Biologicál Warfare






Cheers,
USS ALASKA
 
Thanks, @USS ALASKA for posting these previous CWT threads. Andy Hall used to post here and was a huge advocate of primary source history. Yet, he provides none in any of the old threads.

Neither does anyone else. A Non-Confederate Kentuckian who ran to Canada and dreamt up a plot by himself does not constitute "Confederate Biological Warfare".

Nice try, though.
 
Recall reading about one isolated incident involving Confederates deliberately using a form of biological warfare.

Sherman wrote, following the fall of Vicksburg, that as his force approached Jackson he found retreating Confederates had deliberately poisoned the local wells and ponds by placing dead animal carcasses in these water sources. Some have claimed that this tactic was ordered by Johnston, but personally would be surprised if he did.

Suspect there may also have been isolated incidents of intentional water poisoning occurring by retreating Confederates during 'Sherman's March to the Sea' in late '64, too.

(Interestingly, the U.S. War Dept. issued General Orders No. 100, dated Apr. 24, '63, to regulate the warfare conduct of the Union Army, which included a provision that did not permit the military 'to use poisoning in any way.')
 
Last edited:
Thanks, @USS ALASKA for posting these previous CWT threads. Andy Hall used to post here and was a huge advocate of primary source history. Yet, he provides none in any of the old threads.

Neither does anyone else. A Non-Confederate Kentuckian who ran to Canada and dreamt up a plot by himself does not constitute "Confederate Biological Warfare".

Nice try, though.
"Non-Confederate"? A guy who supports Confederates is a Confederate.

Screenshot 2025-02-16 9.50.01 PM.png
 
Not biological, but chemical warfare, by both sides, is documented and discussed in detail in a book published in 2015.
Villainous Compounds & Chemical Weapons in The American Civil War.
Guy R. Hasegawa.
If your library provides access to the EBSCO Discovery Service
1741394161999.png
, then you may have access to this book as an E-book.
 
"Non-Confederate"? A guy who supports Confederates is a Confederate.

Screenshot 2025-02-16 9.50.01 PM.png

Someone may be a Confederate sympathizer without being a Confederate because they are operating entirely without sanction or instructions from the Confederate military or government.

However, based on the text quoted in your post, Blackburn was not simply a sympathizer, but actually employed by the Confederate government (or at least Confederate state governments). Whether he eventually went rogue is another matter. Confederate agents did attempt to burn New York City so a Confederate plot to spread yellow fever isn't inconceivable.
 
Someone may be a Confederate sympathizer without being a Confederate because they are operating entirely without sanction or instructions from the Confederate military or government.

However, based on the text quoted in your post, Blackburn was not simply a sympathizer, but actually employed by the Confederate government (or at least Confederate state governments). Whether he eventually went rogue is another matter. Confederate agents did attempt to burn New York City so a Confederate plot to spread yellow fever isn't inconceivable.
I've done further reading since, and he was an aide to Sterling Price as well.
 
A Union doctor investigating one of the northern prison camps (Camp Douglas?) reported that the conditions that caused so many deaths were intentional. I'll try to find that report.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top