About Speeches Threatening War

Scribe

Cadet
Joined
May 9, 2008
Location
St. Louis, Mo
While still serving in the United States Senate, and while in treasonous communication with the nascent Confederacy, Sen. Louis T. Wigfall said this after the attack on the Star of the West.

"The Star of the West swaggered into Charleston harbor, received a blow planted full in the face, and staggered out. Your flag has been insulted; redress it, if you dare. You have submitted to it for two months, and you will submit to it for ever."
 
Wigfall was certainly a bold force unto himself, wasn't he...

Didn't he row out to Fort Sumter and address Maj. Anderson as the Man In Charge of This Here Bombardment?
 
Wigfall was a piece of work, all right. By about 1863, I bet Jefferson Davis would have gladly turned him over Abe Lincoln if he could have!
 
Wigfall was a piece of work, all right. By about 1863, I bet Jefferson Davis would have gladly turned him over Abe Lincoln if he could have!

Just because coincidences in history intrigue me, I thought I would mention the following.

During the 1840 South Carolina election for Governor, Wigfall (then 24) took an active and vocal part. During a five month period, he was involved in a fistfight, two duels, and 3 almost duels. In December, this led to Wigfall taking a ball through both thighs in a duel on an island in the Savannah River.

The man who shot him? Preston Brooks, future US Congressman, who would beat Senator Sumner insensible in the US Senate with his cane.

Why did Preston Brooks carry a cane? Because Louis Wigfall put a ball into his hip in the exchange of shots that day in 1840.

I wonder if history would have changed much if one or both of those men had placed their shots a little differently.

(Some say the duel had more to do with the two young men courting the same woman than any political dimension.)

Tim
 
What an interesting concept: Louis T. Wigfall as the Forrest Gump of the Civil War era.
 
I liked the one about a "piece of work."

I'm reasonably certain that someone actually liked that man. I just haven't found that person.

Ever run across someone that you just know you aren't going to like? Wigfall, from the first day I read his name, was one of those. If there was anything nasty that he didn't do, it hasn't been invented yet.
 
I liked the one about a "piece of work."

I'm reasonably certain that someone actually liked that man. I just haven't found that person.

Ever run across someone that you just know you aren't going to like? Wigfall, from the first day I read his name, was one of those. If there was anything nasty that he didn't do, it hasn't been invented yet.

On Christmas Day, 1860 Wigfall visited Secretary of War John B. Floyd (who had just been asked to resign by President Buchanan because of a major financial scandal). This is after South Carolina declared for secession, but before Anderson moved to Fort Sumter. Wigfall (Senator from Texas, but a native of South Carolina) wanted to discuss a scheme to kidnap Buchanan so that Vice President Breckinridge could become President.

Wigfall (who was referred to as the "third Senator from South Carolina" before the war) said the scheme was already planned and just needed backing from Floyd. He claimed this coup would prevent the South from being "trapped into a war" by the Presidential election. Bizarre.

Tim
 
I like to bring up a fact thet Wigfall was in Command of the fame "texas brigade" before Hood took command of it.

Wigfall was a drunk and resign his position to take a seat in the confedrate senate. lucky for Lee and Londstreet...
 
Good Lord. It's like a comedy.

The fact that anyone took them seriously turns it into a tragedy, or maybe just a very dark comedy.

But yes. HFM....how did they expect that to work?

I mean, people have done all sorts of dumb things in history. But this is somewhere beyond dumb into delusional.
 
One of Wigfall's last speeches in Congress...

As tending to show the peculiar mixture of brag, cajolery, and threats,
involved in the attitude of the South, as expressed by the same favorite
Southern mouthpiece, toward the Border-States on the one hand, and the
Middle and New England States on the other, a further extract from this
(February 7th) speech of the Texan Senator may be of interest. Said he:

"With exports to the amount of hundreds of millions of dollars, our
imports must be the same. With a lighter Tariff than any people ever
undertook to live under, we could have larger revenue. We would be able
to stand Direct Taxation to a greater extent than any people ever could
before, since the creation of the World.
We feel perfectly competent to
meet all issues that may be presented, either by hostility from abroad
or treason at home. So far as the Border-States are concerned, it is a
matter that concerns them alone. Should they confederate with us,
beyond all doubt New England machinery will be worked with the water
power of Tennessee, of Kentucky, of Virginia and of Maryland; the Tariff
laws that now give New England the monopoly in the thirty-three States,
will give to these Border States a monopoly in the Slave-holding States.
Should the non-Slave-holding States choose to side against us in
organizing their Governments, and cling to their New England brethren,
the only result will be, that the meat, the horses, the hemp, and the
grain, which we now buy in Pennsylvania, in Ohio, in Indiana and
Illinois, will be purchased in Kentucky and in Western Virginia and in
Missouri. Should Pennsylvania stand out, the only result will be, that
the iron which is now dug in Pennsylvania, will be dug in the mountains
of Tennessee and of Virginia and of Kentucky and of North Carolina.
These things we know.

"We feel no anxiety at all, so far as money or men are concerned. We
desire War with nobody; we intend to make no War; but we intend to live
under just such a Government as we see fit. Six States have left this
Union, and others are going to leave it simply because they choose to do
it; that is all. We do not ask your consent; we do not wish it
. We
have revoked our ratification of the Treaty commonly known as the
Constitution of the United States; a treaty for common defense and
general welfare; and we shall be perfectly willing to enter into another
Treaty with you, of peace and amity. Reject the olive branch and offer
us the sword, and we accept it; we have not the slightest objection.
Upon that subject we feel as the great William Lowndes felt upon another
important subject, the Presidency, which he said was neither to be
sought nor declined. When you invade our soil, look to your own
borders. You say that you have too many people, too many towns, too
dense a population, for us to invade you. I say to you Senators, that
there is nothing that ever stops the march of an invading force, except
a desert. The more populous a country, the more easy it is to subsist
an army."

After declaring that--"Not only are our non-Slaveholders loyal, but even
our Negroes are. We have no apprehensions whatever of insurrection--not
the slightest.
We can arm our negroes, and leave them at home, when we
are temporarily absent"--Mr. Wigfall proceeded to say: "We may as well
talk plainly about this matter. This is probably the last time I shall
have an opportunity of addressing you. There is another thing that an
invading army cannot do. It cannot burn up plantations. You can pull
down fences, but the Negroes will put them up the next morning. The
worst fuel that ever a man undertook to make fire with, is dirt; it will
not burn.
Now I have told you what an invading army cannot do. Suppose
I reverse the picture and tell you what it can do. An invading army in
an enemy's country, where there is a dense population, can subsist
itself at a very little cost; it does not always pay for what it gets.
An invading army can burn down towns; an invading army can burn down
manufactories; and it can starve operatives.
It can do all these
things. But an Invading army, and an army to defend a Country, both
require a military chest. You may bankrupt every man south of North
Carolina, so that his credit is reduced to such a point that he could
not discount a note for thirty dollars, at thirty days; but the next
autumn those Cotton States will have just as much money and as much
credit as they had before. They pick money off the cotton plant. Every
time that a Negro touches a cotton-pod with his hand, he pulls a piece
of silver out of it, and he drops it into the basket in which it is
carried to the gin-house. It is carried to the packing screw. A bale
of cotton rolls out-in other words, five ten-dollar pieces roll out
--covered with canvas. We shall never again make less than five million
bales of cotton. * * * We can produce five million bales of cotton,
every bale worth fifty dollars, which is the lowest market price it has
been for years past. We shall import a bale of something else, for
every bale of cotton that we export, and that bale will be worth fifty
dollars. We shall find no difficulty under a War-Tariff in raising an
abundance of money. We have been at Peace for a very long time, We are
very prosperous. Our planters use their cotton, not to buy the
necessaries of life, but for the superfluities, which they can do
without.
The States themselves have a mine of wealth in the loyalty and
the wealth of their citizens. Georgia, Mississippi, any one of those
States can issue its six per cent. bonds tomorrow, and receive cotton in
payment to the extent almost of the entire crop. They can first borrow
from their own citizens; they can tax them to an almost unlimited
extent; and they can raise revenue from a Tariff to an almost unlimited
extent.

"How will it be with New England? where will their revenue come from?
From your Custom-houses? what do you export? You have been telling us
here for the last quarter of a century, that you cannot manufacture,
even for the home market, under the Tariffs which we have given you.
When this Tariff ceases to operate in your favor, and you have to pay
for coming into our markets, what will you export? When your machinery
ceases to move, and your operatives are turned out, will you tax your
broken capitalist or your starving operative? When the navigation laws
cease to operate, what will become of your shipping interest? You are
going to blockade our ports, you say. That is a very innocent game; and
you suppose we shall sit quietly down and submit to a blockade. I speak
not of foreign interference, for we look not for it. We are just as
competent to take Queen Victoria and Louis Napoleon under our
protection, as they are to take us; and they are a great deal more
interested to-day in receiving cotton from our ports than we are in
shipping it. You may lock up every bale of cotton within the limits of
the eight Cotton States, and not allow us to export one for three years,
and we shall not feel it further than our military resources are
concerned. Exhaust the supply of cotton in Europe for one week, and all
Europe is in revolution.

"These are facts. You will blockade us! Do you suppose we shall do
nothing, even upon the sea? How many letters of marque and reprisal
would it take to put the whole of your ships up at your wharves to rot?
Will any merchant at Havre, or Liverpool, or any other portion of the
habitable globe, ship a cargo upon a New England, or New York, or
Philadelphia clipper, or other ship, when he knows that the seas are
swarming with letters of marque and reprisal? Why the mere apprehension
of such a thing will cut you out of the Carrying Trade of the civilized
World. * * * I speak not of the absurdity of the position that you can
blockade our ports, admitting at the same time that we are in the Union.
Blockade is a remedy, as all writers on International law say, against a
Foreign Power with whom you are at War. You cannot use a blockade
against your own people. An embargo even, you cannot use. That is a
remedy against a Foreign Nation with whom you expect to be at War. You
must treat us as in the Union, or out of it. We have gone out. We are
willing to live at peace with you; but, as sure as fate, whenever any
flag comes into one of our ports, that has thirty-three stars upon it,
that flag will be fired at. Displaying a flag with stars which we have
plucked from that bright galaxy, is an insult to the State within whose
waters that flag is displayed
. You cannot enforce the laws without
Coercion, and you cannot Coerce without War.

"These matters, then, can be settled. How? By withdrawing your troops;
admitting our right to Self-government clearly, unqualifiedly. Do this,
and there is no difficulty about it. You say that you will not do it.
Very well; we have no objection--none whatever. That is Coercion. When
you have attempted it, you will find that you have made War. These,
Senators, are facts. I come here to plead for Peace; but I have seen so
much and felt so much, that I am becoming at last, to tell the plain
truth of the matter, rather indifferent as to which way the thing turns.
If you want War, you can have it. If you want Peace, you can get it;
but I plead not for Peace

Wow, every time I read something from him the theme song from the Loonie Toons starts playing in my head....The couple of things that I found very interesting is that he is threatening the North with the very same type of warfare that Southerners hate Sherman for and describes putting tarriffs on their own citizens to fund the Confederacy, something else which the South supposedly hated the North for...
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top