it would be unconstitutional to allow a President to pass laws, states are prohibited from over ruling an amendment by the supremacy clause so cant force other states to comply with their laws but of course a state can make slavery illegal in their state..which is the entire point of the C. A....leave it up to the states and courts apply existing law or interpret them and can not subvert an amendment....in fact when case law is challenged it can be overturned by an amendment not the reverse. the above "powers" are powerless to interfere.
Never said anything about the President passing laws.
Never said anything about a State over ruling an Amendment.
You didnt respond to this "All the complaints in South Carolina's declaration were about activities that hadnt needed an Amendment grating new power to Congress.."
South Carolina delcared that "For twenty-five years this agitation has been steadily increasing, until it has now secured to its aid the power of the common Government. Observing the
forms of the
Constitution, a sectional party has found within that
Article establishing the Executive Department, the means of subverting the Constitution itself. A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration of the common Government, because he has declared that that "Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free," and that the public mind must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction.
This sectional combination for the submersion of the
Constitution, has been aided in some of the States by elevating to citizenship, persons who, by the supreme law of the land, are incapable of becoming citizens; and their votes have been used to inaugurate a new policy, hostile to the South, and destructive of its beliefs and safety.
On the 4th day of March next, this party will take possession of the Government. It has announced that the South shall be excluded from the common territory, that the judicial tribunals shall be made sectional, and that a war must be waged against slavery until it shall cease throughout the United States."
All that WITHOUT an Amendment granting new power to Congress - so none of the above would be constrained by the Corwin Amendment, which only limited future Amendments granting new power to Congress. So why would this silly Amendment make them take it all back?