California Soldier

Caption suggests that the subject is deceased. In portraiture of the early 1860s it was not uncommon for photographers to use clamps to steady the subject for long exposures, particularly if the light wasn't so good. Holding up an embalmed body would involve much more than the clamp indicated I would think.
 
He's dead now, but I doubt if he was dead at the time the image was taken. Would they have had such a clean, well fitted fancy uniform to photograph a cadaver in? He's wearing a frock coat with trim. If he was in battle, he would have had something different (and it would be dirtier).
 
Here's another discussion of another standing soldier, trying to decide whether he's dead:

http://www.authentic-campaigner.com...-nice-regulation-armed-soldier-portrait/page2

The image under discussion in that thread is shown on page 1, but I linked to page 2 because there's information about the unusual position of the non-gun hand in post #16, and also a more obvious post-mortem of a soldier in uniform--eyes closed, arms folded--toward the bottom.

Edited to add: I think the California soldier in this thread is alive.
 
Good find James B. White. The contrast of the post-mortem image to the "California" soldier is great.
 
I would be interested to see anyone pose a corpse, standing, upright, and make it look like it's living and conscious. Ain't seen one yet, but I'm open to being convinced.

Weekend at Bernie's was not a documentary.
 
Last edited:

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top