The Crater at Petersburg

To cash and Keyser Soze.
Whatever you term as "neutral", is in fact biased against the Confederacy. What I say as neutral, you quickly condemn it.
Chambersburg was burned a year later by John McCausland as a retaliation for what southern civilians were suffering in Federal hands.
Sherman burnt everything down. What he left behind him was the earth, scorched. Half-naked civilians, stripped of all they had before Sherman's "visit" were crouching in the now barren land.
Lee never ordered that, neither the CSA War Department. On their orders the 40 captives were released. They were captured by companies of guerillas, not regular troops of the Army of Northern Virginia.
The title 'Dead Confederates" shows not only bias, but hatred.
General Lee's men were digging listening tunnels, to see what was happening under them.
Civil War Scholar.
 
Whatever you term as "neutral", is in fact biased against the Confederacy. What I say as neutral, you quickly condemn it.

Because you don't understand what is neutral and what isn't.

Chambersburg was burned a year later by John McCausland as a retaliation for what southern civilians were suffering in Federal hands.

But you claimed Lee's men would never do such a thing. So once again you're contradicting your own claims.

Sherman burnt everything down.

Wrong as usual. Once again, you need to read actual histories of Sherman's campaign, not SCV websites.


What he left behind him was the earth, scorched. Half-naked civilians, stripped of all they had before Sherman's "visit" were crouching in the now barren land.

Then explain all the antebellum homes left in the wake of his march.

Lee never ordered that, neither the CSA War Department. On their orders the 40 captives were released.

Wrong again.

They were captured by companies of guerillas, not regular troops of the Army of Northern Virginia.

Wrong as usual. Every part of Lee's army participated in capturing African-Americans in Pennsylvania and taking them south into slavery.

The title 'Dead Confederates" shows not only bias, but hatred.

Wrong as usual.

General Lee's men were digging listening tunnels, to see what was happening under them.

Listening tunnels filled with explosives? You obviously need to read a lot more.
 
And the mine Lee ordered to be constructed was in retaliation to the atrocity the Federals had committed.

Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!

Again contradicting your earlier claim. If it's barbarous and criminal, then it's barbarous and criminal, no matter what. Apparently it's not so barbarous and criminal as you earlier contended.
 
To cash and Keyser Soze.
Whatever you term as "neutral", is in fact biased against the Confederacy. What I say as neutral, you quickly condemn it.
Chambersburg was burned a year later by John McCausland as a retaliation for what southern civilians were suffering in Federal hands.
Sherman burnt everything down. What he left behind him was the earth, scorched. Half-naked civilians, stripped of all they had before Sherman's "visit" were crouching in the now barren land.
Lee never ordered that, neither the CSA War Department. On their orders the 40 captives were released. They were captured by companies of guerillas, not regular troops of the Army of Northern Virginia.
The title 'Dead Confederates" shows not only bias, but hatred.
General Lee's men were digging listening tunnels, to see what was happening under them.
Civil War Scholar.

Now you've ticked me off. That blog is by our friend Andy Hall, who recently wrote "Blockade Running on the Confederate Coast" and doesn't have a biased bone in his funny body. He has been "Member of the Month" here, which is a good indication of the esteem hosts and moderators have for him. Now, I noticed you haven't responded to one of my posts, but I highly suggest you should do so immediately and do whatever type of apologizing you can think of, because you have mischaracterized a witty, wonderful and kind man. And this is the least I'll say about it.
 
<snipped for brevity>
Sherman burnt everything down. What he left behind him was the earth, scorched. Half-naked civilians, stripped of all they had before Sherman's "visit" were crouching in the now barren land.
Civil War Scholar.

A 1951 movie starring Michael Rennie and Patricia Neal, according to some pro-Confederate websites, was based on actual Civil War events :giggle::

Klaatu [Lincoln]: "I'm worried about Gort [Sherman]. There's no limit to what he could do. He could destroy the earth! In matters of aggression, we have given him absolute power over us. This power cannot be revoked. At the first signs of violence, he acts automatically against the aggressor. The penalty for provoking his action is too terrible to risk."

With an approving nod from Klaatu Lincoln, Gort Sherman unleashed his awesome power throughout EVERY square inch of the Confederacy! Employing his laser beam eyes he was able to burn down barns, homes, and entire towns at will leaving most of the South a smoldering cinder.

Finally as Gort Sherman reached the upper edges of the South, General Grant interposed with an order from Klaatu Lincoln: "Gort! Klaatu barada nikto!" There was nothing left to burn. Darth Sheridan had already incinerated every square inch of land to the north.
The Day The South Stood Still-The TRUTH, anonymous pro-Confederate website
 
To cash and Keyser Soze.
Whatever you term as "neutral", is in fact biased against the Confederacy. What I say as neutral, you quickly condemn it.

With due respect, sir, your documentation tends to be sketchy to non-existent.

Chambersburg was burned a year later by John McCausland as a retaliation for what southern civilians were suffering in Federal hands. Sherman burnt everything down. What he left behind him was the earth, scorched.

Gross exaggeration aside, since all that was done after Chambersburg then if was perfectly OK because it was done in retalliation for what Northern civilians suffered. Right?
 
Keyser Soze,
***deleted by jgoodguy violation of site rules*** In an assault, or in an artillery barrage there is response from the other side. When somebody attacks, the other side defends. When an artillery barrage takes place, the other side tries to eliminate the fire. When a mine is blown under the feet of sleeping men, there can be no resistance. It is unfair. Sherman said what he said in order to "justify" his war on Georgia civilians.
Civil War Scholar.

As moderator: Address what a poster posts not the poster or you will get points AKA demerits, your post will be edited or deleted or a combination. If it happens to you, report the post to the moderators.


Thank you

From Rules & Proper Etiquette of the American Civil War Forum | American Civil War Forums

DON'T FLAME OTHERS - Flaming is the practice of verbally attacking another member of the message board, and it is unacceptable and will get you banned from posting on our message boards. This may seem an obvious point at first, but many people use mild forms of flaming and don't even know it. Be mindful of the words you post. If the entire content of your post is to have a dig at someone you don't agree with, then don't make that post. Also, if one of your posts begins with: "No offense, but...", there is a good chance that your post IS offensive, and you may wish to reconsider making that post. Stay objective in debates, and don't get personal. If you have an issue with a post maker, please email a moderator.

BE CAREFUL WHEN QUOTING IN HEATED DEBATES - Although our message board is designed to quote other messages in your new message posts, sometimes quoting another person can cause problems. It is okay to quote a historical statement that another person made, or if you are politely trying to get clarification on a statement made in an earlier post. However, using a quote against another user in heated debates can be an offensive form of flaming, so be careful when using this feature.

AGREE TO DISAGREE WITH RESPECT - By all means have a healthy exchange of opinions. You can agree to disagree. You can challenge another member's opinions. But remember, you should challenge respectfully. Do not insult, abuse or verbally attack other members. We take a very serious view of offensive and vulgar messages -- especially those aimed at sexual orientation, gender, race, color, religious views, national origin, or disability.
 
So I guess artillery can only fire during normal working hours, armies have to inform the other side before they attack in order to ensure nobody is sleeping, and everyone has to take care to ensure that they only kill the other side in a respectful manner. ***deleted ***by jgoodguy reason: personal attack. War is cruelty, extreme cruelty. The goal in war is to beat your enemy, to destroy his armies and eliminate his will to fight. If the neo-reb complaint now is that the Yankees didn't fight fair then I guess all I can offer is another quote from the great man himself: "If the people raise a great howl against my barbarity and cruelty, I will answer that war is war, and not popularity seeking."

As moderator
Everyone be nice or else.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top