Artillery cannon wheels

I recall reading in the Artillerists' Companion that the wheels were dished so that dirt, mud, etc. would be thrown to the outside but, more importantly, wheel dishes essentially make the carriage wider and more stable/stronger without having to lengthen the axletree.
 
I recall reading in the Artillerists' Companion that the wheels were dished so that dirt, mud, etc. would be thrown to the outside but, more importantly, wheel dishes essentially make the carriage wider and more stable/stronger without having to lengthen the axletree.
From an engineering standpoint, I was inclined to think the dish in the wheels was to cause a stress bias in the spokes that would exist in the opposite direction as what would be imposed by side loading from going around a corner. (yawn) The effect would be a wheel that may not be quite as strong in a straight line, but more durable overall because it can handle more side loading. That said, I have no desire to find the data and run the numbers on these wheels anytime soon so there is a decent window that says I'm wrong. As an engineer once said, "In God we trust, everyone else better bring your numbers."
 
Gibbons ( page 181) in alludes to that, I think. "The wheels are made with a certain convexity called the dish. The obliquity of the spokes gives elasticity to the wheel and protects it from shocks which, were the spokes in the same plane, would destroy it."
So, that's a different dynamic than what I was describing, but the two kind of go along with each other. He's describing it as a spring, which helps in every direction. In his explanation, the dish could go either way, but facing them outward offers the advantage of stability when cornering. For something I never cared about, I'm getting way too interested .:bounce: Thanks
 
So, the PBS NOVA links don't work for me. Everything I find comes up behind a paywall, or non existent. It would be an interesting watch. In my post I wasn't giving credence for field repair-ability because the tires were a shrink fit on the wheel to keep everything in compression (exactly the opposite of today's modern spoked bicycle wheel). If they can't squeeze it all back together, the wheel would be considerably weaker. Did they have smith's and/or wheelwright's in the field close enough to do this type of work?

IMG_0408.jpeg


The Cason attached to each gun carried a spare wheel & a limber pole.

On a number of occasions I have seen or participated in shrinking a tire onto a wheel. I am willing to believe that it was something analogous to mounting a modern tire.

As a child I saw my dad & his uncles mount a set of automobile tires. It involved a great deal of time & effort. If I recall correctly, the last time I replaced a set of tires at a shop it took about 45 minutes.

A battery's artificers could use spare parts to repair a wheel. However, the wheelwrights in the artillery reserve would have been the preferred method.

An artificer standing next to a battery wagon.

During a lull in the Battle of Stones River the Chicago Board of Trade Battery recovered a broken down cannon. The battery wagon carried spare parts for a carriage. During the night artificers of the CBTB repaired the captured gun. From that point onward, there were seven guns in the battery.

Artillery batteries were traveling crafts fairs. After traveling the 30 miles from Nashville to Murfreesboro TN on the MacAdamized Pike (toll road) half of the 125 (+/-) horses in a battery had to be reshod & tires replaced on some wheels. The iron horse shoes & wheel tires were, in effect, sanded away by the crushed gravel road surface.

The Union farriers had a distinct advantage over their CSA peers: manufactured horse shoes. Making shoes from bar stock a master farrier was expected to shoe 4-6 horses in a 12 hour day. Farriery is a physically taxing business. That being said, with manufactured horse shoes it takes an hour to completely re-shoe a horse.


CSA farriers scavenged cast off shoes or took them from dead horses.

Note: My tech department is having a sleep over with her friends. However, for a very reasonable contribution you can get a PBS Passport. That not only gets you access to NOVA, there is an entire library of PBS shows. There were dozens of links for each show when I looked them up.
 
Last edited:
Here is a wheelwright's explanation for why wagon wheels are built with a concave section.

hills/wheelwrights/#:~:text=Dish%2520Wheel%253A%2520Waggon%2520Wheels%2520were,2%E2%80%93Spokes%2520fitted%2520into%2520it.
 
Good afternoon,
New poster here.
Why did the wheels of the field carriages have 14 spokes? 360 degrees is not evenly divided by 14. Inquiring minds want to know .......

Here is just about everything you want to know about wagon wheels.


Wheels are conical so that the sides of a wagon or carriage can be wider.
 
From an engineering standpoint, I was inclined to think the dish in the wheels was to cause a stress bias in the spokes that would exist in the opposite direction as what would be imposed by side loading from going around a corner. (yawn) The effect would be a wheel that may not be quite as strong in a straight line, but more durable overall because it can handle more side loading. That said, I have no desire to find the data and run the numbers on these wheels anytime soon so there is a decent window that says I'm wrong. As an engineer once said, "In God we trust, everyone else better bring your numbers."

According to the Worshipful Company of Wheelwrights, wheels are dished so that the sides of a wagon or carriage could be wider. By angling the axil it made the wheel more secure.

This is absolutely the best wheel & spoke reference I have found:

 
View attachment 510448

The Cason attached to each gun carried a spare wheel & a limber pole.

On a number of occasions I have seen or participated in shrinking a tire onto a wheel. I am willing to believe that it was something analogous to mounting a modern tire.

As a child I saw my dad & his uncles mount a set of automobile tires. It involved a great deal of time & effort. If I recall correctly, the last time I replaced a set of tires at a shop it took about 45 minutes.

A battery's artificers could use spare parts to repair a wheel. However, the wheelwrights in the artillery reserve would have been the preferred method.

An artificer standing next to a battery wagon.

During a lull in the Battle of Stones River the Chicago Board of Trade Battery recovered a broken down cannon. The battery wagon carried spare parts for a carriage. During the night artificers of the CBTB repaired the captured gun. From that point onward, there were seven guns in the battery.

Artillery batteries were traveling crafts fairs. After traveling the 30 miles from Nashville to Murfreesboro TN on the MacAdamized Pike (toll road) half of the 125 (+/-) horses in a battery had to be reshod & tires replaced on some wheels. The iron horse shoes & wheel tires were, in effect, sanded away by the crushed gravel road surface.

The Union farriers had a distinct advantage over their CSA peers: manufactured horse shoes. Making shoes from bar stock a master farrier was expected to shoe 4-6 horses in a 12 hour day. Farriery is a physically taxing business. That being said, with manufactured horse shoes it takes an hour to completely re-shoe a horse.


CSA farriers scavenged cast off shoes or took them from dead horses.

Note: My tech department is having a sleep over with her friends. However, for a very reasonable contribution you can get a PBS Passport. That not only gets you access to NOVA, there is an entire library of PBS shows. There were dozens of links for each show when I looked them up.
And more fun with numbers - from the AWI. I'd have to check my books but IIRC at least two of the carriages for the RA 3 lb gun were 10 spokes. The standard carriage for the RA light 6 lb gun was 12 spokes. For the US it should be kept in mind that it was a ways into the 19th century before the US began adopting a true system.
 
Well, even in those old days, balance would have been important. And I don't mean balanced as in an artistic view point but literally balance as in weight and center of mass. They didn't run at 60mph like our cars, which have balanced wheels. The other reason is stress. If you have gaps between some spokes then that rim will have to carry more load than the other parts of the wheel.

The strangest thing is how the spokes are not perpendicular to the wheel axle but they lean out. They form almost a cone. However, the spoke that is supporting the wheel is vertical to the ground.


From "Field Artillery Weapons of the Civil War":
"Wheels were made with a convexity or "dish" which gave them elasticity and protected them from shock. The "dish" also served to make the carriage wider with decreased length of the axletree"

I have also heard ( but don't have a documented source ) that the dish in the wheels would help in preventing mud from caking on the wheels.
 
If anyone can tell you about Civil War wheels of all kinds, I would think that it would be Duffy Neubauer at the Starkville Civil War Arsenal.
 
If anyone can tell you about Civil War wheels of all kinds, I would think that it would be Duffy Neubauer at the Starkville Civil War Arsenal.
Thank you, Red Bob, for your very gracious endorsement of me and The Starkville Civil War Arsenal. For those of you who are brave enough to sit through it, I have a thirty minute program on wheels if you visit the Arsenal. The program is entitled "The Anatomy, Maintenance and Repair of a Civil War Wheel".

4135634[2].jpg
 
I have also heard ( but don't have a documented source ) that the dish in the wheels would help in preventing mud from caking on the wheels.
As an engineer, I think it had something to do with reducing loads on the spokes or something.
I need to get my NASTRAN software out and build a 3-D stress model of the carriage. :nerd:
 
As an engineer, I think it had something to do with reducing loads on the spokes or something.
I need to get my NASTRAN software out and build a 3-D stress model of the carriage. :nerd:
In the 1980s, one of the curators at the Ft. Sill museum told me that the load was the reason for dished wheels. A single spoke could not bear the weight of a barrel and carriage, particularly while turning.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top