Civil War bridge burns again

CMWinkler

Colonel
Retired Moderator
Joined
Oct 17, 2012
Location
Middle Tennessee
Civil War bridge burns again

Commemoration of Gettysburg campaign
Intelligencer Journal
Lancaster New Era
Updated Jun 29, 2013 00:04
Columbia

  • Expired Image Removed
    The Susquehanna Travellers perform for the crowd at John W...
Expired Image Removed
Originally Published Jun 28, 2013 23:31
By DAN NEPHIN
Staff Writer
[email protected]

As she waited with several friends on the deck of the present Columbia-Wrightsville bridge for the commemoration of the burning of the old Columbia-Wrightsville bridge 150 years ago, Nancy Peterson reflected.

While she's not much of a history buff, she is interested in the Civil War.

She knows the story of the burning of the bridge in 1863 — even if the intent was to destroy a section of it, not the entire structure.

"I though, they cut off their nose to spite their face, but they did it for a good cause," said Peterson, 63, of Manheim Township resident, from her folding chair.

To thwart advancing rebel troops intent on capturing the mile-long covered bridge, a plan was put in place.

Able-bodied men and boys would fight the Confederates until forced back. Then, a 200-foot section of the bridge would be destroyed to keep the Confederates from crossing the river.

Fighting began about 5:30 p.m. June 28, a Sunday. About an hour later, Union Col. Jacob Frick ordered the volunteers to retreat and blow up the bridge section.

Four men, John Q. Denny, John Rich, John Lockard and Jacob Miller, lit the fuses.

The powder exploded, but the bridge remained. The men then used torches, but the flames spread across the wooden structure, burning for four hours.

One man, a black defender, died in the fight and about 16 men were wounded.

Down the bridge a bit from Peterson, as crews began lighting braziers of wood on the piers of the old bridge, David Snyder was talking "what if" with his wife, Rachel.

"I'm a huge Civil War aficionado," said Snyder, 46, who builds sets at Dutch Apple Dinner Theatre.

He used to think that, had the Confederates crossed the bridge, the course of the war might have changed. Now, with more reading, he doesn't think that would have been the case.

"For (the Confederates) to have held the bridge would have been a huge endeavor," he said.

While the burning of the bridge gets romanticized, he said the real stories are the saving of Wrightsville from fire and the remarkable stories of student and black brigades who fought the Confederates.

For the rest: http://lancasteronline.com/article/local/866903_Civil-War-bridge-burns-again.html
 
My pastor went to see this with his family (he is a CW history buff), and said that it was really cool, but it took forever for the guys lighting the braziers of wood on top of the bridge's pilings, because they had to row across the river to do it. Everytime I drive out to Gettysburg, all I have to do is look to my left to see the pilings of the bridge from the Route 30 bridge.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top