Have you seen instances of soldiers using a folded blanket as a flack jacket?

Rhea Cole

Lt. Colonel
Joined
Nov 2, 2019
Location
Murfreesboro, Tennessee
This is not by any measure your everyday Civil War question. In fact, the query requires quite an interesting preamble to make any sense at all.

In the linked article about Lt Col Joseph Bill's "Treatment on Arrow Wounds" ( original copies +/-) $600 ) is a reference to something I never heard of before.

During the Indian Wars infantrymen folded their blankets & wrapped it around to form a sort of flack jacket. It was, apparently, a useful defense against arrow wounds.


There is ample historical evidence to support the concept. Spanish conquistadors adopted the highly effective layered cotton body armor worn by Aztec & Inca warriors.

Link:


I know there was a lot of wacky body armor discarded during1860-61. Has anyone seen an instance of folded blankets being used as flack jackets during the Civil War… discounting troops on the Western frontier?
 
This is getting interesting. Hopefully some re-enactor will speak up in the name of science and give the approximate number of layers the issued Yankee wool blanket would make when rolled up for carry? Do you all think a WW1 or WW2 wool US army blanket would be close to a Yankee blanket for ballistics testing purposes?

The standard for material is weight. I don't have the QM regulations for blankets, but am sure it could be found.

There is also the question of velocity. A spent round will bounce off a coat. I have seen birdshot do just that. It stings like heck, but it did not even break the skin. There are a lot of variables, there isn't going to be one definitive answer to the he effectiveness of a wool army blanket as a flack jacket.

I knew nothing about this subject when I read the essay about Dr Bill's book. I am definitely not going out in the yard & shooting my blanket. The citations RedRover posted tell me what I need to know.
 
The answer is YES! The quality & thickness of this metal absorbed & deflected matchlock balls. The inner breast plate stopped the spall.

The answer is NO for the common soldier's armor.

In the PBS NOVA Science program 'Secrets of the Shining Knight' a replica of the best armor was created from scratch. Only a small number of these suits were ordered from an illustrated catalogue.

Link to firing tests:

Another point has to be made - the impact of the bullet. Given thet the Mminie was used during the war, it may not have penetrated, but it would be more than enough to break a limb or unhorse the wearer. Equally, during the Civil War, how many times were bow and arrow used East of the Mississippi?
 
The standard for material is weight. I don't have the QM regulations for blankets, but am sure it could be found.

There is also the question of velocity. A spent round will bounce off a coat. I have seen birdshot do just that. It stings like heck, but it did not even break the skin. There are a lot of variables, there isn't going to be one definitive answer to the he effectiveness of a wool army blanket as a flack jacket.

I knew nothing about this subject when I read the essay about Dr Bill's book. I am definitely not going out in the yard & shooting my blanket. The citations RedRover posted tell me what I need to know.
You have a valid point and it provides fertile ground for testing. There is a difference between stopping a direct shot at the wearer and stopping a stray shot fired from afar. At 100 yards it wouldn't take too much material to stop the buckshot from a .69 Buck and Ball load but the big .66 ball could still be lethal for hundreds of yards. The .66 ball's large frontal area makes it a poorer penetrator compared to a Minie increasing the chance of it being stopped at distance by a bedroll. Reducing loads to simulate velocity at varying distances is easy with loading charts. All I need to do is scrounge up a ragged old wool GI blanket, mine are too nice to shoot😱
 
Period photo of bedroll armored infantryman.
1730140800956.png

Photo courtesy of Michelin Tire 😂
 
You have a valid point and it provides fertile ground for testing. There is a difference between stopping a direct shot at the wearer and stopping a stray shot fired from afar. At 100 yards it wouldn't take too much material to stop the buckshot from a .69 Buck and Ball load but the big .66 ball could still be lethal for hundreds of yards. The .66 ball's large frontal area makes it a poorer penetrator compared to a Minie increasing the chance of it being stopped at distance by a bedroll. Reducing loads to simulate velocity at varying distances is easy with loading charts. All I need to do is scrounge up a ragged old wool GI blanket, mine are too nice to shoot😱

IMG_1826.jpeg


IMG_1827.jpeg


IMG_1828.jpeg


Joe Whitworth has a valid point. In 'The Rifled Musket' Fuller included test firings conducted by the Ordinance Department in 1860. 6' X 6' paper targets were fired on by serving soldiers.

In the examples above, 50 shots from .69 caliber smoothbore muskets were recorded.

At 100, 200 & 300 yards fewer & fewer of the balls carried that far. At 100 yds 38 hit the target. At 300 yards only 7 hits.

At 200 yards the small number of buck shot of buck & ball that traveled that far did not even pierce the paper.

At Stones River 60% of Bragg's infantry were armed with smoothbores. It is arguable to say that had the 14th Army Corps infantry wrapped themselves in folded blankets it would have given them a certain degree of protection… not to mention warmth on a bitterly cold day.
 
Looking at seven examples from Gettysburg, it does appear that a rolled blanket at least significantly mitigated the impact of a ball:

Lieutenant N. S. Walker, Company F, 48th Mississippi. Unhurt when a minie ball went through the blanket on his shoulder, making 18 holes.

Sergeant Edward K. Hess, Company F, 150th Pennsylvania. Uninjured by a bullet in the back which penetrated 35 thicknesses of gum blanket and his shelter tent.

Almus Stevens, 13th Vermont. A ball struck the blanket across his chest, put 19 holes in it, but he was unhurt.

Corporal William H. Mix, Company K, 2nd New Hampshire. Received a contusion on the left side of his thorax by a spent ball; he was protected by a book and a blanket.

Stephen R. Wilcox, Company F, 17th Connecticut. Wounded slightly on the skirmish line by a ball through his rubber blanket; it grazed his back in two places just below the shoulder, cut cartridge belt.

Lieutenant Coffin, 157th New York. Wounded slightly; the ball did not break the skin but passed through his blanket roll across his back, coat and belt and made a hole in his pants.

Sergeant Major? John Houston, 7th Michigan Cavalry. Escaped injury but a round perforated the blanket on his saddle.
 
Looking at seven examples from Gettysburg, it does appear that a rolled blanket at least significantly mitigated the impact of a ball:

Lieutenant N. S. Walker, Company F, 48th Mississippi. Unhurt when a minie ball went through the blanket on his shoulder, making 18 holes.

Sergeant Edward K. Hess, Company F, 150th Pennsylvania. Uninjured by a bullet in the back which penetrated 35 thicknesses of gum blanket and his shelter tent.

Almus Stevens, 13th Vermont. A ball struck the blanket across his chest, put 19 holes in it, but he was unhurt.

Corporal William H. Mix, Company K, 2nd New Hampshire. Received a contusion on the left side of his thorax by a spent ball; he was protected by a book and a blanket.

Stephen R. Wilcox, Company F, 17th Connecticut. Wounded slightly on the skirmish line by a ball through his rubber blanket; it grazed his back in two places just below the shoulder, cut cartridge belt.

Lieutenant Coffin, 157th New York. Wounded slightly; the ball did not break the skin but passed through his blanket roll across his back, coat and belt and made a hole in his pants.

Sergeant Major? John Houston, 7th Michigan Cavalry. Escaped injury but a round perforated the blanket on his saddle.

My goodness, hasn't this thread been productive?

Triggers the memory of re-enactor who laid his folded up blanket & hat on the ground. He fired on it point blank… the round passed through, skipped off a buried stone & decorated the door of his pickup. Delta Foxtrot… Sierra for Bravo & other unacceptable phrases come to mind, as well.
 
Last edited:
I've never seen or heard anything blanket flack jacket thing. But I do remember hearing somewhere, that some dragoons of one nation or another used rolled blankets to protect against saber blows.

My next question is to why the infantry did it but cavalry did not. I assume it has to do with how they carried their blankets. Curiouser & curiouser ¿no?
 
Got it!

Joseon warriors during the U S 1871 conflict in Korea wore cotton laminated armor. Up to 30 layers thick, it was capable of stopping the bullets of the combined army / navy force.

You have to scroll down past the introductory copy. Laminated armor is depicted in great detail. This is entirely new to me. Thanks goes out to HatEnjoyer who posted on a similar CWT thread.

Link:

 
I've never seen or heard anything blanket flack jacket thing. But I do remember hearing somewhere, that some dragoons of one nation or another used rolled blankets to protect against saber blows.

HatEnjoyer on another thread has found the answer to our questions. In 1871 US Marine / Navy expeditionary force in Korea encountered Joseon warriors wearing laminated cotton armor. Up to 30 layers of canvas were proof against contemporary U S bullets.

You will have to scroll past the introduction. The photos of the armor are very detailed.

Link:

 
This is not by any measure your everyday Civil War question. In fact, the query requires quite an interesting preamble to make any sense at all.

In the linked article about Lt Col Joseph Bill's "Treatment on Arrow Wounds" ( original copies +/-) $600 ) is a reference to something I never heard of before.

During the Indian Wars infantrymen folded their blankets & wrapped it around to form a sort of flack jacket. It was, apparently, a useful defense against arrow wounds.


There is ample historical evidence to support the concept. Spanish conquistadors adopted the highly effective layered cotton body armor worn by Aztec & Inca warriors.

Link:


I know there was a lot of wacky body armor discarded during1860-61. Has anyone seen an instance of folded blankets being used as flack jackets during the Civil War… discounting troops on the Western frontier?
"Conquistidore your stallion stands, in need of company..."
 
Looking at seven examples from Gettysburg, it does appear that a rolled blanket at least significantly mitigated the impact of a ball:

Lieutenant N. S. Walker, Company F, 48th Mississippi. Unhurt when a minie ball went through the blanket on his shoulder, making 18 holes.

Sergeant Edward K. Hess, Company F, 150th Pennsylvania. Uninjured by a bullet in the back which penetrated 35 thicknesses of gum blanket and his shelter tent.

Almus Stevens, 13th Vermont. A ball struck the blanket across his chest, put 19 holes in it, but he was unhurt.

Corporal William H. Mix, Company K, 2nd New Hampshire. Received a contusion on the left side of his thorax by a spent ball; he was protected by a book and a blanket.

Stephen R. Wilcox, Company F, 17th Connecticut. Wounded slightly on the skirmish line by a ball through his rubber blanket; it grazed his back in two places just below the shoulder, cut cartridge belt.

Lieutenant Coffin, 157th New York. Wounded slightly; the ball did not break the skin but passed through his blanket roll across his back, coat and belt and made a hole in his pants.

Sergeant Major? John Houston, 7th Michigan Cavalry. Escaped injury but a round perforated the blanket on his saddle.
Interesting, thanks for posting it Tom. It looks like the highest blanket count is 19 layers so now I've got a number to work with. The terms bullet, Minie ball and ball are all used. Bullets could refer to pistol or rifle projectiles , Minie balls could be .54, .58 or .69 projectiles and lastly the term "ball" could mean buckshot, pistol bullets, Minie balls .69 round balls, case shot or canister shot.
 
HatEnjoyer on another thread has found the answer to our questions. In 1871 US Marine / Navy expeditionary force in Korea encountered Joseon warriors wearing laminated cotton armor. Up to 30 layers of canvas were proof against contemporary U S bullets.

You will have to scroll past the introduction. The photos of the armor are very detailed.

Link:

Just got back from Seoul and took these photos last week at the War Memorial of Korea which is actually a fantastic museum of Korean military history.

7167C9C0-E573-4706-9724-B4546A424486.jpeg


A8D6F7C0-D4F0-4563-B41B-7343AE55E26C.jpeg
 
I've never seen or heard anything blanket flack jacket thing. But I do remember hearing somewhere, that some dragoons of one nation or another used rolled blankets to protect against saber blows.
Replying a bit late, but to my knowledge it was fairly common for Officers and Cavalrymen in most European armies in the coalition wars to use rolled greatcoats and blankets to defend against saber cuts. I've seen artistic depictions for both the French and the Austrians, at least
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top