- Aug 3, 2019
You're the one who challenged what he said by placing him back in 1860. I've simply pointed out his stated approach to interpreting and applying the Constitution when he was deciding actual cases. So - using your moving him back in time 150 years - this is how he would have decided that case and the meaning of the document. Feel free to point out why he would have done differently.Unless he has a law to apply. Otherwise, he only has an unproved opinion.