Contrabands

That poor young woman on the right looks scared to death! It really makes you think how frightening freedom must have been to some of the former slaves, especially those of a more timid nature. No education, per se, no home, no work, just freedom. A wonderful concept that doesn't really fill your belly, just your heart. Thanks for posting.
That's a very good and close observation--one I had missed when I first glanced at the photo. Your thoughts on the emotions which accompanied freedom are very interesting, too and I imagine very accurate in many cases. I wonder how these people felt about being identified as "contrabands", or whether the term mattered to them at all. I've always found it somewhat troubling, because I think it still defines these people as property. More accurately, illegal property. But property nonetheless.
 
Just ran across the following article on the topic of contrabands, more specifically a view by a man showing up as a potential employer at a contraband camp in Cairo, Illinois. it was picked up and published in a southern paper. It's November 1862 from here: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2006.05.0623:article=7

I've added a few paragraph breaks and a bit of bold to hopefully make it easier to read/skim.

Some thoughts... On the one hand, when a man heads into a camp calling it a menagerie, you know he's not exactly impartial about the humanity of the occupants. But on the other hand, he appears to be willing to purchase a "boy" (teenager apparently) to be trained as a physician, in the usual way that a new physician was apprenticed to an experienced one, regardless whether he attended a medical school. Was that just a test to offer one of them perfect equality and watch them refuse it and fail? Is he saying they did fail, either by disbelieving he was serious or disbelieving any of them could actually become a doctor? I'm curious what doctor around Cairo might be willing to train a black apprentice and how that would go over.

There's a sad but wonderful example of the Catch-22 they were caught in. On the one hand, there was the widespread cliche that black people didn't care about families or home and could be uprooted from such attachments without any guilt because they'd quickly adapt. Yet here, they're behaving normally by hoping to stay near family and home, and that can be interpreted as not wanting to head further up into Illinois and freedom and instead a sign that they would rather try to find their way as freemen back to home and live in the safety of slavery.

I don't doubt they had no sense of how much to ask for wages or how to negotiate for hire. That's kinda what happens when you prevent people from doing it all their lives. Though I wonder if slaves from Virginia or someplace with an annual slave-hiring season would be more shrewd and experienced, compared to those from Mississippi plantations

All right, enough of me yapping, here's the little article:

----start quote-----

While waiting this morning for a boat I concluded to go to the menagerie — a real show, the animals of which are partly caged and partly lying around loose in and about the old barracks over on the bank of the Mississippi. Such a sight ! old men and older women, heads as white as wool and more kinky — babies, from a week old all the way up till too big to be babies, all half clad and distressingly dirty — it is the elephant we got in the raffle, and now what to do with it is the question.

More than two thousand of these wretched beings have been sent here by military authority to prevent starvation. These are '"captives of war,"' most of them having been abandoned by their former masters, in and about Corinth, Inka, and Bolivar. Some are from Curtis's operations.--They have fallen into our hands in spite of our military policy to preserve the status of slavery, and their numbers are daily increasing. There is a great demand in this State for men to gather the corn and cut the winter weeds — so great that Northern Illinois is complaining that the farmers in Southern Illinois gabble up all the best as fast as they come. Men are here every day for hands.

Wishing to get into the notions of the darkies, I passed among them as an Illinois farmer, my army hat answering a capital purpose in the game. I proposed to hire a man. '"Dun no, sah. Where you want me to go ! What you gim 'ee !"' Going up to the dirtiest woman I saw, I proposed to her. '"Can't go sah. ! Is got four babies !"' '"But dar's old granny, I can't leave her."' '"Why, can't you go, too, granny !"' '"O, master, I's in hopes some days it will please do good Lord to give me back to old master."' I tried a dozen or more, and found underlying the hopes of most of them was an ultimate return to their native land. The one refrain was--

"Oh, carry me back !"


Their local attachment is unconquerable, and they seem utterly unreconciled to separating the families. An over sanguine friend of mine, a physician, spoke to me the other day to procure a suitable boy for him, who, after serving a reasonable time as a hostier, [sic--hostler?] could be put to the science of physicing. I concluded to get the boy here; but you ought to have seen the whites of their eyes and their ivory when I suggested studying to be a doctor. The bursting of a bombshell I would hardly have produced greater consternation. The facts here and the facts everywhere bid us look the subject fairly in the face. Until the time comes when these can return to their homes in peace and freedom, they must be managed here, and to do this some system of apprenticeship must be adopted. These creatures have neither the intelligence nor the integrity necessary to contracting wisely for their own labor. One man asked $15 per month the year round, another $20, and another $5.

And yet philanthropists — so called — desire to turn free, and thus deprive them of their natural protection and shelter, four millions of just such beings, bringing desolation upon both whites and blacks.

------end quote--------
 
Just ran across the following article on the topic of contrabands, more specifically a view by a man showing up as a potential employer at a contraband camp in Cairo, Illinois. it was picked up and published in a southern paper. It's November 1862 from here: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:2006.05.0623:article=7

I've added a few paragraph breaks and a bit of bold to hopefully make it easier to read/skim.

Some thoughts... On the one hand, when a man heads into a camp calling it a menagerie, you know he's not exactly impartial about the humanity of the occupants. But on the other hand, he appears to be willing to purchase a "boy" (teenager apparently) to be trained as a physician, in the usual way that a new physician was apprenticed to an experienced one, regardless whether he attended a medical school. Was that just a test to offer one of them perfect equality and watch them refuse it and fail? Is he saying they did fail, either by disbelieving he was serious or disbelieving any of them could actually become a doctor? I'm curious what doctor around Cairo might be willing to train a black apprentice and how that would go over.

There's a sad but wonderful example of the Catch-22 they were caught in. On the one hand, there was the widespread cliche that black people didn't care about families or home and could be uprooted from such attachments without any guilt because they'd quickly adapt. Yet here, they're behaving normally by hoping to stay near family and home, and that can be interpreted as not wanting to head further up into Illinois and freedom and instead a sign that they would rather try to find their way as freemen back to home and live in the safety of slavery.

I don't doubt they had no sense of how much to ask for wages or how to negotiate for hire. That's kinda what happens when you prevent people from doing it all their lives. Though I wonder if slaves from Virginia or someplace with an annual slave-hiring season would be more shrewd and experienced, compared to those from Mississippi plantations

All right, enough of me yapping, here's the little article:

----start quote-----

While waiting this morning for a boat I concluded to go to the menagerie — a real show, the animals of which are partly caged and partly lying around loose in and about the old barracks over on the bank of the Mississippi. Such a sight ! old men and older women, heads as white as wool and more kinky — babies, from a week old all the way up till too big to be babies, all half clad and distressingly dirty — it is the elephant we got in the raffle, and now what to do with it is the question.

More than two thousand of these wretched beings have been sent here by military authority to prevent starvation. These are '"captives of war,"' most of them having been abandoned by their former masters, in and about Corinth, Inka, and Bolivar. Some are from Curtis's operations.--They have fallen into our hands in spite of our military policy to preserve the status of slavery, and their numbers are daily increasing. There is a great demand in this State for men to gather the corn and cut the winter weeds — so great that Northern Illinois is complaining that the farmers in Southern Illinois gabble up all the best as fast as they come. Men are here every day for hands.

Wishing to get into the notions of the darkies, I passed among them as an Illinois farmer, my army hat answering a capital purpose in the game. I proposed to hire a man. '"Dun no, sah. Where you want me to go ! What you gim 'ee !"' Going up to the dirtiest woman I saw, I proposed to her. '"Can't go sah. ! Is got four babies !"' '"But dar's old granny, I can't leave her."' '"Why, can't you go, too, granny !"' '"O, master, I's in hopes some days it will please do good Lord to give me back to old master."' I tried a dozen or more, and found underlying the hopes of most of them was an ultimate return to their native land. The one refrain was--

"Oh, carry me back !"


Their local attachment is unconquerable, and they seem utterly unreconciled to separating the families. An over sanguine friend of mine, a physician, spoke to me the other day to procure a suitable boy for him, who, after serving a reasonable time as a hostier, [sic--hostler?] could be put to the science of physicing. I concluded to get the boy here; but you ought to have seen the whites of their eyes and their ivory when I suggested studying to be a doctor. The bursting of a bombshell I would hardly have produced greater consternation. The facts here and the facts everywhere bid us look the subject fairly in the face. Until the time comes when these can return to their homes in peace and freedom, they must be managed here, and to do this some system of apprenticeship must be adopted. These creatures have neither the intelligence nor the integrity necessary to contracting wisely for their own labor. One man asked $15 per month the year round, another $20, and another $5.

And yet philanthropists — so called — desire to turn free, and thus deprive them of their natural protection and shelter, four millions of just such beings, bringing desolation upon both whites and blacks.

------end quote--------
I am sure that if you asked a group of refugees from any war the same type of questions, the answers would not be dissimilar. Their world turned upside down, and their first chance to make a choice about their own lives, of course they will cling to the familiar. This article infuriates me, as would any such article which makes no attempt to understand, but simply jumps to conclusions based on the author's own prejudices.
 
That's a very good and close observation--one I had missed when I first glanced at the photo. Your thoughts on the emotions which accompanied freedom are very interesting, too and I imagine very accurate in many cases. I wonder how these people felt about being identified as "contrabands", or whether the term mattered to them at all. I've always found it somewhat troubling, because I think it still defines these people as property. More accurately, illegal property. But property nonetheless.

I thought about the title of the thread before posting and left it simply as "contrabands" because that's the title of many of the photographs. However, looking through the photographs, some label the photos "Fugitive slaves..." or "Escaped slaves...." and I think that "contrabands" indicate a step away from slavery, because the the three men that Ben Butler called "contrabands" at Ft. Monroe were asking not to be returned to the slave owner who was demanding them.

These people who were referred to as "contrabands" took great courage and moved into a future with their families, a step toward full emancipation and pushed both politicians and military authorities to confront the continuing status of slaves during the War. That seems a pretty amazing step, especially when everyone was told by Southerners that those of African descent were incapable of more than being a slave. But here's what one person, Alfred Waud, who photographed the "contrabands" and then prepared a sketch for Harper's Weekly, wrote:

There is something very touching in seeing these poor people coming into camp--giving up all the little ties that cluster about home, such as it is in slavery, and trustfully throwing themselves on the mercy of the Yankees, in the hope of getting permission to own themselves and keep their children from the auction-block. This party evidently comprises a whole family from some farm . . .
 
I'm just now working on writing Harriet Jacobs' bio for my book. She went to Alexandria, Virginia as a relief worker in 1862 and then stayed there from 1863 on. She and Julia Wilbur were trying to get food and clothing, housing and jobs for the refugees coming into the city, 20, 30, sometimes 40 per day (maybe more ... I don't have the exact numbers at hand.) Much is made of Harriet's story before the Civil War -- and rightly so -- but I think her work on behalf of the contrabands is well worth knowing about, too. And it does highlight what you guys have been talking about here -- the history that we don't really know a whole lot about.

We definitely don't understand the sheer magnitude of these events. Life as a contraband in Alexandria, a city wholly for the Confederacy but "kept quiet at the point of Northern bayonets" (the city was occupied by Union forces the day after Virginia voted for succession) was a rough one. Even the so-called superintendent of the contrabands, Rev. Albert Gladwin, was trying to force them to pay money they didn't have for coal (which was given as a government ration) and for rooms in the barracks (which were supposed to be given to those who didn't have money for housing), threatened them with flogging when he didn't get his way, and even smacked a little girl when he got a note that he didn't like.

Man, I just want to go back in time and punch that guy in the nose! Grr! But anyway.

Let's put some pics up here of what was going on in Alexandria because it's so nice to have an actual mental image of what folks and the city looked like as I'm writing about them.

34821v.jpg

Freedman's Barracks, Alexandria, Va. (Library of Congress)

Expired Image Removed
Contraband School students in Alexandria (N.Y. Public Library) -- The classes were ginormous, and only a few teachers were available. Harriet set up a free school there where her daughter and another young lady (both colored) taught. I think there were 160 students in the place -- and only two teachers! *faints*

Expired Image Removed
Contrabands at Cumberland Landing, VA, 1862 (LC) -- I like this one because you can actually see their faces.
 
I agree that it's very difficult--almost impossible--to grasp the magnitude of what happened. I can't even express my thoughts about it very well. I believe these are important photos and they document a transition that many people haven't pondered. I've wondered about the emotions of former slaves upon receiving their freedom, but I never gave any thought to the sheer logistics of feeding, housing, educating and employing these people. Photos like these force us to have a better understanding of the situation.
 
That last photo is a cockfight at Gen. Orlando B. Willcox's headquarters. The two men holding the roosters are probably the general's cooks or servants of some kind.

03895v.jpg

  • Title: Petersburg, Virginia. "Cock fighting" at Gen. Orlando B. Willcox's headquarters
  • Creator(s): O'Sullivan, Timothy H., 1840-1882, photographer
  • Date Created/Published: [between 1862 and 1865]
  • Medium: 1 negative : glass, wet collodion.
  • Reproduction Number: LC-DIG-cwpb-04340 (digital file from original neg.)
  • Rights Advisory: No known restrictions on publication.
  • Call Number: LC-B817- 7952 [P&P] LOT 4188 (corresponding print)
  • Repository: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.print
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/cwp2003006384/PP/

Thanks for the information about General Wilcox. All information about these photos is welcomed.

However, you might look closely at the man on the left side of the photo. This seems to be in the same series, but not the same photo as the one of the cockfight above.
 
Last edited:
Expired Image Removed
Freedmen's Tent Camp Near Richmond, VA

This is a cropped version of the smaller photo from post #1.

0_0_2872_2166.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the information about General Wilcox. All information about these photos is welcomed.

However, you might look closely at the man on the left side of the photo. This seems to be in the same series, but not the same photo as the one above.
Okay, so I'm an idiot. Which is the photo in the same series as the cockfight? Is it the burial of union dead? I'm curious to see what you're seeing. Is it a photographer's assistant inserting himself in the image like they do?

By the way, edited to add, these are great photos. Thank you for posting!
 
Expired Image Removed 2nd Rhode Island Camp at Camp Brightwood
On the left is Capt. B. S. Brown. In the center is Lt. John P. Shaw, killed in action at the Wilderness, Virginia, May 5, 1864, and on the right is Lt. T. Fry. The "contrabands" with them are not named.

Expired Image Removed
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top