Burnside - anything good?

MikeyB

Sergeant
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
History will remember him mostly for Fredericksburg and he has other negatives associated to his name like the crater. But he hung around until 1864, so someone either really liked him or he was competent/performing decent service.

Did he have any successes? Knoxville? What are some of the good things this guy did that get buried because history remembers only Fredericksburg? Is he properly judged by history or is there a lot of good that we never hear about?
 
Besides Knoxville, Burnside performed well during the coastal campaign in Eastern North Carolina during the first half of 1862 albeit against weak and disorganized opposition. From most accounts, Burnside had a pleasant personality and worked well with other people which might explain his longevity as a general despite some of his not too stellar moments on the battlefield.
 
History will remember him mostly for Fredericksburg and he has other negatives associated to his name like the crater. But he hung around until 1864, so someone either really liked him or he was competent/performing decent service.

Did he have any successes? Knoxville? What are some of the good things this guy did that get buried because history remembers only Fredericksburg? Is he properly judged by history or is there a lot of good that we never hear about?
His coastal expedition in 1862 was pretty well-regarded. And he did fairly well in the Western Theater (culminating in the Knoxville Campaign).

In the end, he was a decent corps commander with a pretty good independent command record but kind of fizzled out as 1864 wore on (although the quality of his subordinates left something to be desired as well and it didn't help that the best of the lot kept getting killed like Stevens, Reno, Rodman, and Stevenson).

Ryan
 
His coastal expedition in 1862 was pretty well-regarded. And he did fairly well in the Western Theater (culminating in the Knoxville Campaign).

In the end, he was a decent corps commander with a pretty good independent command record but kind of fizzled out as 1864 wore on (although the quality of his subordinates left something to be desired as well and it didn't help that the best of the lot kept getting killed like Stevens, Reno, Rodman, and Stevenson).

Ryan
was a big part of the fizzling the discord w/ Meade over seniority and the independent IX corp status? grant could have handled this better?
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top