, and has also fully considered many other objections to the plan which he has adopted for dealing with the monthly reports of the General Hospital. He also regrets greatly the impossibility of compiling tables giving general statistical information with regard to the number of cases of each disease which arose de novo in the hospital population, or of secondary diseases and complications. He is firmly convinced, however, that a more ambitious course than he has adopted would have led merely to less reliable results.
It must further be explained in this place that the tables in this volume do not embrace those Killed in Action, those dead of Wounds or Disease while Prisoners of War, or those who died while on Furlough, Leave of Absence. Absence Without Leave, or after Discharge from service on surgeon's certificate of disability. In the case of those Killed in Action, the monthly sick reports could not always be expected to attain accuracy, the Surgeon usually obtaining his information with regard to them indirectly and at second hand. The names of such of the killed as could be learned by him with reasonable certainty were entered in the sick report among the names of the dead, but the printed blanks directed that they should not be included in the statistical portion of the report, and a careful examination of the reports received shows that this rule was advisable.
The number of deaths from Gunshot and other Wounds given in the tables, therefore, excludes the Killed in Battle, bat the number of Wounded was intended to embrace all the Wounded among the mean strength given, and when this intention was not carried out, as was sometimes probably the case, especially after certain general engagements, it was in consequence of circumstances which interfered with the efforts of the Medical Officer to obtain full details with regard to the Wounded of the commands to which they belonged.
Instances in which this took place are known, and it, seems reasonable to suppose that many others must have occurred, so that the figures in the tables representing the number of Wounded, and especially the number of Gunshot Wounds, must be regarded as probably less than the real number occurring in the mean strength represented. For the full discussion of this part of the subject, however, the reader must be referred to the Surgical Volumes of this work.
In addition to the foregoing explanations, which it has been thought advisable to offer as aids to the appreciation of the tables contained in this volume, it seems proper to make next some general remarks with regard to the Total Losses of our armies during the war by Death, and by Discharge on surgeon's certificate of disability. These remarks will be founded upon estimates derived from other sources of information than the reports of sick and wounded employed in the construction of the tables, and will therefore be of service as indicating the degree of completeness which these may fairly be considered to possess.
The first source of information which would appear to require consideration is the Adjutant General's Office, in which are preserved the military records of the army. Here are to be found the Returns of posts, armies, and departments, the monthly Muster and Pay Rolls of individual companies, and the Final Statements of deceased soldiers. The last-named of these reports have served as the basis for a most pains-taking investigation with regard to the subject of our present inquiry. It was the duty of company and other officers to furnish such a record of each death occurring within their jurisdiction, and hence the fact and date of death was thus reported in a large part of the whole number of the dead. These returns give, in each case, the name, rank, company, and regiment of the deceased, and state also, whenever the officer making the return was acquainted with the circumstances, whether he was Killed in Battle, or Died of Wounds or of Disease.
Of course many men were killed or died for whom no such final statements were made at the time. After engagements men were often missing, concerning whom it was not known whether they were killed or taken prisoners; deaths not unfrequently occurred among men absent from their commands of which no responsible officer had knowledge; reports were captured by the enemy, lost or mislaid, and the duty of making them out was not invariably performed. At the close of the war, therefore, these files were far from complete.
[excerpt]
In reply to an inquiry from the Surgeon General, the Adjutant General has furnished the following statement dated October 25, 1870:
"The total number of deaths, so far as known at the office, from the commencement to the close of the Rebellion, is as follows:
Regular Army, Commissioned Officers 267
Regular Army, Enlisted Men 4,592
Volunteer Army, Commissioned Officers 8,553
Volunteer Army, Enlisted Men 256,427
Colored Troops, Commissioned Officers 285
Colored Troops, Enlisted Men 33,380
Total number of deaths 303,504"
The commissioned officers of the Colored troops being almost without exception white, the above figures may be classified as follows:

Total mortality among White Officers and Men 270,124
Total mortality among Colored Men 33,380
Total number of deaths 303,504
These numbers are to be understood as embracing the deaths from all causes, including the slain in battle and those who died while prisoners of war, or while absent on furlough or otherwise, so far as it has been possible to collect information with regard to them at the Adjutant General's Office up to the 25th of October, 1870.
The period represented by the words "from the commencement to the close of the Rebellion" in the above statement, was found, on inquiry at the Adjutant General's Office, to have been used in the case of the Regular Army with a somewhat different significance from that with which it was employed in the case of the Volunteer Forces.
For the Regular Army the figures represent the number of officers and men who are known to have died between the 15th of April, 1861, and the 1st of June, 1865.
For the Volunteer Forces, both White and Colored, however, the figures embrace all the deaths known to have occurred in the volunteer organizations called out during the progress of the war up to the date of their muster out of the service. This date may be approximately fixed for the White troops at about the close of the last fiscal year represented in this volume, though a few scattered Companies remained in service subsequently, the last of which, a Battalion of New Mexico Volunteer Cavalry, was not mustered out until November 18, 1867.
In the case, of the Colored Volunteers, the process went on more slowly, the last regiment having been mustered out December 20, 1867.
In both cases it is to be understood that the number of dead given is derived from an actual count of the names of the individuals recorded as dead, and not from the consolidation of numerical returns of any kind. This circumstance renders it quite clear that the real number of deaths cannot be supposed to be less than the statement above given by the Adjutant General, and a consideration of the facts with regard to the additions made to the death files since the war, will give weight to the opinion that it cannot be materially greater.
[excerpt]
Thus, for example, in Part VI of the Final Report of the Provost Marshal General to the Secretary of War, dated March 17, 1866, there will be found under the head of "Casualties in the Military Forces," an official statement of the mortality of the Army as deduced from the muster rolls and returns of the Adjutant General's Office. This statement, which is given in tabular form on page 78 of the report, embraces a considerable number of items, the consolidation of which gives the following results:

Number of deaths among White Officers and Men 250,651
Number of deaths among Colored Men 29,038
Total 279,689

[excerpt]
February 27, 1869, a report on the same subject was made by the Adjutant General to the Secretary of War, for the information of a Committee of the House of Representatives. This report, a copy of which was furnished to the Surgeon General, contained a "Consolidated Statement of the number of Federal Soldiers who died in the Service of the United States during the Rebellion." A consolidation of the items, of this table furnishes the following results:

Number of deaths among White Officers and Men 261,036
Number of deaths among Colored Men 33,380
Total 294,416



continued
 
A comparison between these three sets of figures which show the number of deaths known to the office of the Adjutant General, in March, 1866, February, 1869, and October, 1870, respectively, will afford some notion of the laborious and conscientious manner in which that officer and his assistants have endeavored to perfect the Official Record of Deaths.
The figures offered at the last date will probably receive still further accretions in the future; yet, as the number of new names added to the list during the three months immediately preceding October 25, 1870, was only one hundred, it cannot be presumed that the whole number finally recorded will be very much greater than that now presented.
In appreciating the evidence derived from this source, the possibility that a few deaths may have been erroneously recorded by mistake, or in consequence of fraudulent evidence, must, of course, receive consideration. It must also be confessed, that, notwithstanding all the pains taken, a certain number of deaths must eventually escape record. Nevertheless, when all the circumstances are taken into consideration, and especially the pecuniary interests involved, the scrutiny which this circumstance has compelled, the large number of names added to the list annually for several years after the close of the war, and the small number added recently, it may well be believed that a close approximation to the actual facts has now been attained.
The next source of information for consideration is the office of the Quartermaster General.
According to the Army Regulations in force at the commencement of the war, it was the duty of the Quartermaster's Department to provide for the Burial of deceased soldiers. The great increase of the national forces caused by the war, and the large number of dead, suggested, early in the course of the struggle, the idea of National Cemeteries especially designed for this purpose.
By an act of Congress approved July 17, 1862, the President of the United States was authorized to purchase cemetery grounds and cause them to be enclosed for the burial of "the soldiers who shall die in the service of the Country."
After the close of the war it was deemed necessary to legislate still further on the subject, and it was provided by Public Resolution No. 21, approved April 13, 1866, "that the Secretary of War be, and he is hereby, authorized and required to take immediate measures to preserve from desecration the graves of the soldiers of the United States, who fell in battle or died of disease in the field and in hospital during the War of the Rebellion; to secure suitable burial places in which they may be properly interred, and to have the grounds enclosed, so that the resting places of the honored dead may be kept sacred forever."
In the following year an act "to establish and protect National Cemeteries" was approved February 22, 1867, which provided in detail for the purchase of grounds, the management and inspection of cemeteries, and the punishment of any person who should mutilate monuments or injure the trees and plants.
[excerpt]
The Quartermaster General, in his annual report for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1865, dated November 8, 1865, makes the following statement' "Under General Orders No. 40, of July 3, 1865, which, on the conclusion of the war, called upon the officers of this department for special reports of the number of interments registered during the war, reports have been received from officers in seventeen States, including the District of Columbia. They report the interments registered in their offices at 116,148. Of these there were whites, 95,803; colored, 20,345; loyal, 98,827; disloyal, 12,596; refugees, 600; contrabands, 4,125."
In his annual report for the following fiscal year, dated October, 1866, the same officer furnishes an elaborate account of the efforts being made under his supervision, to collect the remains of the dead and to establish National Cemeteries. Forty-one National Cemeteries had been established at the close of the fiscal year terminating June 30, 1866, and ten more had been determined upon. Four hundred and twelve cemeteries, not the property of the Nation, were known to contain the remains of soldiers. Up to the date mentioned 87,664 had been removed and reinterred; the National Cemeteries already contained "the remains of 104,528 loyal soldiers." It was believed that 135,881 bodies would yet have to be moved and reinterred, and the total number of the remains "of loyal soldiers" was estimated at 341,670.
As the work of collecting the remains of the deceased soldiers from battle-fields, way sides, and private cemeteries progressed, it was found that these estimates were not exact. The number of bodies which it seemed desirable to move and reinter, was found to be somewhat larger than had been anticipated, but the total number of remains proved considerably less than the estimate.
Inquiries made at the office of the Quartermaster General in November, 1870, showed that about two hundred and forty thousand bodies had been moved and reinterred, and a few hundred more still required the same care. At that time there were seventy-three National Cemeteries devoted exclusively to the burial of the dead who had fallen during the rebellion in the service of their country. Bodies of "deceased Union soldiers" were also known to be buried in three hundred and sixteen local, private, or post cemeteries.
The total number of graves, so far as known, was 315,555. These were all believed to contain the bodies of Union soldiers who had died or been killed during the rebellion, but of the whole number 172,109 only, or rather more than one-half, had been identified by name.
It appears, therefore, that while, as it has been shown, the names of 303,504 dead officers and soldiers are recorded in the office of the Adjutant General with every reasonable probability that the list does not embrace quite the whole number, the records of the Quartermaster General show the existence of 315,555 graves believed to contain the remains of officers and soldiers dead during the Rebellion. The question, therefore, at once arises, what statistical value can be attached to the latter figures as indicating the real number of the dead? There can be no doubt that the officers to whom the task of collecting the bodies of the dead was entrusted, performed their work with zeal and care. Yet from the very nature of the case, the greater portion of the labor was done after the war had closed, and most of the bodies collected from their temporary resting places on battle-fields or elsewhere throughout the Southern States, had been several years in the ground. The whole country was divided into districts, and the most careful inquiries were made by the officer in charge of the Cemeterial work of each, so that it is not likely that any considerable number of soldiers' graves could have escaped observation. But, on the other hand, is there no probability that in disinterring the nameless dead, the bodies of teamsters, camp followers, refugees, fugitive slaves, or even Confederate soldiers may have been mistaken at times for those of our own men? There appears to be little doubt that those engaged upon the work took every reasonable precaution to avoid mistakes, and that every available source of information was freely consulted. Yet the extent to which clothing and arms captured from the United States were used by the Confederates, must have interfered considerably with the certainty of such identifications. Taking all the circumstances into consideration, it would hardly be possible therefore to regard the number of graves as affording any very precise indication of the mortality of our armies, if no other fact than this number existed for our guidance. Yet when the close agreement between the number of graves and the number actually known to be dead, as shown by the evidence in the Adjutant General's Office, is taken into consideration, there would appear to be no great difficulty in arriving at an approximative judgment. The real number is assuredly greater than the number of names recorded up to the present date at the office of the Adjutant General. It cannot reasonably be supposed to exceed the total number of graves. The truth must probably be between three hundred and four and three hundred and sixteen thousand deaths.
The total number of deaths recorded, embracing officers and men of the Regular Army from April 15, 1861, to June 30, 1865, inclusive, and officers and men of the Volunteer forces, both white and colored, while in service, from the date of their muster-in to the date of their muster-out, is 282,955, being 20,549 less than the corresponding figures of the Adjutant General, or about nine-tenths of what may be safely regarded as the whole number of deaths within the limits specified. The deaths contained in these registers are distributed as follows:

Regular Army, Officers and Enlisted Men 5,200
Volunteer Army, Officers and Enlisted Men, including Officers of Colored Troops 245,690
Enlisted men of Colored Troops 32,065
Total 282,955

continued
 
A comparison of the two 'sets of records would seem likely, therefore, to afford the means of arriving at some general conclusions with regard to the proportion of the whole number of the dead who were Killed in Battle, Died of Wounds, or Died of Disease.
The latest report by the Adjutant General which makes any discrimination between the several Causes of Death, is the report of February 27, 1869, to which allusion has already been made. Of the 294,416 deaths included in the report, 55,297 are given as dead of Unknown Causes. The rest are classified as Killed in Battle, Died of Wounds, Died of Disease, and died of Other Known Causes.
This report gives the number of Killed in Battle as 44,238, distributed as follows:

Regular Army, Officers and Men 1,355
White Volunteers, Officers and Men 41,369
Colored Volunteers, Enlisted Men 1,514
Total killed in battle 44,238
The alphabetical registers of the Surgeon General's Office contain, as already indicated, a much smaller number of deaths of this class. They sum up 35,408, distributed as follows:

Regular Army, Officers and Men. 831
White Volunteers, Officers and Men 38,805
Colored Volunteers, Enlisted Men 772
Total killed in battle 35,408
For the Killed in Battle, therefore, it is clear that the figures of the Adjutant General's report must be preferred; yet in view of the 55,297 men borne on the same report as dead from Unknown Causes, it cannot be believed that even these figures represent the whole number Killed in Battle. They are simply to be regarded as the least numbers which can safely be employed to represent this category, and an additional estimated number should be added, to be determined after a consideration of the numbers which will be shown to have died from other causes.
Next, with regard to the number of those who Died of Wounds. The report of the Adjutant General represents the total number of this class as 33,993, distributed as follows-

Regular Army, Officers and Men 850
White Volunteers, Officers and Men 32,106
Colored Volunteers, Enlisted Men 1,037
Total died of wounds 33,993

The alphabetical registers of the Surgeon General's Office, however, permit us very materially to increase these figures. The total number of deaths from wounds and injuries recorded by name on them is 49,205, which are distributed as follows:

Regular Army, Officers and Men 1,174
White Volunteers, Officers and Men 46,271
Colored Volunteers, Enlisted Men 1,760
Total deaths from wounds and injuries 49,205
The same reasons which rendered it proper to regard the figures of the Adjutant General's report as the least number which can be believed to represent the Killed in Battle, compel the recognition of the above count from the Surgeon General's registers as the least number that can be believed to have Died from Wounds and Injuries.
There are besides on the registers the names of 302 officers and men reported to have committed Suicide, 103 Homicides, and 121 Executions, making a total of 526 deaths from these causes, distributed as follows:

Regular Army 27
White Volunteers 442
Colored Volunteers 57
Total suicides, homicides and executions 526
Next, with regard to the number who Died of Disease. The report of the Adjutant General gives the number of this class as 149,043, distributed as follows:

Regular Army, Officers and Men 2,428
White Volunteers, Officers and Men 126,404
Colored Volunteers, Enlisted Men 26,211
Total 149,043

Here again the death registers of the Surgeon General's Office record a much larger number of names. The total number of deaths of this class entered on the books being 186,216, distributed as follows:

Regular Army, Officers and Men 3,009
White Volunteers, Officers and Men 153,995
Colored Volunteers, Enlisted Men 29,212
Total number of deaths from disease 186,216

Seeing then that the report of the Adjutant General affords the nearest approximation to the Whole Number of Deaths, and to the number Killed in Battle, while the registers of the Surgeon General's Office afford the nearest approximation to the number of deaths from Wounds and from Disease, we will find that of the whole number of deaths the causes of but 24,184 remain Unknown, and the following table presents a synoptical view of the conclusions indicated in the course of the foregoing remarks:

Regulars. WhiteVolunteers. ColoredVolunteers. Total.
Killed in battle 1,355 41,369 1,514 44,238
Died of wounds and injuries 1,174 46,271 1,760 49,205
Suicide, homicide, and execution 27 442 57 526
Died of disease 3,009 153,995 29,212 186,216
Unknown causes 159 23,188 837 24,184
Total 5,724 265,265 33,380 304,369
The total in this table foots up a few hundred deaths more than are reported by the Adjutant General, and this on account of the mortality of the Regular Army being estimated here as rather greater than is shown in his report. This greater estimate results partly from accepting as the number of Killed in Battle among the Regular troops the number of names so reported to the Adjutant General, partly from the fact that the Surgeon General's Death Registers contain a larger number of names of regular soldiers dead of Wounds and Disease, and partly from the circumstance that the count of the latter has been made to go up to the close of the fiscal year terminating June 30, 1865, representing thus the deaths of one month more than is embraced in the Adjutant General's reports.
By consolidating the deaths from violent causes in the foregoing table we obtain the following general view:
Regulars. WhiteVolunteers. ColoredVolunteers. Total.
Violent deaths 2,556 88,082 3,331 93,969
Deaths from disease 3,009 153,995 29,212 186,216
Unknown causes 159 23,188 837 24,184
Total 5,724 265,265 33,380 304,369

From this view it will be seen that of 280,185 deaths from known causes, the proportion of violent deaths to the whole number was one out of every three deaths. A very great difference, however, existed between the White and Colored troops in these respects. In the case of the White troops, out of 247,642 deaths from known causes, the proportion of violent deaths to the whole number of deaths was one out of every two and seven-tenths. In the case of the Colored troops, out of 32,543 deaths from known causes, the proportion of violent deaths to the whole number of deaths was one out of every nine and eight-tenths. Some difference also appears to exist in this respect between the Regular and Volunteer troops; the proportion of violent deaths to the whole number of deaths from known causes being one to two and two-tenths for the first, and one to two and seven-tenths for the second of these classes. It is true that these figures do not represent the whole number of deaths, nevertheless the deaths from unknown causes bear so small a proportion to the whole number, and the probability that these also are distributed in nearly the same manner among the several causes is so great, that it cannot be supposed the general result would be materially modified had it been possible to ascertain the cause of death in every case.
[end of a very lengthy excerpt]

continued
 
Medical/Surgical History--Part I, Volume I
Introduction.
(continuation of the introduction)
In the Second Volume of this work it is proposed to discuss in detail the Diseases which were the chief causes of the sickness, the mortality, and the discharges for disability recorded in this. Histories of cases, accounts of pathological investigations, records of the work done in the Army Medical Museum, and extracts from reports with regard to particular diseases made from time to time to the Surgeon General, will be published, so far as seems desirable to represent the more important facts in connection with these subjects; and an attempt will be made to offer such commentaries on the evidence recorded as may seem likely to facilitate the examination of the topics discussed, by those who are engaged in the study of the sickness and mortality of armies.
An examination of Tables C and CXI will show at a glance the subjects which must necessarily receive chief attention.
Foremost will be Camp Diarrhœa and Dysentery, and Camp Fevers. Table C exhibits 129,386 deaths from disease among White troops, distributed among their several causes. Table CXI contains 27,499 deaths from disease among Colored troops, distributed in like manner. It will be seen that of these numbers 37,794 deaths of White and 6,764 of Colored troops were due to the several forms of Diarrhœa and Dysentery, which must, therefore, be regarded as the most important causes of the mortality from disease in our armies. Next come the several forms of Camp Fever reported under such heads as Typhoid, Typhus, Common Continued, Remittent, and Typho-Malarial Fevers. To these the tables attribute 35,965 deaths of White and 4,691 of Colored troops.
The next most important cause of death among the troops was Pneumonia, of which 14,738 deaths of White and 5,233 of Colored troops are reported.
Among the other leading causes of mortality are Small Pox and Varioloid, Measles, Consumption, and Intermittent Fevers.
In the matter of discharges for disability other affections assume prominence. Thus, from Tables CI and CXII, it will be seen that the affections which caused the largest number of discharges among White troops were: Consumption, 20,403; Diarrhœa and Dysentery, 17,389; Debility, 14,500; Rheumatism, 11,779; Heart Diseases, 10,636. Among the Colored troops the chief causes of discharge were: Rheumatism, 874; Consumption, 592; Debility, 540, and Diarrhœa and Dysentery, 359.
This brief enumeration, which can readily be extended by the reader on an examination of the tables, will serve to indicate some of the more important subjects which must receive consideration in the next volume, for the completion of which, however, considerable labor will yet be required.
J. J. WOODWARD.
Prepared, under the direction of JOSEPH K. BARNES, Surgeon General United States Army,
BY J. J. WOODWARD, ASSISTANT SURGEON UNITED STATES ARMY.

=============================================

continued
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top