You are correct in that I am not from cotton pick'n country. I had a colleague who picked cotton and I asked him about the gin. He held up his hand and pinched his fingers together and pulled his hand back. He did it the old fashion way in the 1950s as a child.This comment made me laugh, you obviously aren't from a cotton growing part of the country. When cotton gets wet it gets rotten very quickly. Cotton left on the ground where the combines & trucks meet turns into compost. Cotton bales that were stacked up to form the core of a berm would become water logged. That actually made them denser. In time, the temporary works were a great mulch pile.
Cotton, in ordered to be useful has to be ginned to remove the seeds. Cotton that is even barely damp cannot be ginned.
Cotton is grown all around where I live in Middle Tennessee. For years I passed cotton fields taking & picking up children from school. In the 1970's the cotton fields near my aunt & uncle's place in Arkansas were still being picked by hand. So, I have reason to know about cotton farming.
You are correct in that I am not from cotton pick'n country. I had a colleague who picked cotton and I asked him about the gin. He held up his hand and pinched his fingers together and pulled his hand back. He did it the old fashion way in the 1950s as a child.
Winters "The Civil War in Louisiana" added clarification and says the bags were about 3 ft long. Seep page 267. Does that sound right for 30 lbs?
That price number was misleading. The price in British pence did not increase by that amount. The US currency vs the pound was very weak. Most people knew there was going to be rapid inflation in the US at some point.View attachment 561420
View attachment 561419
Even bales of hay can weigh 80 pounds. The U.S. standard cotton bale then & now weighed (+/-) 500 pounds.
View attachment 561421
This is one of those a picture is worth a thousand words images. The bales had to be very carefully loaded & unloaded to prevent a catastrophic capsize.
View attachment 561422
McPherson's floating cotton bale bridge from Harper's Weekly.
In his memoir Grant described the events leading up to construction of a floating cotton bale bridge.
Link:
Cotton was (+/-) $1.89 / pound in 1863. That was up from 10-13 cents / pound in 1860.
Neither 30 or 80 lbs of cotton do not constitute a bale of cotton.Here's why I asked. At Port Hudson some soldiers slung their muskets and carried 30 lb cotton bales. They were to throw them down the ditch so it would be easier to scale. I couldn't want to carry a 400 lb bale of cotton.
Those bales on the steamboat look awfully large; too large to carry. Even those 80 lb bales would be a task if you're going to carry it by hand. I can see rolling a bale like breastwork (Battle of Lexington).
Neither 30 or 80 lbs of cotton do not constitute a bale of cotton.
Unless they incorrectly used the word bale to mean a clump or armful of cotton.
Important for you to remember. A 400 to 500 lb bale of cotton has been highly compressed.
Machine called compresses are used to squeeze the cotton into a bale.
The building where these machines are housed are also called compresses.
Compresses are frequently located adjacent to cotton gins, where the leaves, seeds, sticks and other debris are removed.
30 lbs of noncompressed cotton would be a much larger volume than a man could manage and run across a field with a rifle.
Besides making him a huge white target.
There were no compresses to produce 30 lb bales. At most bundles of cotton might have been tied up with rope, similar to soldiers' blankets. These would have been manageable to carry, but would hardly have been firm enough to significantly help fill a ditch.
On the other hand a true bale of cotton is very firm, even when wet. They stopped most bullets fired directly into them. That's why there were used at Port Hudson and other places as sap rollers and other defensive works.
Bags of cotton would be, at best, like very soft pillows and would contribute next to nothing in filling a ditch, The ditch needed to be filled so men could climb over the earthworks. And again 30 lbs of unbaled, cotton would be a very large volume."Bale" was the term used by the Union soldiers and I concur that it is a misapplication of the term. Bags stuffed with cotton would be more accurate. That's hardly a bale. Rhea Cole mentions fascines and why they weren't resorted to by the assault troops to fill the ditches isn't explained in any of the material I've read. There is an abundance of wood sources at Port Hudson to draw from and it's certainly cheaper than cotton which was a commodity that could be sold. Fascines were used in making Union zig-zag approaches at Port Hudson and as late as WW II with the Churchill fascine carrier tanks.
One of these days I should go to the Audie Murphy Cotton Museum.
The cotton growers could not separate cotton from slavery. Their advantage was in superior varieties, and more efficiency in growing, packing and shipping cotton. They were unable to perceive that cotton could be grown under different land tenancy conditions, and the advantages of the US south would still remain. Their success happened too quickly, and they didn't think about protecting their advantage and modernizing their section.Bags of cotton would be, at best, like very soft pillows and would contribute next to nothing in filling a ditch, The ditch needed to be filled so men could climb over the earthworks. And again 30 lbs of unbaled, cotton would be a very large volume.
In decades past mechanical pickers would dump the cotton into trailers for transportation to the gin.
Kids would be encouraged, and sometimes paid a little money to climb in the trailers and stomp down the raw cotton. It was great fun. We could also jump from the sides of the trailer It was called "trailer trompin' " Any one who ever did it can tell you that the biggest arm load of cotton you could grab and hold didn't weigh 5 pounds.
Worst cases of tunnel vision in our country's history.The cotton growers could not separate cotton from slavery. Their advantage was in superior varieties, and more efficiency in growing, packing and shipping cotton. They were unable to perceive that cotton could be grown under different land tenancy conditions, and the advantages of the US south would still remain. Their success happened too quickly, and they didn't think about protecting their advantage and modernizing their section.
Wasn't there a story of some general , Beauregard I think,spending the night in a cotton press? He was arrested and falsely accused at the close of the war for possibly hiding the wanted fugituve, Gen. Kirby Smith. No jail was readily handy in New Orleans so they used cotton press. I'm not sure if this incident ever really happened or it was just a story but I did read it somewhere.
Does anyone have an image of a Civil War period cotton bale? I know they were used to "armor" ships, make breastworks and even sap rollers. I read that they were 30 lbs and were man portable.
My aunt painted still art and flower vases and sold them. Her best selling subject was a old house in a cotton field.Another of Mom's cotton pictures
30 lbs?? More like 500 lbs. i had a summer job in college where I was an assistant forklift operator(I held the clipboard) move bales of cotton seed lint. This plant processes cotton seeds extracted by gins to obtain oil, meal & lint— the thin bit of cotton still clinging to the seed.
After the battle at Fort Pemberton, Greenwood, MS, the Federal engineers returned to see how the earthworks were made such they deflected the cannon balls.
They discovered they were made by stacking 3 cotton bales along the line, 2 on bottom and 1 on top. Then they covered them with dirt and leather skins and more dirt.
May not be quite what you're looking for but relatively close...Antebellum bringing cotton to house.Anybody got an image of a cotton bag that would be used to collect cotton?