cash
Brev. Brig. Gen'l
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2005
- Location
- Right here.
I don't know why one would expect evidence when the ones asking never have any for their opinion. Just the way I see it.
Let’s be fair Reb, maybe they think their personal opinion or some newly discovered information by some amateur historian hack is all the evidence we need to know.
Summation: Evidence offered in opposition to various claims of those offering the opinion that Lincoln was at fault can be found at posts:
11, 15, 24, 45, 66, 74, 92, 99, 106, 109, 124, 132, 146, 147, 168, 182, 196, 232, 235, 237, 259, 267, 278, 323, 325, 327, 344, 356, 377, 401, 421, 430, 444, 453, 467, 469, 472, 474, 476, 478, 479, 480, 481, 581, 594, 625, 630, 636, 640, 642, 643, 645, 661, 677, 680, 681, 694, 696, 699, 714, 715, 717, 723, 741, 755, 717, 723, 741, 755, 769, 820, 823, 830, and 832, all ignored by those holding the opinion that Lincoln was at fault.
Evidence offered by those who hold the opinion that Lincoln was at fault [excluding the article at the OP]:
Post 254, shown by post 327 to not support the claim made.
Post 391, shown by posts 402, 403, and 405 to not support the claim made.
Post 498, which applies to Charleston only and not to the south as a whole as claimed.
Post 639, rebutted by post 642.
Post 679
Post 797, shown by posts 798, 800, 801, 810, and 824 to not support the claim made.
Quite obviously, the two claims quoted above are deliberate falsehoods. I'll leave it to others to determine what that makes those two posters to be.