Color Guard v Signal Corp

MsJan

Cadet
Joined
Apr 20, 2024
Regarding my ancestor as Color Guard, 1862 Battle of Prairie Grove, Arkansas: Is Color Guard the same as Signal Corp? I found a photo with my ancestor's name, but it say Signal Corp and I wondered if it could be him. Thanks.
 
Signal Corps is part of the Army that handled flag and telegraph communications. Not officially formed until 1863. Only the Army has a Signal Corps.

Color Guard is the part of a regiment that carries the national and regimental flags, plus a few men assigned to protect them. Important when the flags are such an important symbol, guide, and rally point.

Whenever the military presents flags at an event that's also a Color Guard, through not necessarily a fixed part of a unit as in the ACW. All branches of service have Color Guards.
 
The Color Guard are not signallers. The two regimental flags were not used for signalling but at as a rallying point for the regiment, and also a matter of honor to keep them flying. They also allowed the generals to see which regiments were where, especially on a battlefield with otherwise poor viisbility when the shooting started. Officers carried the flags - the national flag (Queens/Kings color - (national flag) in Britain) - and the regimental flag. Up to 8 NCOs, usually corporals, were the color guard - a very prestigious position. Their job was to protect those colors, with their lives, if necessary, as loss of the colors was a regimental disgrace.
1726077361880.jpeg


The position was in the center of the front line, line companies either side IOW - in the thick of the fighting. The number of line companies would differ with the regimental strength in the field.

The Signal Corps is a separate organisation formed to pass light or flag signals - visual signalling - to higher formation army commanders in the field. They were specialists. During the Civil War, this was often augmented with line telegraph equipment whenever possible - no, not telephone, morse code transmissions as on the railroad telegraph, as well as the passage of written messages. They were not in the line, as such (In the line communications were by regimental drum or bugle).

It is possible that he joined as an infantryman but was seconded to the Signal Corps either because he had worked for the railroad (telegraph) and not told anyone (or wasn't asked!) or was used as a messenger, mounted or foot, when the need arose.

*It was also a way of using otherwise fit men suffering from 'battle fatigue' (PTSD), without disgrace or discharging them.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top