Grant Grant In The Dragoons?

Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Location
Jupiter, FL
Upon graduating West Point, Grant requested assignment in the Dragoons, which made sense given his love of horses. However, due to a lack of vacancies he was assigned to the Infantry instead.

Where might Grant have served it he had gotten his wish to join the Dragoons? How would his antebellum Army career gone differently?
[Edited for clarity]

IIRC the US Army only had two regiments of Dragoons which should limit the possibilities.
 
Last edited:
Upon graduating West Point, Grant requested assignment in the Dragoons, which made sense given his love of horses. However, due to a lack of vacancies he was assigned to the Infantry instead.
Maybe we could just take a look at Grant's record and ability with horses at West Point:

[Ingalls] recalled that Grant "was the most daring horseman in the Academy." and no one disagreed.

"One cadet recalled, "It was as good as any circus to see Grant ride."

"After he broke a particularly rebellious dark bay, his classmates "would stand around admiring his wonderful command of the beast and his graceful evolutions."

"In June 1843 Grant brought the whole audience to its feet during the final exercise at the academy riding hall. After a cadet exhibition of various riding skills, the riding master, a grizzled sargent, raising the jumping bar above his head, announced, "Cadet Grant!" People looked to the end of the hall, where a smallish, sligh cadet was mounted on York, a huge sorrel. His fellow cadets had warned Sam Grant that York would kill him (to which he had replied, "Well, I can't die but once"). Now York galloped toward the bar. Grant felt the sorrel gathering for the jump; then the two made the leap with such grace that it seemed to one observer "as if man and beast had been welded together as they cleared the bar. But it was second nature for the cadet who had just established the academy's high-jump record. It would stand for over twenty-five years ..."

Then there comes his assignment to the Fourth Infantry:

"Given his class rank, Grant had little choice when it came to selecting a branch in the service. He requested to be signed to the Dragoons - a logical choice for a horseman - followed by Infantry.

In midsummer he found out that he would join the Fourth Infantry - apparently the Dragoons had no vacancies."

Triumph Over Adversity - Brooks D. Simpson.

So, it appears Grant may have had a choice if he had placed higher in his class ranking.

From Ulysses memoirs:

"At last all the examinations were passed, and the members of the class were called upon to record their choice of arms for service and regiments. I was anxious to enter the cavalry, or dragoons as they were then called, but there was only one regiment of Dragoons in the army at that time, and attached to that, besides the full complement of officers, there were at least four brevet second lieutenants. I recorded therefore my first choice, dragoons; second, 4th infantry; and got the latter."

The Complete Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant

Where might Grant have served it he had gotten his wish to join the Dragoons? How would his antebellum Army career gone differently?
You pose an interesting question, and I've often wondered the same thing. If Grant had gotten his wish, where would he have ended up? Where were the cavalry at the start of the war? Would he have been a 'daring' cavalryman? Could that have led to his earlier demise?

I imagine Grant would have been a superb cavalryman. I've no doubt he would have been daring, as several incidents with horses shows. I also think he would have excelled in this area, though the risk to his life may have been greater, and I'm sure if you consider his love of horses, he'd have thoroughly enjoyed life as a cavalryman.
 
Last edited:
Indeed, your options depended upon your placement. Grant was ranked too low to be eligible for the cavalry. Indeed there was only one dragoon regiment the year Grant graduated, as in March '43 the 2nd Dragoons had been redesignated the US Regiment of Rifles. This was reversed a bit later. In 1843 both Dragoon regiments had 3 supernumenaries, and the supernumenaries of the 2nd Dragoons were transferred to the 1st with the redesignation as "Rifles", making the 1st Dragoons four officers overstrength (as two officers had left allowing everyone to move up two places). In 1843 the Dragoons accepted no new graduates, being the most over-officered regiment in the army.

The army register of 1844 shows the following for the class of 43:

Corps of Engineers: none accepted (1 supernumenary - GW Smith)
Topographical Engineers: accepted the top two in the class; WB Franklin (1st) and WF Raynolds (2nd) (totaling 4 supernumenaries)
Ordnance: accepted the next two as supernumeraries; Geo. Deshon and TJ Brereton (totaling 7 supernumenaries)
Dragoons: none accepted (4 supernumenaries - RH Anderson and three who are uninteresting)
1st Arty: two (both supernumenary)
2nd Arty: three (to total 5 supernumenaries with 2 from the class of '42)
3rd Arty: two (to total 6 ditto)
4th Arty: two (to total 4 ditto)
1st Inf: three (4)
2nd Inf: four (5)
3rd Inf: three (4)
4th Inf: three (5 - Grant ranked 2nd of the three new officers)
5th Inf: one (4)
6th Inf: two (3)
7th Inf: three (5)
8th Inf: three (5)
1st Rifles: four (of whom two had substantive commissions)

Total = 39 new officers (at 72 supernumenaries)

By Corps the class was assigned:
Engrs: 0
Topo Engrs: 2
Ord: 2
Cav/Drag: 0
Arty: 9
Rifles: 4
Inf: 21

This shows that the USMA was seriously overproducing officers for the size of the Army at the time. In 1844 there were 72 junior officers surplus to establishment.

Grant's chances of getting assigned to the cavalry were nil. The cavalry were already too oversubscribed and could accept no-one that year.
 
Topographical Engineers: accepted the top two in the class; WB Franklin (1st) and WF Raynolds (2nd)

As an aside, both men would go on to do important work for the Lighthouse Board.

Grant's chances of getting assigned to the cavalry were nil. The cavalry were already too oversubscribed and could accept no-one that year.

Good point, and well-explained.

It really underscores the weaknesses of the antebellum Army when a cadet who wants to be in the cavalry and everyone knew to be an extremely skilled horseman doesn't get in.

Still, it's an interesting counterfactual because of Grant's horsemanship, even if a hugely improbable one. (There's always fluke accidents.)
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top