Oh wow! Sure wish I could experience that first hand. When you say that the owners are focused on agriculture, are you meaning they are dedicated to the preservation of the land? Or are they focused on profit? -- Sorry, I know that profit is a necessity. But my love of land and history is hoping the focus is on preservation. Do you have any history on the church picture?
Growing cotton is necessarily destructive of soil.
Today, cotton farmers use widely available fertilizers. Back then, there really wasn't much fertilizer available and what was, was expensive. (Note: Cotton farmers did not have barns full of cattle, horses, chickens and pigs for manure to use on their fields. The knowledge was there, but the ordure was not.)
Virgin land might be expected to yield several bales per acre. By the 7th year, the soil was exhausted. It would take about 14 years of lying fallow for the soil to be regenerated. During that time, we're looking at the growth of brush and saplings which had to be cleared when it was nearly time to plant cotton again.
So, in addition to having 1/3 if a plantation planted, another third lying fallow and another third being cleared, cotton was a labor intensive process.
Given that virgin land was desirable, by 1860, most of it was taken. Also given is that cotton cannot be grown much north of the southern Missouri border.
And that brings up many other questions to not be discussed in a Photo contest thread.