C3 Command, Control, Communications: Communications During Major Battles, How did that work?

dfostermem

Corporal
Joined
Dec 21, 2024
Location
Tennessee
I have read much on battles which almost always have narrative at a relatively high level. The narration states General ordered some movement, requested support, etc. but I have found nothing that details how those communications were actually made. Does anyone have knowledge of how communications were executed during a major battle or any good references?

As an example: At Shiloh Beauregard managed the battle from rear the first day from his headquarters or command post. He would need to stay abreast of the action across front, make decisions, generate orders, etc. How extensive was his headquarters staff and how was it organized? Was there a pool of couriers who were standing by to carry messages and how large would that pool be? Did General have a primary staff who was responsible for writing out message and assigning to a courier? For incoming couriers, was there a staffer who triaged and screened messages?

I guess I'm trying to understand mechanics and the number of personnel required just for the communications. I would assume that had to be similar to modern Incident Command Posts where various functions are divided out and issues addressed at lowest level but elevated as required.

Given the size of Shiloh battlefield, I would think communications were primarily by couriers on horseback. I would think there were quite a few soldiers tied up in courier duties. If the message was significant enough, did they ever send multiple couriers to make sure message was not lost?

Did the commands in the field have their own staff performing command post duties and their own couriers?

Were the messages verbal or written on paper?

Sorry about the multiple questions but I wanted to try to give a feel for the level of detail I looking at. Without an effective communication network there can be no control and everything I have read addresses the command and control but never covers the associated communications that made it happen.
 
I have read much on battles which almost always have narrative at a relatively high level. The narration states General ordered some movement, requested support, etc. but I have found nothing that details how those communications were actually made. Does anyone have knowledge of how communications were executed during a major battle or any good references?

As an example: At Shiloh Beauregard managed the battle from rear the first day from his headquarters or command post. He would need to stay abreast of the action across front, make decisions, generate orders, etc. How extensive was his headquarters staff and how was it organized? Was there a pool of couriers who were standing by to carry messages and how large would that pool be? Did General have a primary staff who was responsible for writing out message and assigning to a courier? For incoming couriers, was there a staffer who triaged and screened messages?

I guess I'm trying to understand mechanics and the number of personnel required just for the communications. I would assume that had to be similar to modern Incident Command Posts where various functions are divided out and issues addressed at lowest level but elevated as required.

Given the size of Shiloh battlefield, I would think communications were primarily by couriers on horseback. I would think there were quite a few soldiers tied up in courier duties. If the message was significant enough, did they ever send multiple couriers to make sure message was not lost?

Did the commands in the field have their own staff performing command post duties and their own couriers?

Were the messages verbal or written on paper?

Sorry about the multiple questions but I wanted to try to give a feel for the level of detail I looking at. Without an effective communication network there can be no control and everything I have read addresses the command and control but never covers the associated communications that made it happen.

You have picked the wrong battle for CSA command & control.

Beauregard's battle deployment made effective command & control impossible.

The tactical objective was to force Grant's left away from the Tennessee River landing. Forrest & other commanders on Beauregard's right did not receive orders to attack. They eventually did so on their own responsibility.

An example of effective communication leading to effective command & control occurred on June 23, 1863, the first day of the Tullahoma Campaign.

A week earlier, a fullly worked up Beardslee Repeating Telegram column arrived at Army of the Cumberland's HQ in Murfreesboro TN.

IMG_0191.gif

Unlike the Telegraph, which required 10 volt wet cell batteries, Beardslees utilized a magneto to generate electricity.

IMG_0192.gif

The Beardslee was a system. The dedicated wagons held miles of wire on spools. Oak poles with an iron spike on one end & a hook on the other facilitated stringing the single wire.

IMG_0105.webp

Rosecran's plan was to sweep around Bragg's right.

teturn to Manchester drawing.webp

As this illustration of Eli Lilly's battery, attached to Wilder's Brigade, indicates, a 500 year rain event (TVA) turned roads into quagmires & every creek into a raging torrent. The struggle up to the Highland Plateau from Bradyville reduced Palmer's advance to a crawl.

IMG_0770.webp


In a typical example of the entrepreneurial spirit of the Army of the Cumberland, Col. Wilder had mounted his infantry & equipped his men with seven shot Spencer repeating rifles. Lilly's six 3" rifles & a battery of 12 pound mountain howitzers were attached. Lilly ammunition boxes were repacked, replacing long range rounds with canister.

IMG_0052.webp


Where I-24 cuts up to the Highland Plateau today is Hoover's Gap. General Thomas expected forcing the gap would take tow days & cost 2,000 casualties. Wilder blitzed the gap, with each of his 2,000 wielding three times the firepower of Confederate General Bate's men who made repeated attempts to sweep what they thought was dismounted cavalry aside.

IMG_2541.webp

Behind that opening in the Rutherford County courthouse clock tower were very large telescopes facing east & west. Signal men stood on the platform to send flag & torches signals along a 45 mile east west along Rosecrans' front facing the Army of Tennessee. The unprecedented rain event shut the visual signal network down.

When Thomas received the report that Wilder had broke through Hoover's Gap & held it open, he contacted Rosecrans. The long, carefully planned sweep around Bragg's right was stalled. A golden opportunity to breakthrough the center demanded a redirection.

The Beardslee operators had established a line made up of five mile nodes. In the dark, in a sterling example of Col. Boyde's OODA Circle of decisive tactical decision making, Rosecrans redirected the entire eastern flank. Orders were written & communicated overnight. Thomas' corps poured through Bragg's center… incredibly, it was 48 hours before Bragg was aware that his entire right flank had been turned.

The Army of Tennessee's forty mile wide front was anchored by the elaborate fortifications at Tullahoma TN. His plan was to force Rosecrans to beat his army bloody attempting breach the miles of elaborate earthworks guarding the Army of Tennessee's reserve supply depot.

IMG_0013.webp

In Bragg's rear was the intimidating mass of Monteagel Mountain. Blasted through the mountain in the 1840's by gangs of highly skilled slaves, the Cumberland Mountain Tunnel is still the single track link between Nashville and Chattanooga. The Lightening Brigade burning warehouses at the northern end of the tunnel was the smoke signal that alerted Bragg to the peril of being completely cut off. It was only the knee deep mud that allowed him to win the race for the Tennessee River.

On July 4th the Army of the Cumberland made the laborious climb to the top of Monteagle Mountain & through the 2,000 foot long RR tunnel. The riches of hogs, corn & remounts in Middle Tennessee & connection to Louisville KY were secured with the loss of 550 men. It was the Beardslee Repeating Telegraph units & the realtime communication of intel & orders that made it all possible.

On July 23, 1863 General Stanley, commander of the A of the C's cavalry, ordered a concentration at Rover.

IMG_3480.webp

Today, you can enjoy a country ham, red eye gravy & biscuits breakfast at the Fried Tater restaurant in the original Rover post office / country store. You would probably use Google or the nav system in the car to find your way.

IMG_2745.webp

This is General Polk's map of the Army of Tennessee front in Middle Tennessee June 1863. Both Polk, who commanded the western area, & army Commander Bragg's HQ's were in Shelbyville. Along the top edge of the map is the A of the C's line spanning 50 miles from east to west. One of the smudges with a flag on the upper left edge marks The Works at Triune.

Triune_Earthworks_v_1517411838.webp


This formidable three miles of "rifle pits" surmount a ridge that dominates the skyline. The highest point, where the magazine is, marks a stone faced star shaped bastion.

IMG_2720.webp

The Triune Ridge looking west from a high point in Murfreesboro.

IMG_2724.webp

Pilot Knob, adjacent to Readyville can be seen on the eastern horizon, 8 miles from the Courthouse Signal Station & 25 miles from Triune.

IMG_0189.webp


24 / 7 signalists had thousands of square miles under observation. On cold, clear nights torch signals could be sent &…

IMG_2534.gif

received across the 41 miles between Fort Transit Station to Fort Negley station in Nashville.

IMG_2535.webp

If you look carefully, the improbable tree house signal station can be seen to the left of the Fort Negley Flag.

IMG_0767.webp

I have no idea why this posts sideways. Unlike General Polk's map that was had drawn, dark age monk fashion, by an Irish civil engineer. There was only one of them. "Rover" is nowhere on Polk's map… nor is little else.

Contrast that with Map #1 of Shelbyville & Vicinity lithographed in volume for issue to General Stanley / his cavalry commander / General Grainer who commanded the 10,000 Reserve Corps that manned the Works at Triune & subordinate commanders.

In Rosecrans' elaborate plan that involved a front (+/-) 80 road miles wide, the advance on Shelbyville was a feint. It was exactly what Bragg was supposed to anticipate. A tissue of outright lies spread by word of mouth, news papers & empty camps fooled even the mighty Forrest. Orders for Stanley & Grainer to mass their forces in the early morning of July 23 at the crossroads where the Rover store still stands.

There is no way to exaggerate how existential the A of the C's topographical office was to the success of the Tullahoma Campaign & Sherman's army group all the way to Atlanta, Savannah, across the Carolinas & on to the Grand Review in Washington.

IMG_0052.webp
 
Last edited:
Did General have a primary staff who was responsible for writing out message and assigning to a courier? For incoming couriers, was there a staffer who triaged and screened messages?
To possibly address some of these questions asked.

Below is a link that tells the experiences of Pvte. William Youngblood of the 15th. AL. who was assigned as Longstreet's courier at Gettysburg, and who delivered verbal messages between different commanders in the field.


Assigned field couriers were probably those soldiers in the best positions to observe, and attest to, the behavior and conduct of field commanders during engagements.

Thought one could also generate a possible further discussion on the merits and pitfalls of couriers relaying verbal orders, as opposed to written ones, in combat conditions.

Personally think the significant role performed by field couriers is understated in the reporting of the CW.
 
Last edited:
As I think you've hit on, messages could only really go to defined locations. The electric telegraph saw very little use in battle, and the best way of communicating was via optical telegraph. Couriers were used, but were slow and liable to get lost.

This is a signals detachment at Antietam:

1764407751365.webp


On the signals station are a man with a flag and a man with a telescope. The telescope is fixed on another signals station, who was a telescope fixed on this one. The pair can communicate by flag movements. On the ground is a man who writes down the signals, and the signal officer is also up top. He also generally watched the area and sent signals to HQ etc. warning of enemy movements etc.

Since they're paired signals stations, they were hub and spoke. Here is the signals network at Antietam:

1764408207797.webp


The hub of the network was on the hill with the Pry House. It communicated with the signals stations on the right. Another station on the eastern edge of the hill communicated with Burnside via the Mountain station. Another one shot back to South Mountain, and the chain there reached the electric telegraph network and hence to Washington.

There were a number of staff officers at various command posts responsible for communicating. Each had a number of orderlies detached from the cavalry. Messages and orders would be carried by these orderlies between tactical CP's and signals stations etc.

McClellan had two pincipal staff officers for communicating; Col Willams (ISTR) remained at the main command post near the Pry House, and Col Colburn travelled with McClellan's tactical CP. This meant corps commanders could communicate to a stationary main CP, which itself communicated with McClellan. This freed McClellan to move around the field as needed, as long as he kept the main CP informed as to his location.

Each major subordinate command had a staff officer from GHQ responsible for communications from the corps to main CP, thus:

Right wing: BG, Marcy (the COS), BG Buford and Maj von Hammerstein were riding Hooker on the right
Left wing: Col Sacket and Lt Col Key were riding Hooker on the left
1st Corps: ?
2nd Corps: Capt Lowell and Lt Cushing
5th Corps: ?
6th Corps: Capt McMahon
9th Corps: Lt Wilson?
12th Corps: Capt Forsyth
Cavalry Division: Capt Custer and Lt Martin

So, if McClellan wanted to give an order to the far side of the field, he'd issue it via Hudson, and an orderly would carry it for transmission to a signals station. It would travel via the signals network to main CP and onwards to the destination signals station. There an orderly would carry it to a staff officer, who would carry it to the staff of the corps commander.

The Army of the Potomac has far more advanced than the western armies.
 
Command & Control Battle of Chickamauga.

I suggest reading Connelly's Autumn of Glory for insights into the profound breakdown of Bragg's command & control during the night preceding the third day of the battle. General Longstreet, who had arrived late that day, was given command of the army's left. He received no orders whatsoever for the dawn attack Bragg ordered… neither did General Polk commanding the center. In modern terms, Bragg lacked executive ability. Once again, the contrast with the Army of the Cumberland was stark.

When the A of the C reached the north bank of the Tennessee River, it deployed along a front 70 miles wide from Dayton in the Sequachie Valley to Muscle Shoals in the west. Signalists using flags & torches sent & received messages from flank to flank in 45 minutes. General Granger, who commanded the force from a tavern across the river from Chattanooga created his own flag system.

The thirty miles of Tennessee River he commanded was impossible to traverse. Using black & white flags Grainger was able to monitor Bragg's actions in Chattanooga, scout up & down river without leaving HQ.

IMG_0188.webp

As he prepared for the challenging crossing of the Tennessee, Rosecrans was in full knowledge of Bragg's dispositions. Once again, the failure of Wheeler's videttes, Bragg had no idea that two corps had crossed the Tennessee & were approaching Chattanooga. As at Tullahoma, he had no choice but to make a precipitant retreat… which Grainger described the preparations for in detail in messages to Rosecrans.

IMG_0185.webp

Bodies of Confederate infantry gathered before the works at Corinth MS.

Rosecrans had fought three successful desperate battles. In each of them he became overwrought, charged around mounted in full view of the enemy & issued incomprehensible orders in a jackhammer stutter. The sight of the general splattered with the brains & blood of staff officers was electrifying to his men… the nonsense orders had the opposite effect on the officers.

When alerted to Bragg's approach, Rosecrans was able to recall Thomas via the visual flag network. Initially, mounted couriers spent as long as 36 improbable hours one way between his HQ & Chattanooga. After the visual flag connection was established, transit time out & back was reduced to 13 minutes.

Future president Garfield was Rosecrans' chief of staff. In order to avoid another display of frantic behavior, an ingenious system was developed. Essentially, it was a grid system that any war game board player would recognize. Mounted couriers & staff officers connected the A of the C HQ in the field with commanders all along the battle line. The HQ was connected to Chattanooga & onward to the Secretary of War & President Lincoln by telegraph.

As is well known, a mixup in a report created a failure of situational awareness at Rosecrans' HQ. Based on the graphic display, an imagined misalignment resulted in a fatal withdrawal that opened a hole.

IMG_3524.webp

On their own responsibility, Longstreet & Hood ordered an attack that serendipitously ran straight into the gap Rosecrans orders had created.

From the field A of the C HQ, orders were dispatched to Chattanooga to prepare for the arrival of the army retreating through the Rossville Gap. In a matter of hours, a detailed report of the withdrawal reached the Sec of War & Lincoln who were together. Within hours, two corps of the Army of the Potomac were packing up & marching to railheads. Within 24 hours, trains were loaded & steaming toward Nashville. This is an example of seamless command & control on a continental scale.
 
Last edited:
Command & Control Battle of Chattanooga & Missionary Ridge

Not only was Rosecrans connected to Nashville, the base at Cincinnati & Washington via telegraph, an integrated visual system was established. From the HQ on Champion Hill, artillery fire was directed at targets on Lookout Mountain to support Hooker's attack. From his HQ in the field on the face of the mountain, Hooker signaled to the battery at Moccasin Bend. The 20 Pound Parrotts had cut fuzes at 22 seconds had been ordered by General Thomas to bring indirect fire down on Confederate infantry climbing up on the Summertown Road.

IMG_2998.webp


Assistant Secretary of War Charles Dana was initially impressed with Rosecrans' organization of the Chattanooga defenses. However, in time the stress & his habitual frenetic activity with little or no sleep took its toll. Dana's eyes only dispatches directly to Lincoln logged his increasing alarm at Rosecns' deteriorating condition. Via telegraph Grant, commander of the Western Theater, was ordered to Chattanooga to take personal command of the army group gathering there.

From his HQ in Chattanooga Grant communicated directly with Burnside at Knoxville, Cumberland Gap, all up & down the Mississippi River watershed via telegraph. He dispatched Dana to East Tennessee to report on what was happening at Knoxville.

You can read Dana's encoded reports exactly as they were recorded in the dedicated log kept at the Washington Military Telegraph office. This is the ultimate original source.

Do yourself a favor, like Lincoln read the account of Missionary Ridge out loud. It is as close to experiencing what Lincoln & his cabinet members did that you will ever experience.

Read more here:

Link:

 
Last edited:
Hopefully I didn't overlook this in previous comments, but most higher level commands like division, corps, and army headquarters had a permanent escort company assigned to not only provide security but also serve as couriers to supplement the staff. These headquarters were generally farther from their subordinate elements and thus had more requirements for couriers to deliver orders. Brigades and regiments could manage communications with mounted staff given the commanders were generally right there with the unit.
Regiments had a major, lieutenant colonel, adjutant, and assistant quartermaster and commissary officers who were mounted and could provide assistance to command and control, but at this level, tactical communications were generally via voice or bugle/drum. At the level of command you're discussing, permanently or semipermanently assigned cavalry elements were critical to communication via written or verbal message. Division and higher levels also had similar staff positions but of higher rank plus additional roles like aides de camp and assistant adjutant general who supported the commander.
The federals really outpaced their southern counterparts with the development of field telegraph detachments. While CS commanders did use telegraph to communicate at army or department levels and sometimes tactical in certain areas like the coastal defense departments, they never go close to federal capabilities.
I think signal detachments using optical method like flags were adequately covered above. Both sides used that method profusely throughout the war whenever terrain and weather conditions permitted.
 
Hopefully I didn't overlook this in previous comments, but most higher level commands like division, corps, and army headquarters had a permanent escort company assigned to not only provide security but also serve as couriers to supplement the staff. These headquarters were generally farther from their subordinate elements and thus had more requirements for couriers to deliver orders. Brigades and regiments could manage communications with mounted staff given the commanders were generally right there with the unit.
Regiments had a major, lieutenant colonel, adjutant, and assistant quartermaster and commissary officers who were mounted and could provide assistance to command and control, but at this level, tactical communications were generally via voice or bugle/drum. At the level of command you're discussing, permanently or semipermanently assigned cavalry elements were critical to communication via written or verbal message. Division and higher levels also had similar staff positions but of higher rank plus additional roles like aides de camp and assistant adjutant general who supported the commander.
The federals really outpaced their southern counterparts with the development of field telegraph detachments. While CS commanders did use telegraph to communicate at army or department levels and sometimes tactical in certain areas like the coastal defense departments, they never go close to federal capabilities.
I think signal detachments using optical method like flags were adequately covered above. Both sides used that method profusely throughout the war whenever terrain and weather conditions permitted.

It occurs to me that the personalities of the army commanders set the tone for the use of exactly the same technologies. Rosecrans was very gregarious. He encouraged common soldiers to communicate directly with him, via the chain of command formally & person to person. The entrepreneurial nature of the transition from 14th Army Corps to Army of the Cumberland January to June 1863 is testimony to the open lines of communication that typified Rosecrans' command style.

Bragg, on the other hand… he didn't want to hear from you & you certainly did not want to hear from him. He & Polk lived a couple of blocks from each other in Shelbyville TN from January - June 1863. As commander of the First Corps responsible for the anticipated avenue of attack toward Shelbyville / Tullahoma, it would seem to be obvious that Bragg would have discussed his intentions in great detail during that time. As with every other instance, when Rosecrans advanced, corps commanders Polk & Hardee had only the vaguest of ideas what was expected of them.

The highly integrated mounted courier, visual & telegraphic signal network Rosecrans created & the far less one of the Army of Tennessee fit neatly into the personalities of the commanders. This is my opinion, but it is based on ample evidence.
 
Last edited:
Clearly there are differences between Federal versus Confederate. Also differences between theaters, commanders, and timeframe (early war versus late war).

Youngblood's account at Gettysburg was insightful from the viewpoint of the courier himself. While not giving a bigger picture in how the system was organized, it provides a fairly detailed account about how he was employed. I get the opinion he was individually assigned for task. I'll have to see if he can be located in Fold3 to see how well his role as a courier was documented - if at all. My guess is that the courier was viewed as a menial task rarely documented.

The paper on Battle of Chickamauga has a good bit concerning the subject regarding that battle. I appreciated how it covered different methods and limitations associated with each.

The concept of Escort and Cavalry Companies providing couriers is interesting and I need to look into that deeper.

It seems that this critical function was somewhat ad hoc and varied with each command. It only complicates getting a handle on it.

My primary focus has been Confederate army in W TN and N MS. Telegraph has been more along high level strategic. Haven't come across use of signal flags. Courier/messengers seems to be primary. I need to dig deeper into bugle/drum but I would think that would be a very limited in scope.

Has anyone ever come across any communication details in general battle orders or standard operational instructions concerning couriers/messengers? I seem to remember their being a communications annex in modern war planning.
 
Buglers & drummers transmitted the orders of commanders. They were indispensable & largely unsung.

I recommend Bugler Henry Campbell's diary. He was Eli Lilly's bugler. Lilly's battery was assigned to the Lightening Brigade. Campbell was in a unique position. He personally sounded the calls that passed on Lilly's orders. He was also in a unique position to observe events. The original is available online. It is an interesting read because Campbell includes maps & newspaper articles he found pertinent. It is not published on paper. Read more here.

Link:

 
Clearly there are differences between Federal versus Confederate. Also differences between theaters, commanders, and timeframe (early war versus late war).

Youngblood's account at Gettysburg was insightful from the viewpoint of the courier himself. While not giving a bigger picture in how the system was organized, it provides a fairly detailed account about how he was employed. I get the opinion he was individually assigned for task. I'll have to see if he can be located in Fold3 to see how well his role as a courier was documented - if at all. My guess is that the courier was viewed as a menial task rarely documented.

The paper on Battle of Chickamauga has a good bit concerning the subject regarding that battle. I appreciated how it covered different methods and limitations associated with each.

The concept of Escort and Cavalry Companies providing couriers is interesting and I need to look into that deeper.

It seems that this critical function was somewhat ad hoc and varied with each command. It only complicates getting a handle on it.

My primary focus has been Confederate army in W TN and N MS. Telegraph has been more along high level strategic. Haven't come across use of signal flags. Courier/messengers seems to be primary. I need to dig deeper into bugle/drum but I would think that would be a very limited in scope.

Has anyone ever come across any communication details in general battle orders or standard operational instructions concerning couriers/messengers? I seem to remember their being a communications annex in modern war planning.

Just how loud do you imagine somebody could shout? In fact, it was buglers & drummers who directly communicated the orders on the tactical level. In fact, horses would respond to the bugle calls with or without their riders. Read more here.

Link:


Link:

 
Do you think any of these methods were fast and accurate enough to give the army commander control over the battle once the decision to fight had been made? It seems to me the army commanders on both sides were very dependent on the corps and division commanders.
The problem did not exist to the same degree in naval engagements. Visibility was probably better and I think the ships all had flaggers.
 
Once it kicked off, army commanders were extremely dependent on their corps and division commanders. After a movement commenced, it would be impossible for an army level commander to direct multiple tactical battles unless he was present at the time of the action in person in a location where he had good visibility.
 
Clearly there are differences between Federal versus Confederate. Also differences between theaters, commanders, and timeframe (early war versus late war).

Youngblood's account at Gettysburg was insightful from the viewpoint of the courier himself. While not giving a bigger picture in how the system was organized, it provides a fairly detailed account about how he was employed. I get the opinion he was individually assigned for task. I'll have to see if he can be located in Fold3 to see how well his role as a courier was documented - if at all. My guess is that the courier was viewed as a menial task rarely documented.

The paper on Battle of Chickamauga has a good bit concerning the subject regarding that battle. I appreciated how it covered different methods and limitations associated with each.

The concept of Escort and Cavalry Companies providing couriers is interesting and I need to look into that deeper.

It seems that this critical function was somewhat ad hoc and varied with each command. It only complicates getting a handle on it.

My primary focus has been Confederate army in W TN and N MS. Telegraph has been more along high level strategic. Haven't come across use of signal flags. Courier/messengers seems to be primary. I need to dig deeper into bugle/drum but I would think that would be a very limited in scope.

Has anyone ever come across any communication details in general battle orders or standard operational instructions concerning couriers/messengers? I seem to remember their being a communications annex in modern war planning.
There is an Annex H for signal nowadays, but I've never read an instance of a formal signal order being issued. I know I've read particular guidance for communications as part of general orders or as part of campaign orders. I just can't for the life of me remember which campaign I'm trying to remember.

If you ever check detailed orders of battle, you'll see most division and corps headquarters had a dedicated company of cavalry. I recall specifically one of Polk's escort was a courier and played a role in the fiasco of orders and missed orders the second day of Chickamauga. CS units seemed to be mostly independent companies, but Union detachments seem to be detailed from a larger organization. Again, that's just my observation and not scientific by any means.
 
My experience from the Gettysburg campaign is that couriers and staff officers primarily communicated orders on a battlefield.

As for Confederate couriers (selected from the enlisted ranks), a brigadier general (brigade) was entitled to two, a major general (division) had six, a lieutenant general (corps) twelve, and the army commander had up to sixty. In addition, a corps commander and an army commander could access an assigned independent mounted detachment that acted as a combination bodyguard, provost guard and/or couriers as needed.

Trusted staff officers assigned to general officers (at the brigade, division, corps and army level) were also frequently used to communicate important orders, to include the adjutant general (AAG - chief of staff), inspector general (AIG) and two or more aides (ADC - aide-de-camp).
 
As I think you've hit on, messages could only really go to defined locations. The electric telegraph saw very little use in battle, and the best way of communicating was via optical telegraph. Couriers were used, but were slow and liable to get lost.

This is a signals detachment at Antietam:

View attachment 569038

On the signals station are a man with a flag and a man with a telescope. The telescope is fixed on another signals station, who was a telescope fixed on this one. The pair can communicate by flag movements. On the ground is a man who writes down the signals, and the signal officer is also up top. He also generally watched the area and sent signals to HQ etc. warning of enemy movements etc.

Since they're paired signals stations, they were hub and spoke. Here is the signals network at Antietam:

View attachment 569039

The hub of the network was on the hill with the Pry House. It communicated with the signals stations on the right. Another station on the eastern edge of the hill communicated with Burnside via the Mountain station. Another one shot back to South Mountain, and the chain there reached the electric telegraph network and hence to Washington.

There were a number of staff officers at various command posts responsible for communicating. Each had a number of orderlies detached from the cavalry. Messages and orders would be carried by these orderlies between tactical CP's and signals stations etc.

McClellan had two pincipal staff officers for communicating; Col Willams (ISTR) remained at the main command post near the Pry House, and Col Colburn travelled with McClellan's tactical CP. This meant corps commanders could communicate to a stationary main CP, which itself communicated with McClellan. This freed McClellan to move around the field as needed, as long as he kept the main CP informed as to his location.

Each major subordinate command had a staff officer from GHQ responsible for communications from the corps to main CP, thus:

Right wing: BG, Marcy (the COS), BG Buford and Maj von Hammerstein were riding Hooker on the right
Left wing: Col Sacket and Lt Col Key were riding Hooker on the left
1st Corps: ?
2nd Corps: Capt Lowell and Lt Cushing
5th Corps: ?
6th Corps: Capt McMahon
9th Corps: Lt Wilson?
12th Corps: Capt Forsyth
Cavalry Division: Capt Custer and Lt Martin

So, if McClellan wanted to give an order to the far side of the field, he'd issue it via Hudson, and an orderly would carry it for transmission to a signals station. It would travel via the signals network to main CP and onwards to the destination signals station. There an orderly would carry it to a staff officer, who would carry it to the staff of the corps commander.

The Army of the Potomac has far more advanced than the western armies.
The need for couriers is reduced but not eliminated. Any message passes through many men before it reaches the desired recipient.
Flagging from the front lines was too dangerous. And the field telegraph required a cumbersome set of chemical cells, which was called a battery in that era.
All these descriptions report that battlefield control was still stuck in the 18th century.
 
The need for couriers is reduced but not eliminated. Any message passes through many men before it reaches the desired recipient.
Flagging from the front lines was too dangerous. And the field telegraph required a cumbersome set of chemical cells, which was called a battery in that era.
All these descriptions report that battlefield control was still stuck in the 18th century.

In the west things were far more primitive, esepcially in the Army of the Tennessee.

Signals simplify matters. At both ends the courier only has to go from the signals station to the destination CP, typically a few hundred yards. This is far preferable to couriers trying to make their way across country.

Thinking about it, imagine if Pope had invested in creating a proper signals network. It would have given a lot more articulation in the army. Pope was fighting as if it were the 18th century, and McClellan the 19th.
 
IMG_0276.webp

Battle of Baton Rouge, August 5th 1862. National Museum of American History. Note the arc of the fire from the ironclad U.S.S. Essex. You might ask yourself how was it possible to fire over Union lines with any accuracy?

The Battle of Baton Rouge was not a major battle. However, it was a sterling example of the revolution in command & control that was taking place in the Western Theater.


IMG_2617.webp

As you can see on this map, General Breckenridge attacked with superior force against a Union landing force.

IMG_2617.webp

A covering force guarded the riverboat landing. Note the marks west of Lafayette Street. That is the edge of the bluff that the city sits on. The gunboats, including heavy hitters from the Mississippi Squadron had no view of the scene beyond Lafayette Street.

No doubt General Breckenridge attacked with the intention of forcing the landing party back into their bastion at the landing. He would then array his artillery along Lafayette Street & pound the flotilla, forcing it to withdraw marooning the landing force. That would have been an excellent plan a year ago.

IMG_2619.webp

A U. S. Navy gunboat signal party.

End Part 1.
 
Last edited:

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top