"How much money do historians make from all the writing they do?"


Fewer ads. Lots of American Civil War content!
JOIN NOW: REGISTER HERE!

Drew

Major
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
7,813
From @John Hartwell's link:

"One historian told me the most money he’d ever made off of a book was $1500 in royalties; none of his other books had come close. Another told me she’d received a $2000 advance, but had never received any royalties."


This is a losing proposition, but God Bless those who go forward with it.

They make the rest of us a lot smarter.
 

JPK Huson 1863

Brev. Brig. Gen'l
Forum Host
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
18,656
Location
Central Pennsylvania
I've never been sure why we like to keep academics underpaid, like it's a rite of passage or some poverty inducing hair shirt proving one's commitment to their field. My son told me there's a 16 year old millionaire out there, whose work consists of opening packages on You Tube. You do like seeing kids using all this tech to achieve a different lifestyle and more, I'm a little smitten by the various creative ways they find to do it. This kind of thing isn't, however, necessary to further mankind's knowledge. Surely it can't be a good thing to keep historians and academics in general financially confined when their work is so valuable?
 

Robtweb1

2nd Lieutenant
Forum Host
Retired Moderator
Civil War Photo Contest
Annual Winner
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Messages
3,010
Location
Grand Junction, TN
Depends on a lot of variables. Self published or by an established publisher who will handle advertising, distribution, etc. If self published you have to put an effort (and maybe some money) on getting the word out. I self published mine and though it's on Amazon, the only time any sell is if I post something online or speak at a civil war roundtable or something like that. The answer to the original question is not much.
 

Saint Jude

First Sergeant
Joined
Oct 15, 2018
Messages
1,033
Location
Heaven
I think most authors are lucky if they end up with a buck per copy. (But, then, if you sell a million copies... ) For professional historians, it's mainly about tenure, reputation, or love of the subject.
 
Last edited:

rbasin

Sergeant Major
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
2,455
Location
Tampa, Fl
Unfortunately, history is not a big seller in the U.S., unless its make-believe. If we are talking about ACW writings, most are just re-hashing someone else's material. Seems like almost every year, there is yet another definitive book on Lincoln. Its no different from the one from the year before, but its definitive.
 

Drew

Major
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
7,813
Unfortunately, history is not a big seller in the U.S., unless its make-believe. If we are talking about ACW writings, most are just re-hashing someone else's material. Seems like almost every year, there is yet another definitive book on Lincoln. Its no different from the one from the year before, but its definitive.
This is a picture to the "Lincoln Tower" at Peterson House in Washington, DC. Every one of them is about Lincoln.

Peterson House Tower.jpg
 

huskerblitz

Captain
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
6,911
Location
Nebraska
I've never been sure why we like to keep academics underpaid, like it's a rite of passage or some poverty inducing hair shirt proving one's commitment to their field. My son told me there's a 16 year old millionaire out there, whose work consists of opening packages on You Tube. You do like seeing kids using all this tech to achieve a different lifestyle and more, I'm a little smitten by the various creative ways they find to do it. This kind of thing isn't, however, necessary to further mankind's knowledge. Surely it can't be a good thing to keep historians and academics in general financially confined when their work is so valuable?
Being in education and not wanting to get into politics and the like, the short answer is those in academics do not produce a product that can be sold for profit (meaning educating students). Instead, we are paid by tax dollars and there is only so much to go around or we wind up paying considerably more in taxes. Yes, it's a sad commentary but it's true.

This is a picture to the "Lincoln Tower" at Peterson House in Washington, DC. Every one of them is about Lincoln.

View attachment 299048
As impressive as this is to see, it's also important to note that there are multiple copies of the same book in the tower. I was initially led to believe it was all the books about Lincoln (singular copy of each one). I was a little disappointed after seeing it and realizing it wasn't what I thought it was.
 

Zella

2nd Lieutenant
Forum Host
Joined
May 23, 2018
Messages
2,617
Depends on a lot of variables. Self published or by an established publisher who will handle advertising, distribution, etc. If self published you have to put an effort (and maybe some money) on getting the word out. I self published mine and though it's on Amazon, the only time any sell is if I post something online or speak at a civil war roundtable or something like that. The answer to the original question is not much.
Yes, self-publishing requires a lot more work than people often imagine. But even traditionally published authors are expected to put a lot more personal effort into marketing than they did in years past, with the rise of online sales and decline of bookstores. Publishers, including the academic ones, can and do factor an author's social media presence and prowess into decisions about picking up a manuscript and then expect the authors to take the lead on a lot of things that company PR used to do.
 

DRW

Sergeant
Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Messages
816
Location
New York
I'm assuming that for many authors the financial advantage comes from being able to deduct research expenses.
 


Fewer ads. Lots of American Civil War content!
JOIN NOW: REGISTER HERE!
Top