1. Welcome to the CivilWarTalk, a forum for questions and discussions about the American Civil War! Become a member today for full access to all of our resources, it's fast, simple, and absolutely free!
Dismiss Notice
Join and Become a Patron at CivilWarTalk!
Support this site with a monthly or yearly subscription! Active Patrons get to browse the site Ad free!
START BY JOINING NOW!

Proud To Be A Rebel. A Fair Answer

Discussion in 'Civil War History - General Discussion' started by ucvrelics.com, Nov 3, 2018.

  1. ucvrelics.com

    ucvrelics.com 1st Lieutenant Forum Host

    Joined:
    May 7, 2016
    Messages:
    4,889
    Location:
    Alabama
    Nuff Said:D

    proud to be a rebel.jpg
     
    James N., 22ndGa, Rebelsoul and 29 others like this.

  2. (Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)
  3. DanSBHawk

    DanSBHawk Sergeant

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Messages:
    925
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Washington fought to create this nation, while the confederate fought to tear it apart.
     
    TomP, OpnCoronet, GwilymT and 5 others like this.
  4. Drew

    Drew Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    Messages:
    7,323
    Actually, the Confederates fought to leave it, to go away, not to, “tear it apart.”

    You all could have kept it, but without income from cotton. This was unacceptable, apparently.
     
  5. TomV71

    TomV71 Private Silver Patron

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2018
    Messages:
    218
    Location:
    Norway
    Not tear it apart, divide it. :wink:
     
  6. leftyhunter

    leftyhunter Colonel

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    13,669
    Location:
    los angeles ca
    Not exactly leave it. The Confederacy tried to violently seize the New Mexico Territory, Maryland , Kentucky and Missouri. Had the Confederacy won in the battle of Glorieta Pass they would if moved further West to capture Southern California.
    @jgoodguy has a thread with sources that the Confederacy wished to seize Northern Mexico. In the antebellum era slave owners had financed attempts to seize Nicaragua. No doubt if the Confederacy won they would try again.
    So no the Confederacy was not at all interested in being " left alone".
    Leftyhunter
     
    GwilymT and Brendan like this.
  7. Drew

    Drew Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    Messages:
    7,323
    They did? Wow.

    Maybe you can source some of this stuff? I thought Lincoln went for some of these places first?

    Nicaragua and all of that was definitely not a unifying issue in the South. You can’t put a handful on, “them,” but I know you’ll try.
     
  8. BlueandGrayl

    BlueandGrayl Sergeant

    Joined:
    May 27, 2018
    Messages:
    888
    Location:
    Corona, California
    The thing was given that the southern (no pun intended) halves of those states you mentioned had significant pro-Confederate support there was a good reason for this to occur.

    It should also be noted Maryland was not in danger of secession and just like Delaware slavery was declining for a long time and had a large free black community. Even when Lee invaded Maryland in 1862 he did not intend on taking over the state and annexing it for the Confederacy he just wanted to invade the North to bring about a peace.

    Kentucky and Missouri were considerably more divided between Confederate and Union supporters.

    The whole seizure of places like Northern Mexico really is more because of certain resources.
     
    Stone in the wall likes this.
  9. 1NCCAV

    1NCCAV Corporal

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2016
    Messages:
    463
    We’ve gone down this road with similar threads before. I predict several pages of point/counterpoint and tit for tat. And when it’s over, everyone will still believe what they started out believing.
     
  10. WJC

    WJC Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2015
    Messages:
    8,808
    "A fair answer" indeed. One has to be impressed with the straightforward answer acknowledging that the rebels of 1860 and those 1776 were alike. That seems to be a common perspective among those in the generation that fought the Civil War and those immediately after. Some today would have us believe that though Washington, et al. were traitors to their King, Davis, et al. were not traitors to their government. It is a mystery why so many feel the need to hide that fact, especially when their acts were forgiven and the nation reconciled.
     
    jgoodguy, RebelWeber and BlueandGrayl like this.
  11. WJC

    WJC Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2015
    Messages:
    8,808
    Yet the Lincoln Administration had to use extraordinary, unconstitutional means to prevent Maryland from seceding.
     
  12. Polloco

    Polloco Corporal

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2018
    Messages:
    264
    The key word is rebel. Yes a Washington was a Rebel.
     
    CSA Today, Rebelsoul, Klaudly and 5 others like this.
  13. WJC

    WJC Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2015
    Messages:
    8,808
    That's the nature of this Forum and any discussion of the Civil War. Much information is shared, much is learned, few opinions are changed. If one seeks only to change opinions, the Civil War is not a good starting point.
     
  14. WJC

    WJC Moderator Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2015
    Messages:
    8,808
    'Making war to win peace'. Isn't that the claim of every 'leader' in war?
     
  15. Polloco

    Polloco Corporal

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2018
    Messages:
    264
    I've only been a member for less than 2 months and I can tell there are several very opinionated people in this forum. Sort of like the politicians who started the whole thing in the first place.
     
  16. BlueandGrayl

    BlueandGrayl Sergeant

    Joined:
    May 27, 2018
    Messages:
    888
    Location:
    Corona, California
    Well here's the thing: Maryland's governor was a Unionist (like Delaware) and nearly half of its population was black (free to be precise) and the rest of Maryland was not slavery heavy so other than the whole Baltimore thing (occurring in a city with a large free black population) it was not in danger that much.
     
  17. John Hartwell

    John Hartwell Major Forum Host

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    7,848
    Location:
    Central Massachusetts
    There's no shame in being labeled a "rebel" or a "traitor." My own ancestors have been called such things by, perhaps, half a dozen different regimes.

    But, it seems to me you can't say "I'm proud to be pro-Confederate," without also meaning "I'm proud to be pro-slavery." The two things are just too inseparable. Sure, the confederacy meant other things besides slavery. But, take slavery out of the mix and there would have been no secession, no confederacy.
     
  18. Drew

    Drew Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    Messages:
    7,323
    So why did Lincoln round up the Maryland legislature and throw them in jail?
     
    CSA Today, CCMDCSA, BillO and 2 others like this.
  19. BlueandGrayl

    BlueandGrayl Sergeant

    Joined:
    May 27, 2018
    Messages:
    888
    Location:
    Corona, California
    Most of Maryland's legislature was Unionist aside from those pro-Confederates unlike the neutrality tried by Kentucky and Missouri
     

  20. FREDERICK, September 12, 1861.
    Honorable W. H. SEWARD, Secretary of State, Washington, D. C.

    SIR: An adjourned session of the Legislature of Maryland will meet in extra session at this place on Tuesday, 17th instant.
    Many loyal citizens believe that at the coming session some effort will be made on the part of the "Tory" majority to convulse the State and force it into an attitude of hostility to the Government. Already it is believed in intelligent quarters that at the last extra session it was decided in a caucus of the majority to pass an ordinance of secession at their next meeting at all hazards. Perhaps, sir, these beliefs are unfounded apprehensions but the magnitude of the risk should leave no foothold for uncertainty, and surely the course of the legislative majority has not been one to inspire confidence. Prevention of evil is what the loyal citizens of Maryland desire and this is almost secured by the interposition of the Federal Government in the arrest and detention of Thomas J. McKaig, State senator from Allegany.

    There are twenty-two senators, of whom twelve is the requisite majority to enact a law. Of the present senators eight are loyal and reliable, leaving fourteen in whom I have no faith and I speak the sentiment of many.

    Of the fourteen referred to McKaig as already stated is a political prisoner; Yellott is among the rebels and we do not fear he will return; and it is rumored that Heckart is evading the Federal authorities. If this rumor be true and Heckart remains away the people will feel secure from legislative disloyalty; but if not true we hold it to be the duty of the Federal Government under its constitutional obligation (Article IV, section 4) to guarantee to Maryland a republican form of government and protect her from domestic violence; to interpose and cause the arrest of those senators whose notorious disaffection to the Govenment causes popular alarm here and is calculated to produce civil strife under pretext of law.

    I should have referred this subject to your honorable colleague, the Postmaster-General, with whom I have a personal acquaintance, but for his absence from the seat of government as announced in the public journals and but for the fact that a longer delay would be impolitic. These desultory remarks hastily thrown together may still be suggestive, and if they produce the result I desire in guaranteeing order and security in Maryland I shall feel that I have done a good work in bringing the subject to your notice.

    With sentiments of great respect, your obedient servant,
    FREDERICK SCHLEY,
    Editor of the Examiner.
     
  21. BlueandGrayl

    BlueandGrayl Sergeant

    Joined:
    May 27, 2018
    Messages:
    888
    Location:
    Corona, California
    Well there was a meeting by the Maryland Legislature though most of them were non-neutral pro-Union and only a minority pro-Confederate.
     
    John Hartwell and jgoodguy like this.

(Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)

Share This Page


(Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)