Did Lee do much as "General in Chief" or was this in name only? Was 99% of his time and efforts focused on commanding ANV to the detriment of grand strategy?
Would the CSA have been better served with someone else focused on this role and the grand strategy component versus having someone else preoccupied w/ managing the Virginia front?
Or did it not matter because Davis was really calling the shots from a grand strategy perspective anyway?
mike
Would the CSA have been better served with someone else focused on this role and the grand strategy component versus having someone else preoccupied w/ managing the Virginia front?
Or did it not matter because Davis was really calling the shots from a grand strategy perspective anyway?
mike