I subscribe and I enjoy it very much. It is a quality magazine.
We're on an upswing in the quality of Civil War magazines. At first, there was only one magazine for the general public, Civil War Times Illustrated. When that first started it had quality articles from great historians. Then in the 1980s it started to take a nose dive and the good historians weren't in it, being replaced by freelance journalists for the most part, along with some enthusiasts, and the quality was bad. Blue & Gray came out and was pretty good. America's Civil War came out and it was another that featured mostly freelance journalists. Gettysburg Magazine has been a quality publication since its inception. For awhile, the Civil War Society published Civil War, which was their official magazine. It had a few good articles in it. IMO things took an upswing when North and South came out. It was a game changer. It featured high quality articles, good historians, and excellent maps. It forced the others to raise the level of their games. America's Civil War seems to me to have lured away their mapmaker, because they now have those excellent maps. Civil War Times is back up to having good articles with good historians, though it also has some freelancers as well. Civil War Monitor is a worthy addition with contributions from top historians and great features that cover a variety of interests in different aspects of the war. My sense is the upswing began with North and South. If it weren't for that quality publication, we may not have seen the increase in quality.