dfostermem
Corporal
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2024
- Location
- Tennessee
I have read much on battles which almost always have narrative at a relatively high level. The narration states General ordered some movement, requested support, etc. but I have found nothing that details how those communications were actually made. Does anyone have knowledge of how communications were executed during a major battle or any good references?
As an example: At Shiloh Beauregard managed the battle from rear the first day from his headquarters or command post. He would need to stay abreast of the action across front, make decisions, generate orders, etc. How extensive was his headquarters staff and how was it organized? Was there a pool of couriers who were standing by to carry messages and how large would that pool be? Did General have a primary staff who was responsible for writing out message and assigning to a courier? For incoming couriers, was there a staffer who triaged and screened messages?
I guess I'm trying to understand mechanics and the number of personnel required just for the communications. I would assume that had to be similar to modern Incident Command Posts where various functions are divided out and issues addressed at lowest level but elevated as required.
Given the size of Shiloh battlefield, I would think communications were primarily by couriers on horseback. I would think there were quite a few soldiers tied up in courier duties. If the message was significant enough, did they ever send multiple couriers to make sure message was not lost?
Did the commands in the field have their own staff performing command post duties and their own couriers?
Were the messages verbal or written on paper?
Sorry about the multiple questions but I wanted to try to give a feel for the level of detail I looking at. Without an effective communication network there can be no control and everything I have read addresses the command and control but never covers the associated communications that made it happen.
As an example: At Shiloh Beauregard managed the battle from rear the first day from his headquarters or command post. He would need to stay abreast of the action across front, make decisions, generate orders, etc. How extensive was his headquarters staff and how was it organized? Was there a pool of couriers who were standing by to carry messages and how large would that pool be? Did General have a primary staff who was responsible for writing out message and assigning to a courier? For incoming couriers, was there a staffer who triaged and screened messages?
I guess I'm trying to understand mechanics and the number of personnel required just for the communications. I would assume that had to be similar to modern Incident Command Posts where various functions are divided out and issues addressed at lowest level but elevated as required.
Given the size of Shiloh battlefield, I would think communications were primarily by couriers on horseback. I would think there were quite a few soldiers tied up in courier duties. If the message was significant enough, did they ever send multiple couriers to make sure message was not lost?
Did the commands in the field have their own staff performing command post duties and their own couriers?
Were the messages verbal or written on paper?
Sorry about the multiple questions but I wanted to try to give a feel for the level of detail I looking at. Without an effective communication network there can be no control and everything I have read addresses the command and control but never covers the associated communications that made it happen.