Different historians take away different points from same book

Georgia Sixth

2nd Lieutenant
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Location
Texas
Many of you probably are familiar with Stephen Woodworth, a terrific historian based here in Texas who specializes in the Civil War era. He has a very interesting site where it appears he posts some writings of some of his students. In the link below, the posts four different reviews of the same book "And the War Came" by Kenneth Stampp which examines why the North went to war to stop secession. It's interesting because each of the reviewers took away somewhat different emphasis.

Which just goes to show, historians can all study and read the same primary documents and come away with very different understandings of what happened. Some say it was all about economics. Some say it was slavery. Some say it was capitalism. One thing is clear, there was no more unanimity among the Northerners at the time about what the war was about as there is among posters on this forum.

The link:

And the War Came
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top