1. Welcome to the CivilWarTalk, a forum for questions and discussions about the American Civil War! Become a member today for full access to all of our resources, it's fast, simple, and absolutely free!
Dismiss Notice
Join and Become a Patron at CivilWarTalk!
Support this site with a monthly or yearly subscription! Active Patrons get to browse the site Ad free!
START BY JOINING NOW!

What makes Nathan Bedford Forrest Honorable?

Discussion in 'Nathan B. Forrest' started by shermans_march, Aug 9, 2018.

  1. shermans_march

    shermans_march First Sergeant

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1,441
    Location:
    Colorado, Under A Pile of Snow
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2018

  2. (Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)
  3. Andy P.

    Andy P. Cadet

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2017
    Messages:
    23
    Nothing.
     
    Cody C. Engdahl likes this.
  4. dixie1861

    dixie1861 Corporal

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2018
    Messages:
    476
    @diane, this thread is for you! :smile: I'm so excited to see the responses from the experts. I'm no expert, but Forrest will always be (relatively) honorable in my eyes. He did get a wee bit out of hand a few times. :wink:
     
  5. WilliamH

    WilliamH Corporal

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    279
    Location:
    Point Lookout
    off the top of my head... I would say his defense of a women being abused by her husband was honorable.

    His speech to his men at the end of the war was an honorable act. So was his speech to the Pole-Bearers Association.

    His duty as he saw it to his home (TN) and his men was honorable.

    His courage to fight for his beliefs both in combat and in pushing back against his superiors (Gen Bragg).

    He wasn't a man to give into drink (get drunk), that is honorable in my opinion.

    I think he was certainly a man with a code and honor... doesn't mean he was perfect or nice.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2018
  6. WilliamH

    WilliamH Corporal

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    279
    Location:
    Point Lookout
    I also look forward to @Diana post, sometimes I get the sense that she actually knew the General.
     
  7. dixie1861

    dixie1861 Corporal

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2018
    Messages:
    476
    Hahaha, I agree. I don't know how she knows it all, but it's amazing!!!!! :smile: She's the bomb.
     
  8. diane

    diane Brev. Brig. Gen'l

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    21,439
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Well, the OP appears to be offering an opportunity to defend an opinion that Forrest was an honorable man. All that can be said, given those perimeters, is in my opinion I believe he was.
     
  9. shermans_march

    shermans_march First Sergeant

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1,441
    Location:
    Colorado, Under A Pile of Snow
    The title says "what makes him honorable?" I would prefer reasons rather than a yes or no answer.
     
    gem likes this.
  10. WilliamH

    WilliamH Corporal

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    279
    Location:
    Point Lookout
    I’ll add that his acknowledgment that he was flawed individual and his actions to improve himself, (in his case through accepting Jesus Christ as his lord and savior) makes him honorable. The softer, kinder more accepting Gen Forrest that addresses the Pole-Bearers and kisses the Black women in Public is often associated/presented as proof of his personal religious awaken. (he became “woke” as my generation would say :wink:, at least for 1870 standards)

    Note I’m not claiming his religious views were right or wrong (that’s against the rules:redcarded:), simply stating that his religious awaken seems to have led him to be a better man. That acknowledgment of faults and will to improve (be through religion or other ways) is very honorable.
     
  11. diane

    diane Brev. Brig. Gen'l

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    21,439
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Ok - that's clarification. Seems WilliamH up above gave you a few reasons on the pro-honorable side. You apparently accept that small list as valid or you would have given reasons why not.

    p s
    Sorry! I'm talking to sherman's-march!
     
  12. diane

    diane Brev. Brig. Gen'l

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    21,439
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Generally, when someone is arguing another's honor, there's a problem with presentism. For example, at one time it was considered perfectly honorable to whop the tar out of a fairly helpless senator in defense of family name - Brooks and Sumner. To me, it's perfectly cowardly to corner a guy behind his desk and give him brain damage while he has little chance to defend himself - yet, Brooks was hailed as an honorable man. An insult had been given the South and the Brooks' family name and he had given the guilty party the beating he deserved. Honorable? I don't think so but many of that time did - he got a load of canes in case he needed them for just such another occasion! In Forrest's day, there was little fluid about the matter of honor - it was a societal code, and it didn't always include what we might think it did or should have.
     
    Lazy Bayou, TomP, dlavin and 8 others like this.
  13. Cavalry Charger

    Cavalry Charger 1st Lieutenant Silver Patron

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2017
    Messages:
    4,026
    The first difficulty I see with the OP is with the definition of 'honorable'. It needs to be defined.

    The second difficulty is the parameters that are to be set. Was he honorable as a man, a soldier, a son, brother, husband or father?

    What I know about Forrest I have learnt here. Both Grant and Sherman spoke highly of him as a soldier. Not necesssarily all his actions. The calamity of war engenders many dishonorable actions which can be the cause of later regret.
    He also was the only man who rose from the lowest to the highest rank of the army on either side. These are things to acknowledge IMO.

    Like most men, I don't think Forrest lived up to any one's expectations except his own with regard to the concept at hand.
     
  14. shermans_march

    shermans_march First Sergeant

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1,441
    Location:
    Colorado, Under A Pile of Snow
    Thanks. I don't disagree with some good things that are attributed. It is my opinion that the good has to be weighed with the bad and only after that can we acknowledge if someone is honorable. The information I know on Forrest has been mainly the negative. To be honest I don't believe Forrest as a person was honorable. I can acknowledge that he was loyal and brave though. Does that make him honorable? I don't know.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2018
    Cavalry Charger likes this.
  15. shermans_march

    shermans_march First Sergeant

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1,441
    Location:
    Colorado, Under A Pile of Snow
    Good question. Individuals from the thread linked to this one said that Forrest was honorable. There was no definition of what honorable meant or to what parameters it applies. The reason for this thread is to get clarification.
     
    Cavalry Charger likes this.
  16. diane

    diane Brev. Brig. Gen'l

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2010
    Messages:
    21,439
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Honorable, in Forrest's case, would clearly have to be defined by what was considered honorable in his time. For example, if someone called you a pup, you were perfectly justified in getting a gun and shooting the guy in the back - which is basically what Jefferson C Davis did with Bull Nelson. Nelson was murdered but Davis had a 'matter of honor'.

    With Forrest, the fight in the plaza of Hernando was a duel not a brawl, and the perimeters were set out before the affair even began. Three men appeared to challenge his elderly uncle over the custody of some children belonging to both families. The men timed it to coincide with Forrest's absence but he was told of it and appeared - he was told it was not his concern. However, honor said it was his concern. He was the target's nephew, family, and one defended family. It was also a simpler matter - 3 young men against 1 old man needed some evening up! The offended party picked their weapons - shotguns, sticks and bowie knives - and they fired the first shot. Now, honor was served when the killer of the uncle was shot dead by Forrest, but justice was not - so the fight continued until it was resolved by all four being wounded, two dying.

    The Forrest/Gould affair was another matter of honor. Gould was insulted by his demotion for losing his guns at the battle of Days Gap - he considered it a slur against his courage and therefore a matter of honor. He got Forrest into a hallway to talk to him and then used the opportunity to try to draw a pistol from the pocket of his duster - knowing Forrest did not have a pistol or any other obvious weapon with which to defend himself. Gould did it properly, issuing a challenge so that Forrest would know this attempted murder was a duel, by saying, "One of us will not leave here alive!" As it happened, Forrest was shot but gave as good as he got with a penknife he opened with his teeth. These two duels are examples of a certain societal code of honor we might not find so honorable today.

    Brian Steel Wills examines Forrest's life from the viewpoint of the Southern code of honor - A Battle From the Start. It's a very interesting book and may help explain some things about Forrest that do not seem to fill the bill for honor.
     
  17. bdtex

    bdtex Brigadier General Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2015
    Messages:
    6,884
    Location:
    Houston,TX area
  18. uaskme

    uaskme First Sergeant

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2016
    Messages:
    1,367
    He killed Yankees. We can forgive him for some of his short comings.

    **Off-topic content edited**
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 10, 2018
  19. ucvrelics.com

    ucvrelics.com 1st Lieutenant Forum Host

    Joined:
    May 7, 2016
    Messages:
    4,705
    Location:
    Alabama
    I believe this say a lot about how honorable Gen Forrest was especially coming from a yankee.
    fed tribute to Forrest.jpg
     
  20. shermans_march

    shermans_march First Sergeant

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1,441
    Location:
    Colorado, Under A Pile of Snow
    Thanks for the resource. That gives great perspective from one who knew and respected the man.
     
  21. Belle Montgomery

    Belle Montgomery First Sergeant

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2017
    Messages:
    1,292
    Location:
    44022
    All Generals had their flaws and honor to them is subjective...**off-topic content edited.**
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 10, 2018

(Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)

Share This Page


(Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)