Acbernsen
Private
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2016
I guess most would say that Lincoln would have lost the election without the "victories" in Atlanta and Mobile, but I'm wondering what people think about the world-historic consequences of there being no second term for Lincoln: no second inaugural (perhaps the greatest speech in the history of democracy), no assassination (however bad, the most galvanizing and immortalizing event of the century), and no likelihood that there was a peace that gave Davis what he was essentially looking for. Would this, as per the Gettysburg Address, have given fodder to the age-old argument that real democracy was a pipe dream? I only ask this as a history teacher that tries to put all of this in proper perspective. Davis, Lee et all, thought they were defending the principles of 1776. This is not a rhetorical question.
Last edited: