1. Welcome to the CivilWarTalk, a forum for questions and discussions about the American Civil War! Become a member today for full access to all of our resources, it's fast, simple, and absolutely free!
Dismiss Notice
Join and Become a Patron at CivilWarTalk!
Support this site with a monthly or yearly subscription! Active Patrons get to browse the site Ad free!
START BY JOINING NOW!

Interview: Longstreet on Gettysburg Controversies

Discussion in 'James Longstreet' started by lelliott19, Nov 8, 2018.

  1. lelliott19

    lelliott19 1st Lieutenant Forum Host Silver Patron Trivia Game Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2013
    Messages:
    4,340
    Controversies.JPG On the occasion of Longstreet's visit to Antietam in 1893, a correspondent of the Washington Post recorded the General's opinions on a number of topics. In this part of the interview, General Longstreet discusses controversies after Gettysburg.

    ...The general then proceeded to discuss some of the controversies at the South concerning Gettysburg, and said with some feeling that a deliberate attempt had been made by ignorant demagogues to mislead the people as to his relations with Lee at the battle and afterward. He stated positively that Lee personally had never criticized or found fault with his operations on that field. I therefore asked: "I have heard it intimated, general, by some prejudiced people, that Lee, on account of coldness growing out of Gettysburg, to be rid of you, brought about your transfer to the West."

    General Longstreet smiled at this suggestion and answered promptly: "On the contrary, he was at first strongly opposed to my going, and suggested another advance into Maryland that fall instead. I first proposed going West in the Spring of 1863, after Chancellorsville. I firmly believed up to Gettysburg and Vicksburg that we could win by concentrating an overwhelming force suddenly against Rosecrans. After whipping him and establishing ourselves on the Ohio, I held that the Mississippi Valley would instantly have cleared itself up to the Ohio's mouth, as Grant would have been withdrawn to defend Ohio and Indiana. This would have saved to the Confederacy some sixty thousand men lost at Vicksburg, Port Hudson and Gettysburg.

    "The proposal was coldly received by the Richmond authorities. They preferred to meet the enemy in the West with detachments; always with the weaker force at the point of contact. After Vicksburg and Gettysburg, when the darker clouds began to gather, I suggested it again to Lee, and wrote urging it upon Secretary Seddon. General Lee eventually went down to Richmond upon this business, and the Western concentration was finally agreed upon. Something had to be done. In fact, it was then too late; we were too weak everywhere to effect the concentration of the forces I considered necessary to accomplish Rosecrans's[sic] destruction."
    Interview: Reprinted from the Washington Post of June 1893, the interview appeared in The Times Dispatch. (Richmond, VA.), November 12, 1911, page 3.
    Image: http://porterbriggs.com/james-longstreet/

    Note: This post is Part 16 of a series on Longstreet's opinions of various Generals, expressed during an interview with a Washington Post corespondent in 1893. Longstreet's opinions on various generals are posted in separate threads so they can be easily located - Bragg, Jackson, A P Hill, Early, Ewell, Pickett, Sheridan, Joe Johnston, Beauregard, Hood, Jeff Davis, Lee, McClellan, and more. Here are the links to Parts 1-15, posted previously:
    Part 1 - Intro to the article
    Part 2 - Longstreet on Bragg
    Part 3 - Longstreet on Jackson
    Part 4 - Longstreet on AP Hill
    Part 5 - Longstreet on Ewell & Early
    Part 6 - Longstreet on Pickett, Sheridan, Five Forks & the Timing of the Surrender
    Part 7 - Longstreet on Joe Johnston
    Part 8 - Longstreet on Beauregard
    Part 9 - Longstreet on Hood
    Part 10 - Longstreet on Lee's military attributes
    Part 11 - Lee's Best Battle
    Part 12 - Lee's Poorest Generalship
    Part 13 - Lee's greatest weakness as tactical commander
    Part 14 - Lee's tactical weakness at Gettysburg
    Part 15 - Meade's Lost Opportunity

    <Up next - Longstreet on his relationship with Lee post-Gettysburg.>
    @Eleanor Rose @Union_Buff @FarawayFriend @War Horse @novushomus @GELongstreet @LeesWarhorse @Tom Elmore @Coonewah Creek @Yankeedave @Andy Cardinal @PeterT @Zella If you aren't tagged and would like to receive notification when these are posted, let me know and Ill tag you in future ones.
     

  2. (Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)
  3. FarawayFriend

    FarawayFriend Major Silver Patron Trivia Game Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Messages:
    8,280
    Location:
    Hannover, Germany
    As for the painting… I though that Longstreet was very tall, more than 6 ft., while I always imagined Lee to be shorter. Is that true or is it a false image based on the movie "Gettysburg"?? :D
    In that painting both men appear to be equally tall, although Lee is even standing a bit behind Longstreet..
     
    Zella, Eleanor Rose and lelliott19 like this.
  4. ErnieMac

    ErnieMac Major Forum Host Trivia Game Winner

    Joined:
    May 3, 2013
    Messages:
    7,564
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Lee is noted as being about 5'-10" (178 cm) while Longstreet was 6'-2" (188 cm). You've been watching Martin Sheen (5'-7" - 170 cm) too much. :D
     
    lelliott19, Zella, James N. and 2 others like this.
  5. Eleanor Rose

    Eleanor Rose 1st Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2016
    Messages:
    4,433
    Location:
    central NC
    C'mon @FarawayFriend, you know General Longstreet is a "giant among men" in our hearts. :giggle: Seriously I have read several accounts that match with @ErnieMac's post.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Eleanor Rose

    Eleanor Rose 1st Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2016
    Messages:
    4,433
    Location:
    central NC
    As I understand it, the decision to send General Longstreet to the Western theater was a last minute one - after Knoxville fell to one Federal army and Chattanooga to another. In fact, General Longstreet made the case for a strategic concentration in Tennessee on more than one occasion. He first made the case for it in May, 1863, after Lee’s victory at Chancellorsville. General Lee strongly opposed it.
     
    Andersonh1 and lelliott19 like this.
  7. FarawayFriend

    FarawayFriend Major Silver Patron Trivia Game Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2013
    Messages:
    8,280
    Location:
    Hannover, Germany
    Obviously!! :dance:
    (and speaking of the movie … @Eleanor Rose I'm not sure how much Tom Berenger has to do with my partiality for General Longstreet … even with that awful false beard ….)

    Longstreet.JPG

    :rolleyes:
     
  8. Scott Bowden

    Scott Bowden Corporal

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    Location:
    Marfa, Texas
    Longstreet's "memories" were often at odds with his writings at the time of the events, as this excerpt clearly demonstrates.
     
  9. James N.

    James N. Major Forum Host Civil War Photo Contest
    Annual Winner
    Featured Book Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2013
    Messages:
    9,625
    Location:
    East Texas
    I'm shock - I say, SHOCKED! I can't imagine who he could possibly have in mind - much less that any scoundrel would do such a thing! (Old Jube/Pendleton, anyone?)
     
  10. Eleanor Rose

    Eleanor Rose 1st Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2016
    Messages:
    4,433
    Location:
    central NC
    He definitely made me swoon.
     
    FarawayFriend, lelliott19 and Zella like this.
  11. Eleanor Rose

    Eleanor Rose 1st Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2016
    Messages:
    4,433
    Location:
    central NC
    How does this particular excerpt clearly demonstrate this? I'm not asking to be argumentative. I'm just not sure where you see discrepancies within this particular excerpt. I know there are discrepancies in Longstreet's memoir.
     
    lelliott19 likes this.
  12. Northern Light

    Northern Light Major

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2014
    Messages:
    9,594
    :wub:
     
  13. Scott Bowden

    Scott Bowden Corporal

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    295
    Location:
    Marfa, Texas
    Hi,

    Texas Senator Louis Trezevant Wigfall was one of Longstreet's confidants in the Confederate government. Wigfall was a "Western Solutionist," meaning that he favored pulling forces from Lee's army and shipping them west. Longstreet's letter to Wigfall dated May 13, 1863 (Library of Congress, Louis T. Wigfall Papers) is totally at odds with his later memory concerning this subject, specifically with the second paragraph of this excerpt (a significant portion of Longstreet's later-in-life claims about Lee and The War can be easily impeached by his own writings made at or close to the time of the events).

    I discuss this at length in Last Chance for Victory: Robert E. Lee and the Gettysburg Campaign.

    Regards,
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2018
    lelliott19 and James N. like this.

(Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)

Share This Page


(Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)