Lee Robert E. Lee's decisions in the 1850s.

wausaubob

Brev. Brig. Gen'l
Member of the Month
Joined
Apr 4, 2017
Location
Denver, CO
He had enough seniority to avoid getting posted to California. That meant he never was exposed to the international community that invaded the gold fields, nor did he meet with Henry Halleck when Halleck successfully maneuvered slavery out of the constitution of California. Lee did not go with Delafield to Europe to observe the conclusion of the Crimean war. Mordecai took that slot and McClellan got the slot open for a northern officer. Lee was not exposed to English and French thinking about the modern world. Colonel Lee did his duty at West Point. But the "snake pit" he disliked may well have been the politics of being with northern officers as well as the rapid development of the intellectual climate of West Point and Troy, NY. Contrast Robert E. Lee, who took a combat assignment to Texas as soon as it was offered, to George Thomas, who married a woman from Troy, and later threw his lot in with Winfield Scott and the United States. Later in the decade Lee took leave from the army to try and settle the Custis estate. That task must have been frustrating for him, with the rising tide of abolition not far away in Pennsylvania.
These acts seem to tend towards self isolation from modern thought. He was turning back to plantation life and slavery, the environment he grew up in, and the attempt to regain the prestige his father may have squandered.
The decision to not go to Europe may have cost him the most. When he didn't know about how much progress had occurred in naval gunnery he may have been surprised to learn that no brick and mortar fort was viable.
Once he had immersed himself in Texas and in the Custis estates, there was little opportunity to observe how fast the US was growing and how influential English thought had become. He married into the Custis lineage, but the examples of George Washington and Winfield Scott were not convincing to him. There is an aspect of tragedy involved.
 
This is an interesting topic and one I am not qualified to comment on, other than to say that Lee's prosecution of the war seemed to be increasingly archaic in some ways. Anyways, here's hoping some folks who are more knowledgeable will share their insights….
 
This is an interesting topic and one I am not qualified to comment on, other than to say that Lee's prosecution of the war seemed to be increasingly archaic in some ways. Anyways, here's hoping some folks who are more knowledgeable will share their insights….
Me too. I don't consider myself a Lee expert by any means.
 
Last edited:

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top