To summarise:
| | | | |
| | | | |
| 1st Bonham | | | | |
| 2nd Ewell | | | | |
| 3rd D.R. Jones | | | | |
| 4th Longstreet | | | | |
| 5th Cocke | | | | |
| 6th Early | | | 7th La removed (below)
4th S.C. added
24th Va. omitted | |
| 7th Louisiana | | | | |
| 8th Louisiana (6 coys) | | | | |
| Hampton Legion (6 coys) | | | | |
| 30th Virginia Cavalry | | | | |
| Cavalry 10 troops | | | See below | |
| Washington Artillery | | | Squire's only | |
| Kemper's | | | | |
| Latham's | | | | |
| Loudon's | | | | |
| | | | |
Harrison's Battalion is not listed in Report No.118 so presumably they are included in the 10 troops?
Who are included in the ten troops of cavalry is unknown. It may therefore be the following:
Scott's Squadron Cavalry: Maj. John Scott
Unlettered Company Prince William Cavalry: Capt. W.W. Thornton
Munford's Cavalry Squadron: Lt-Col. T.T. Munford
Chesterfield Light Dragoons, Company B: Capt. W B Ball
Fauquier Black Horse Troop: Capt. William H. Payne
Loudon Cavalry
Loudoun Cavalry: Captain W. W. Mead
Madison Cavalry: Capt. W. Thomas
Wickham's Cavalry Squadron
Hanover Light Dragoons, Captain W C Wickham; served with 1st Brigade.
Washington's Home Guards/ Fairfax Cavalry: Capt. E B Powell
Harrison's Battalion: Maj. J. Harrison
Goochland Light Dragoons, First Lieutenant G F Harrison
Governor's Mounted Guards, Captain J G Cabell
Chesterfield Light Dragoons, Company B, Captain W B Ball
Cavalry is not my speciality especially at the start of the war when companies were formed, merged and ended up with several names! I will admit to one mistake when I listed Evan's Demi-brigade I included 'Terry's Texas Rangers' but at the time Terry was serving in the Clay Dragoons of 30th Virginia Cavalry (which was not called that at the time!). He went on to form his Texas Rangers afterwards. In my defence I did list both companies of the 30th Virginia Cavalry that were assigned to Evans yet 190 seems high for 2 companies of cavalry that average was only around 65. As I have said cavalry is not my forte!
There is a good element of agreement between the figures I have given and those in the Official Report. The difference is largely due to my inclusion of D.R. Jones' brigade. Why this brigade was not included in the O.R. table is unknown as they reported 75 casualties!
These numbers suggest that the idea that regiments contained 1,000 or more men is quite frankly incorrect. Our use of the Official Records clearly demonstrate this, especially when you consider the individual regiments from each brigade and what is known about them. Several regiments did not have all of their companies engaged which reduced the overall total.
With many regiments numbering between 600 and 800 there would still be difficulty in commanding regiments of that size, particularly for individuals who were not accustomed in controlling this number of men. This helps to explain the command issues that both sides experienced.
As some have already noted, why was there such a drop in numbers when most enlistment registers number above 800 men?
What is known is that placing large numbers of people together helped the spread of disease and infection and we know many were incapacitated by the spread of what would be considered 'childhood diseases' as they would not exposed to these infections as many individuals came from a largely rural background. We also know that some individuals absconded after receiving their 'bounty', only to re-enlist again elsewhere. There were obviously also some that had second thoughts after enlisting. However considering that the war was to claim more casualties as a result of disease (in an era before infection control) than any other circumstances I think it is safe to assume that disease was the major reason for the significant drop in numbers of many regiments.