- May 24, 2016
He's politically correct, though because he was one of the tiny minority to write against our participation in the Mexican War for any other reason than terms of the expansion of slavery.Not surprising that West Point has had issues with the legacy of Grant. Most of the enemy soldiers he killed were Americans.
I will be excited to see images of the dedication and thanks for the reminder @Phil Gast . The dedication is timely as it coincides with Grant's birthday this weekend as well. Like the colorized image you have posted here, too. Thanks.View attachment 304290West Point dedicates statue of Ulysses S. Grant as his presidential stature increases. https://civil-war-picket.blogspot.com/2019/04/new-west-point-statue-of-ulysses-s.html
I don’t find the quote inaccurate. Grant was a friend of the freedmen, as much as he politically could be. Also, as I understand it, much of the character attacks on Grant find their roots in the early Lost Cause writings at the same time many of the Confederate monuments were being erected for the reasons White cites.I am disappointed to see this bit of 'political speak' in relation to the dedication of this monument:
'White, author of “American Ulysses: A Life of Ulysses S. Grant,” writes in a Washington Post op-ed piece this week that the new statue is going up for the right reasons as other monuments of Confederate figures are being removed.'
Although White may have a point in continuing his train of thought:
“A chief insight in the reappraisal of Grant is the recognition that, at the beginning of the post-Civil War period of oppression, he acted courageously to protect the rights of freed men and women,” White writes. “Grant’s fall from American grace largely coincided with the rise of white supremacy in the early 20th century. During that period, leaders who stood up for the rights of African-Americans were not often lionized.”
he is forgetting that many of the monuments being removed are also those of Graduates of West Point admired as military/fighting men.
I didn't say the quote was 'inaccurate'. I said I was disappointed at the political nature of the comment. And I stated the reason as being many of the Confederate monuments mentioned, and which are now being removed, were also of former West Point graduates renowned for their military capabilities. The focus is on West Point as much as it is on Grant if we take into account where the statue is being unveiled.I don’t find the quote inaccurate. Grant was a friend of the freedmen, as much as he politically could be. Also, as I understand it, much of the character attacks on Grant find their roots in the early Lost Cause writings at the same time many of the Confederate monuments were being erected for the reasons White cites.
Here's some of the unveiling today...
So delighted to see this! Thank you for sharing. Hopefully for those not on Facebook there will be some other options for them to view the dedication, but great to see this momentous occasion being shared already on at least one social media platform.Here's some of the unveiling today...
I wonder if they're trying to cover them all by using the term General-in-Chief, at least for the military aspect of his career.Perhaps I'm mistaken but they apparently chose to simplify his highest military rank on the monument by stating "General-in-Chief Army of the United States 1864-1869". Most will note Grant was promoted to 3-star Lieutenant General in 1864 and 4-star General of the Army in 1866. He then of course became President, therefore, Commander-in-Chief.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|MFR History of The West Point Foundry||Artillery Profile||6|
|M||Discussion West Point||Civil War History Discussion||6|
|M||Discussion West Point versus European military academies.||Civil War History Discussion||1|
|M||Discussion West Point During The War||Civil War History Discussion||12|