- Joined
- Aug 6, 2016
“I do not call people insane because they differ with me.”
Elizabeth Parsons Ware Packard
(1816-1897)
Quotes said by Dr. Duncanson,
at her January, 1864 trial
(Photo-Public Domain)
Elizabeth Parsons Ware Packard
(1816-1897)
Quotes said by Dr. Duncanson,
at her January, 1864 trial
(Photo-Public Domain)
Massachusetts pastor Samuel Ware lived in a day when father’s controlled their daughters and that’s what he did when he insisted his eldest and only daughter marry Theophilius Packard a man fourteen years older than Elizabeth. Mr. Packard was an active member of her father’s church and at first it appears to be an amicable relationship. That is until - - - Elizabeth decided to have a mind of her own which eventually her husband would successfully claim she had “lost that mind”.
After their marriage in 1839, the twenty-three year old Elizabeth moved with her husband to Kankakee Illinois. By this time Theophilus Packard Jr., was Reverend Packard a Calvinist minister. After twenty years of marriage Elizabeth could no longer tolerate her husband’s strict religious teachings and began to publicly speak out against it.
One day in 1859 a door-to-door sewing machine salesman came to her door. During his visit Elizabeth could not help herself when the subject turned to her husband and his religious views. He listened intently and upon departing the family home he visited Mr. Packard. On June 18, 1860 a sheriff visited Mrs. Packard and it wasn’t a social call. He came to arrest Elizabeth. Her crime - complaining about her husband’s religious beliefs; the charge - insanity, for you see the sewing machine salesman was Dr. J W Brown and his job that day was to evaluate Elizabeth’s mental state at the request of her husband.
After their marriage in 1839, the twenty-three year old Elizabeth moved with her husband to Kankakee Illinois. By this time Theophilus Packard Jr., was Reverend Packard a Calvinist minister. After twenty years of marriage Elizabeth could no longer tolerate her husband’s strict religious teachings and began to publicly speak out against it.
One day in 1859 a door-to-door sewing machine salesman came to her door. During his visit Elizabeth could not help herself when the subject turned to her husband and his religious views. He listened intently and upon departing the family home he visited Mr. Packard. On June 18, 1860 a sheriff visited Mrs. Packard and it wasn’t a social call. He came to arrest Elizabeth. Her crime - complaining about her husband’s religious beliefs; the charge - insanity, for you see the sewing machine salesman was Dr. J W Brown and his job that day was to evaluate Elizabeth’s mental state at the request of her husband.
A Husband’s Problem is Solved!!
Women were often the targets of being sent to insane asylums. They had fewer rights and were usually under the control of a man rather it be father, husband, brother or son and in the mid-1800’s it was a man’s world. The symptoms qualifying a woman to be admitted into an asylum could range from:
“depression after the death of loved one, use of abusive language, and suppressed menstruation . . . . Diagnoses such as epilepsy and nymphomania were not looked at as diseases, but as bouts of insanity. Women were also diagnosed with insanity when they exhibited symptoms of overexertion.” {3}
If a female family member showed any signs of “disturbing” behavior it was easier to ship her off and put her away than to deal with her actions. The concept of female hormones and things like "baby blues” or as we know it today as postpartum depression or menopause were not understood. The common belief was that was something wrong in the head of the woman and the solution was to place her in an institution.
Dr. Carlos F. MacDonald (1845-1926) has his place in history as the doctor that was involved in the design of the first electric chair and proclaimed after an examination that the assassin for President William McKinley, Leon F. Czolgosz was sane enough to be strapped into it. But he also was a premier psychiatrist and had his own views on the treatment of postpartum depression. If a tepid bath did not help her then there was opium. It may cure her but it gave her another problem.
The alarm for the use of opium as a treatment for mental ailments was first questioned in an editorial published on September 4, 1833 in the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal . It begins with a question:
“depression after the death of loved one, use of abusive language, and suppressed menstruation . . . . Diagnoses such as epilepsy and nymphomania were not looked at as diseases, but as bouts of insanity. Women were also diagnosed with insanity when they exhibited symptoms of overexertion.” {3}
If a female family member showed any signs of “disturbing” behavior it was easier to ship her off and put her away than to deal with her actions. The concept of female hormones and things like "baby blues” or as we know it today as postpartum depression or menopause were not understood. The common belief was that was something wrong in the head of the woman and the solution was to place her in an institution.
Dr. Carlos F. MacDonald (1845-1926) has his place in history as the doctor that was involved in the design of the first electric chair and proclaimed after an examination that the assassin for President William McKinley, Leon F. Czolgosz was sane enough to be strapped into it. But he also was a premier psychiatrist and had his own views on the treatment of postpartum depression. If a tepid bath did not help her then there was opium. It may cure her but it gave her another problem.
The alarm for the use of opium as a treatment for mental ailments was first questioned in an editorial published on September 4, 1833 in the Boston Medical and Surgical Journal . It begins with a question:
“Is there any sure and safe method of curing a person of the habit of opium [use],
when that habit is confirmed by many years' of use of the article?
when that habit is confirmed by many years' of use of the article?
The author, a doctor, says he asks the question on behalf of a young woman who was prescribed opium to treat ‘a slight nervous irritation’. She's become ‘a bound and servile slave’ to the drug, and alarmed to realize she must increase her dose to avoid feeling sick. For almost a year, the doctor has tried everything he can think of, including substituting other drugs and attempting to wean the patient off opium. But she, ‘whilst under a course of gradual reduction or of substitution, convulsed for hour after hour in every muscle, and vomiting almost with intermission’.” {4}
We realize today she was withdrawing from her addiction.
January 1864
January 1864
While the Civil War enters the new year and are awaiting the battles yet to come on January 13th, Judge Charles R Starr of Kankakee Illinois bangs down his gavel beginning a trial known as Packard v Packard. The Plaintiff is Reverend Theophilus Packard, Jr. and the Defendant is his wife. The complaint: “That his wife was insane and that he was therefore entitled to confine her at home.” {5}
From the moment Elizabeth was confined to the asylum she had been fighting for her freedom. In 1863 a release was granted after her oldest children advocated on her behalf. Although free from the asylum, the institution had deemed her “incurably insane” so her husband decided to take matters into his own hands. He forced her to remain in the nursery room of their home with windows nailed and boarded and the door locked, making her a prisoner in her own home. Ironically the law permitted Mr. Packard to commit his wife into an asylum, but not keep her prisoner in the family home. Elizabeth eventually was able to drop a letter from a window to her friend in hopes of finding help in her situation. The letter found its way to Judge Starr and on January 12, 1864 the Packard’s were ordered to appear before him. Mr. Packard produced the letter from the asylum that declared his wife “incurable insane”. He further went on to claim he was employing:
From the moment Elizabeth was confined to the asylum she had been fighting for her freedom. In 1863 a release was granted after her oldest children advocated on her behalf. Although free from the asylum, the institution had deemed her “incurably insane” so her husband decided to take matters into his own hands. He forced her to remain in the nursery room of their home with windows nailed and boarded and the door locked, making her a prisoner in her own home. Ironically the law permitted Mr. Packard to commit his wife into an asylum, but not keep her prisoner in the family home. Elizabeth eventually was able to drop a letter from a window to her friend in hopes of finding help in her situation. The letter found its way to Judge Starr and on January 12, 1864 the Packard’s were ordered to appear before him. Mr. Packard produced the letter from the asylum that declared his wife “incurable insane”. He further went on to claim he was employing:
“all the liberty compatible with her welfare and safety.” {2)
Fortunately for Elizabeth the Judge was not satisfied and now they face each other in an Illinois courtroom.
Mr. Packard went first:
Fortunately for Elizabeth the Judge was not satisfied and now they face each other in an Illinois courtroom.
Mr. Packard went first:
“Physicians who had spoken with Elizabeth prior to her commitment to the Illinois State Hospital testified against her. One of these doctors, Dr. J. W. Brown, had conversed with Elizabeth under false pretenses, introducing himself as a sewing machine salesman to interview her and assess her mental state. He testified that she had “disliked to be called insane,” and he found her feelings towards her husband and religious beliefs to be evidence of her insanity. The Reverend’s sister and brother-in-law also testified that Packard had tried to distance herself from her husband and the church, both of which they deemed an indication of her insanity.”
Then the court heard from Elizabeth’s side:
“lawyers called neighbors and friends to testify on her behalf, and Packard was permitted to read an essay she had written for a Bible class to share insight into her religious beliefs. Dr. Duncanson, a doctor and a theologian, also testified for Packard’s sanity. He had spent hours talking with Packard and disagreed with Dr. Brown’s understanding of her religious statements, stating that many of her ideas and doctrines were embraced in Swedenborgianism. Dr. Duncanson argued that many intellectuals and theologians in Europe favored these New School doctrines.” {above from 2}
[He went on to describe his impressions from his conversation with Packard:]
“On every topic I introduced, she was perfectly familiar, and discussed them with an intelligence that at once showed she was possessed of a good education, and a strong and vigorous mind. I did not agree with her in sentiment on many things, but I do not call people insane because they differ from me, nor even a majority, even, of people.” {2}
[He went on to describe his impressions from his conversation with Packard:]
“On every topic I introduced, she was perfectly familiar, and discussed them with an intelligence that at once showed she was possessed of a good education, and a strong and vigorous mind. I did not agree with her in sentiment on many things, but I do not call people insane because they differ from me, nor even a majority, even, of people.” {2}
It took the all-male jury just seven minutes to find in Mrs. Packard’s favor.
Judge Starr ordered that Elizabeth Packard:
“be relieved of all restraints incompatible with her condition as a sane women” to restore her liberty.” {2}
Elizabeth never returned to her husband nor divorced him but she did stay close to her children.
*
Judge Starr ordered that Elizabeth Packard:
“be relieved of all restraints incompatible with her condition as a sane women” to restore her liberty.” {2}
Elizabeth never returned to her husband nor divorced him but she did stay close to her children.
*
Elizabeth dedicated the rest of her life. Experiencing being incarcerated against her will and knowing the status of women’s rights she founded the “Anti-Insane Asylum Society”. Although it never grew into a major national movement she did establish her goals:
— To never consent to enter an asylum as a patient
— To never consent to have any relative or friend entered into an asylum as a patient
— That if [members] or anyone in their family became insane, they would be taken care of in their own homes
— That these people would be kindly and patiently cared for
— That if relatives of the unfortunates could not provide for their care, the Society would “furnish them the means for doing so”
— That the fund for helping unfortunates should be bestowed by a committee of the Society after investigation of the case. {6}
She authored several books about her experience but perhaps her greatest achievement was when when in 1867 the State of Illinois passed the “Bill for the Protection of Personal Liberty”. This guaranteed:
“all people accused of insanity, including wives, had the right to a public trial.” {1}
She lived to see the same bill pass in three states. Her home state of Massachusetts, Iowa, and Maine.
She lived to see the same bill pass in three states. Her home state of Massachusetts, Iowa, and Maine.
In 1874 she was hoping to meet with the Postmaster General to request asylum inmates have mail access. She was not allowed an audience so Mrs. Packard decided she would go right to the top. She walked to the White House and introduced herself to Julia Grant. Julia liked what she saw and arranged a meeting with President Ulysses Grant. In 1875 Congress passed a bill granting asylum inmates access to on-site federal post officers {7}
*
She died on July 25, 1897. She was a remarkable woman surviving the horrors of a wife under a controlling husband in a time when just by his words - her life was changed forever. In her 1867 book she titled “Marital Power Exemplified” she wrote of her experience:
“I regarded the principle of religious tolerance as the vital principle on which our government was based, and I in my ignorance supposed this right was protected to all American citizens, even to the wives of clergymen. But, alas! my own sad experience has taught me the danger of believing a lie on so vital a question. The result was, I was legally kidnapped and imprisoned three years simply for uttering these opinions under these circumstances.” {2}
“I regarded the principle of religious tolerance as the vital principle on which our government was based, and I in my ignorance supposed this right was protected to all American citizens, even to the wives of clergymen. But, alas! my own sad experience has taught me the danger of believing a lie on so vital a question. The result was, I was legally kidnapped and imprisoned three years simply for uttering these opinions under these circumstances.” {2}
* * * * *
Sources
1. https://www.hhhistory.com/2015/04/historic-heroism-elizabeth-parsons-ware.htm
2. https://publish.illinois.edu/ihlc-blog/2019/03/28/elizabeth-packard-legal-and-mental-health-reformer/
3. https://minds.wisconsin.edu/bitstream/handle/1793/6687/Lunacy in the 19th Century.pdf?sequence=1
4. https://www.wbur.org/commonhealth/2017/08/01/opium-history-addiction
5. https://law.jrank.org/pages/2582/Packard-v-Packard-1864.html
6. https://hhhasylum.com/anti-insane-asylum-society/
7. https://www.encyclopedia.com/women/...nscripts-and-maps/packard-elizabeth-1816-1897
And this thread that started my quest for answers on women, mental illness and the power of men:
https://civilwartalk.com/threads/mary-lincoln-chemical-addictions.182502/