Blowback

David Ireland

Corporal
Joined
Nov 29, 2017
Did Lee's invasion of Maryland hurt his cause of inducing the North to allow the secession by making them believe it was going to be a war of aggression against the US, as opposed to a peaceful secession?

How many copperheads changed after he invaded the North?

Were copperheads mostly northern Democrats?
 
It was already a war of aggression against the north before Lincoln took office.

The war started before Lincoln was inaugurated. In 1859–60, the Secretary of War, John Floyd, shipped 115,000 muskets and rifled muskets to southern armories, so that they would be ready to hand. When he attempted to ship gun tubes (unmounted cannon), a clerk in the War Department complained, and Floyd quickly resigned and rode into his native Virginia. In many southern states, the contents of armories were seized in the first week of January 1861, by so-called state troops. Also seized were Post offices, Custom Houses, money and fortifications. On January 8th, 1861, so-called state troops of Florida and Alabama attempted to seize Forts Barrancas and McRee, with their cannon and about 20,000 lbs. of gunpowder. The young Federal Lieutenant in command had his men fire over the heads of the state troop who scurried back to Pensacola as fast as their legs would carry them. On January 10th, he had the guns spiked, and as they evacuated, and blew up the powder magazine. His company pulled out to Fort Pickens in the harbor, where they held out for more than three months until relieved.

On January 9th, 1861, cadets from the Citadel, the state military academy of South Carolina, fired on Star of the West, an unarmed merchant vessel attempting to deliver reinforcements and supplies to Fort Sumter.
 
Did Lee's invasion of Maryland hurt his cause of inducing the North to allow the secession by making them believe it was going to be a war of aggression against the US, as opposed to a peaceful secession?

How many copperheads changed after he invaded the North?

Were copperheads mostly northern Democrats?
Anti war democrats did well in the November 1862 elections such has winning the gubernatorial election in New York. Ohio had anti war govenor Valadigingham ( sp?) until he was exiled to the Confederacy.
There were anti draft riots in early July 1863 in New York, Boston and some smaller cities in Wisconsin.
There was definitely an anti war faction in the Democratic Party in the 1864 presidential election but at the Democratic Party Convention after much debate the drafted former General George McCellen who publicly stated he would not allow an independent Confederate nation.
The anti war Democrats didn't seem to be adversely affected by the battle of Antietiam but they never composed a majority of the free state electorate.
The majority of the Democratic Party. voters in the free states appeared to be in favor of the war to the extent that they would not allow for the acquiescence of an independent Confederate nation.
Leftyhunter
 
To most Unionists, the War was always about 'Reunion'. The restoration of Constitutional authority in the rebellious states, which, logically, required an invasion of states in rebellion, to physically restore Constitutional Law,

As noted by leftyhunter, I think few minds were changed by any invasions during the War, North or South.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top