CSMC and Naval Infantry

Why don't people research the CSMC (besides the lack of records). It's a topic that I find very interesting.
Many are indeed researching.

I find the CSMC a fascinating subject as well.

The quick answer (from what I recall) is the majority of official records were lost in a fire.

Seems one man saved many records ... days before the fall of Richmond.
A few years later, his house caught fire and much what he had saved was lost along with
his home.

As a member of the Company of Military Historians, over the years I've noticed many new records have been published
in the organization's journal. Although these preserved documents focus on individuals, they are helping to provided a better "picture" of the CSMC.
 
Last edited:
There is a book," Rebel Leathernecks" by Ralph Donnelly that is about the CSMC. I used to have a copy but it unfortunately is now MIA. It's a little dry but had some good information mainly about the command structure and the types of duties performed by the CSMC, mainly Ship Board detachments and yard guards IIRC. They did engage in a few land/landing operations bur the CSMC was smaller than the USMC if you can believe that, and like CSN was pretty heavy with foreign members in the enlisted ranks.
 
There is a book," Rebel Leathernecks" by Ralph Donnelly that is about the CSMC. I used to have a copy but it unfortunately is now MIA. It's a little dry but had some good information mainly about the command structure and the types of duties performed by the CSMC, mainly Ship Board detachments and yard guards IIRC. They did engage in a few land/landing operations bur the CSMC was smaller than the USMC if you can believe that, and like CSN was pretty heavy with foreign members in the enlisted ranks.
I have that book too. I think the CSMC isn't studied because of its minor role in the war and its size. They never had more they 600 men at a time, around the size of a confederate infantry regiment.
 
 
IMG_0899.jpeg


IMG_0900.jpeg
 
I have that book too. I think the CSMC isn't studied because of its minor role in the war and its size. They never had more they 600 men at a time, around the size of a confederate infantry regiment.
I got the book from a girl named Beal who was related to Colonel Beal, not directly related but related. Yes they were a realitvely tiny formation and apparently had snappy uniforms.
 
I have the .pdf of that. Very good. Another thing you can track down is the register of Naval & CSMC Officers.

To spite small numbers they were effective wherever they were. In ships, manning guns at Ft. Fisher, ETC. Bugs me when I gear they were ineffective. Propaganda, propaganda!
 

Learn About Us
About CivilWarTalk
Contact the Webmaster
Meet the Staff
Link to CivilWarTalk
Join Our Community
Register
Browse Forums
View Today's Discussions
Search the Forum
Get Help
FAQ
Student Guide
Forum Rules & Etiquette
Copyright / DMCA

     Contact Us CivilwarTalk on Facebook CivilWarTalk on YouTube CivilWarTalk on Twitter RSS Feed

Bringing the American Civil War and More to Life.
© 1999 - , CIVILWARTALK, LLC - Site Version 10.0

SlaveryTalk.com - SecessionTalk.com - CivilWarTalk.com - ReconstructionTalk.com
Back
Top