You didn't assert use of Federal military forces in that case. So now you are shifting the goal posts.
You're mistaken as to what the historical record shows.
I was obviously referring to response to attack upon a U.S. facility and servicemen, which is how we got on the subject, so I am not sure what your confusion on this is. If armed insurrection prohibited the functions of the U.S. government, they could be sustained via the force of the United States military.
No, I am not mistaken regarding the historical record. It is pretty clear on these central questions.
I have made my basic points on this. I will just leave it at that unless something else comes up on the thread that it would be valuable for me to respond to.