Sons Of Confederate Veterans Lose in Lexington.

Ok, I am an advocate of Confederate Heritage, and I will define what I am celebrating: My ancestor's courage. I can not for life of me understand why we label 80% something percent of Southernors in with the rest of the slave holders? OK, no baiting or flaming just a question because I realized yesterday that some of our feelings are "raw" on the board and I don't want to start another battle. Anyways back on subject, Their courage in overwhelming odds and numbers, their love of family and state, the same reason I celebrate my patriot ancestry.
 
Ok, I am an advocate of Confederate Heritage, and I will define what I am celebrating: My ancestor's courage. I can not for life of me understand why we label 80% something percent of Southernors in with the rest of the slave holders? OK, no baiting or flaming just a question because I realized yesterday that some of our feelings are "raw" on the board and I don't want to start another battle. Anyways back on subject, Their courage in overwhelming odds and numbers, their love of family and state, the same reason I celebrate my patriot ancestry.

I like Mosby's quote.

"I am not ashamed of having fought on the side of slavery—a soldier fights for his country—right or wrong—he is not responsible for the political merits of the course he fights in ... The South was my country
 
This case is not necessarily over. The SCV could decide to appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals for this district. That court could either uphold the Federal District Judge's opinion or overrule his decision. If it upheld or overruled then the party who lost again could file appeal to U.S. Supreme Court.

Since sentiments are very high on this case, I would not be surprised that an Appeal would be filed.

In my experience, if one's client really believes in what they fighting for, Appeals are the only option. I was always glad in one particular case I was involved in on Age Discrimination that my client wanted to appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals in Cincinnati. That court overruled the District Court Judge. It was the right ruling and was my first time before that court.
 
Seems like a reasonable decision. The ordinance does not single out a particular private flag.

yesterday, however, I was in new castle, DE and they hang Dutch, Swedish, British, Delaware and American flags from their light poles to celebrate their history as these flags flew over the town at one time or another. I also see nothing wrong with this concept as one flag , excepting the US flag, has any precedence over others.

A "six flag" concept works well. It is the Battle flag flown to the exclusion of others that I might object.
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top