- Joined
- Oct 10, 2012
- Location
- Mt. Jackson, Va
Posing with a Spencer Rifle.
Either the blouse is to small or he forgot to button them..Would there be any particular reason for his blouse buttons to be undone?
Lubliner.
As far as his blouse buttons , maybe he tried the Napoleon - Little Mac pose with his hand in that position .
A photographer wouldn't have a brand-new first-rate latest-model weapon like this as a prop.I don't think its his but a prop.
It basically IS - it's merely a canvas stretched on a frame so as to best catch and reflect available light - here's a similar one from my collection I've posted before that shows details of the arrangement a little better:That sure looks like a "pop up" studio!
Would there be any particular reason for his blouse buttons to be undone?
Lubliner.
Either the blouse is to small or he forgot to button them..
Looks like he missed a button on his trousers too . As far as his blouse buttons , maybe he tried the Napoleon - Little Mac pose with his hand in that position .
As unlikely and silly as it may seem to us now, the answer is probably and simply fashion. One of the best descriptions I ever read - sorry, at this distance I now have absolutely NO idea where - of the appearance of a "typical" Civil War soldier is an umade bed.Perhaps he keeps a jar in there, a half pint maybe.
Why I use a sleeping bag! Actually the idea of numerous poses possibly puts the gentleman in the picture as imitating the Napoleonic look. Change ups in poses could be the fault, so knowing the photographer was desiring to portray the man as the man saw fit, I doubt it was just negligence or a 'que sera' moment. (Great pic you added by the way).As unlikely and silly as it may seem to us now, the answer is probably and simply fashion. One of the best descriptions I ever read - sorry, at this distance I now have absolutely NO idea where - of the appearance of a "typical" Civil War soldier is an umade bed.
Maybe a previous photo was taken with his hand in the "Napoleon position." Edit: someone already posted a similar comment.Would there be any particular reason for his blouse buttons to be undone?
Lubliner.
and it is not a reversed image. that is a plus for a change!!The 5th Michigan was issued Spencer rifles and carried them at Gettysburg . Interesting to see his revolver has been removed from the holster and stuck in his belt for the image . I would think it wasn't ideal to hold the rifle with the muzzle on the floor , but with the receiver up the viewer can see it's a Spencer without a doubt .
is that a ROOT REVOLVER in his waistband?It basically IS - it's merely a canvas stretched on a frame so as to best catch and reflect available light - here's a similar one from my collection I've posted before that shows details of the arrangement a little better:
View attachment 394029
Why do you say that?? Everything about it is "reversed" from the side his buttons are on; the side his saber is suspended from; to the side of the Spencer the hammer is on. The only concession he's making to the normal "reversed" image produced by the camera is by holding the saber in the "wrong" hand on the "wrong" side.and it is not a reversed image. that is a plus for a change!!
Looks like the standard Colt 1860 Army to me - Colt Roots were small-caliber "pocket"-sized revolvers with the hammer on the right side of the frame.is that a ROOT REVOLVER in his waistband?