1. Welcome to the CivilWarTalk, a forum for questions and discussions about the American Civil War! Become a member today for full access to all of our resources, it's fast, simple, and absolutely free!
Dismiss Notice
Join and Become a Patron at CivilWarTalk!
Support this site with a monthly or yearly subscription! Active Patrons get to browse the site Ad free!
START BY JOINING NOW!

The Longstreet-Gettysburg Controversy

Discussion in 'Civil War History - General Discussion' started by Rebforever, Jan 6, 2017.

  1. cash

    cash Brev. Brig. Gen'l

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    24,745
    Location:
    Right here.
    That would be Hampton. Hampton would have been excellent leadership for the cavalry left behind.
     
    PeterT, Bee and War Horse like this.

  2. (Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)
  3. War Horse

    War Horse 1st Lieutenant Forum Host Silver Patron Trivia Game Winner Regtl. Quartermaster Gettysburg 2016 Member of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    4,689
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    Without a doubt.
     
  4. rpkennedy

    rpkennedy Major

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,543
    Location:
    Carlisle, PA
    Or split up Robertson and Jones. Grumble Jones was a good commander but suffered under the more senior Robertson.

    Ryan
     
    dlofting, Rebforever and PeterT like this.
  5. leftyhunter

    leftyhunter Captain

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    6,137
    Location:
    los angeles ca
    With perfect 20/20 hindsight could the AnV truly win? That is was it even possible for Lee to beat Meade to the same extent Thomas beat Hood at Nashville?
    In order for the AnV to advance to Philadelphia or Baltimore it has to thoroughly scatter the AoP then capture their supplies and hope they don't run into more Union troops. At the same time they can't afford heavy casualties as militia will most likely be harrasing them the whole time. Local milita as already killed some forgers.
    Leftyhunter
     
    Eagle eye and 8thFlorida like this.
  6. War Horse

    War Horse 1st Lieutenant Forum Host Silver Patron Trivia Game Winner Regtl. Quartermaster Gettysburg 2016 Member of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    4,689
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    Lefty, it didn't matter where the battle took place. Lee was looking to engage the AoP wherever he found them. Baltimore and Washington weren't even in the equation. Lee simply wanted to engage and defeat Hookers. Unbeknownst to him Meade was given command by Lincoln and he made several very good decisions that lead to the Union victory. One being remaining at Gettysburg.
     
    8thFlorida and PeterT like this.
  7. leftyhunter

    leftyhunter Captain

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    6,137
    Location:
    los angeles ca
    My question is more about was using 20/20 hindsight : did Lee have a realistic chance of beating the AoP in the first place? Lee not only has to thoroughly destroy the AoP he can't afford heavy casualties since the Confederacy can not replace their casualties the way the Union can and did.
    My understanding is that Lee's ultimate goal in the Pennsylvania Campaign is to destroy either Philadelphia or Baltimore in order to thoroughly demoralize Union public opinion. I don't have a source and I concede I could be wrong. On the other hand it makes sense that ultimately Lee needs to take out a major Union city.
    Leftyhunter
     
    Eagle eye and War Horse like this.
  8. War Horse

    War Horse 1st Lieutenant Forum Host Silver Patron Trivia Game Winner Regtl. Quartermaster Gettysburg 2016 Member of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    4,689
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    That's totally possible. As I understand it, Lee's intentions were to draw the Union army into the open and destroy them. Then to present Lincoln with terms of peace. Albeit his intentions have been debated for 150 years.
     
  9. cash

    cash Brev. Brig. Gen'l

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    24,745
    Location:
    Right here.
    Lee had a terrific chance for a victory. He did not need to thoroughly destroy the AotP. Defeating the AotP and forcing them to retreat out of Pennsylvania would inflict a devastating political defeat on the Lincoln Administration. It would have depressed Northern morale so that Democrats would win the elections in Ohio and Pennsylvania. With Clement Vallandigham as Governor of Ohio, we may even have seen Ohio troops pulled out of the war.
     
  10. GELongstreet

    GELongstreet 1st Lieutenant Trivia Game Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2011
    Messages:
    3,644
    Location:
    Germany
    Neither beating nor destroying requires to kill everybody. It would be enough to scatter them. Or to try to bag them piece after piece (a few more 2nd Winchesters) or to bring them into a position where the commander would, be it necessary or not, surrender. Most would do so instead of launching all-out assaults willing to sacrafice everyone. And if Meade had surrendered there probably would be some politicians in D.C. who´d be less eager to man the walls ...
     
  11. leftyhunter

    leftyhunter Captain

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    6,137
    Location:
    los angeles ca
    Not to argue it wasn't theoretically possible for the AnV to thoroughly beat the AoP; on the other hand with less men no outside logistical support was it realistically possible to drive the larger AoP out of Pennsylvania?
    Leftyhunter
     
  12. War Horse

    War Horse 1st Lieutenant Forum Host Silver Patron Trivia Game Winner Regtl. Quartermaster Gettysburg 2016 Member of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    4,689
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    Lee truly believed he could defeat the AoP and change the tide of war. Was it realistic? He sure came close didn't he. Better leadership saved the AoP. IMO
     
    PeterT likes this.
  13. 8thFlorida

    8thFlorida Private

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2016
    Messages:
    42
    And I recently read a book called Spies and Scouts of Gettysburg by Tom Ryan which explains why Stuart's absence was so significant. His contention is that the cavalry was used as Intelligence to scout an area before a battle ensued. Without Stuart there was no real way to gain needed intellegence concerning enemy numbers and fortifications. I agree with Ryan wholeheartedly in his book because Lee although being outnumbered at the start, didn't have a sophisticated intelligence network. Lee relied on scouts, the Cavalry and prisoners for much of his intelligence according to Ryan.
     
    leftyhunter likes this.
  14. cash

    cash Brev. Brig. Gen'l

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    24,745
    Location:
    Right here.
    Absolutely. The confederates came close to winning on Day 2 of Gettysburg. With a major defeat in southern Pennsylvania, the AotP would have no choice but to retreat. Only one way to do that, and that's south-by-southeast, so they could continue to cover Washington and Baltimore.
     
    PeterT likes this.
  15. Bee

    Bee 2nd Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,863
    [Grabs map] Via Baltimore Pike, maybe?
     
    cash likes this.
  16. 8thFlorida

    8thFlorida Private

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2016
    Messages:
    42
    Lee's intentions were mainly to weaken the will of the North in fighting a bloody war. Lee would fight until he could reach this goal but without enough support this would be impossible.
     
    War Horse likes this.
  17. Lost Cause

    Lost Cause Sergeant Major

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2014
    Messages:
    1,865
    The ANV didn't need to drive the AOP out of Pennsylvania.
     
  18. cash

    cash Brev. Brig. Gen'l

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    24,745
    Location:
    Right here.
    The Baltimore Pike was the primary route Meade would have used for a retreat.
     
    Bee likes this.
  19. War Horse

    War Horse 1st Lieutenant Forum Host Silver Patron Trivia Game Winner Regtl. Quartermaster Gettysburg 2016 Member of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    4,689
    Location:
    Lexington, SC
    He knew demoralization of the AoP would lead to political unease for Lincoln. Getting Lincoln out of office and provoking peace negotiations were his goal. With Lincoln or without!
     
    8thFlorida and Lost Cause like this.
  20. leftyhunter

    leftyhunter Captain

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    6,137
    Location:
    los angeles ca
    Didn't Meade have defensive works he could retreat to at Pipes Creek? Even if the AnV wins at Gettysburg they can't afford heavy casualties. The AnV already did so at Antietam and Chancellorsville.
    I am not arguing that Lee could not of won but could he of won a victory and still have enough men left over to defend Virginia?
    Or put another way Lee was undertaking an extremely high risk offensive and everything needs to go right. In war that is seldom the case. What would Lee's mathematical probability of success ( assuming it is quantifiable)
    Leftyhunter
     
    Last edited: Jan 13, 2017
  21. Rebforever

    Rebforever Captain

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    5,482
    Left,
    I really don't think Philly or Baltimore was in the plans. Even if General Lee had taken Gettysburg, that was all he could have done IMO.
     

(Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Controversy Dogs a Late Chief Justice's Statue Battlefield Preservation Wednesday at 5:38 PM
Oak Ridge Controversy - Order of Iverson's and O'Neal's Attacks on July 1 Battle of Gettysburg Jan 13, 2017
Olustee Monument Controversy today Battlefield Preservation Dec 21, 2016
is there really controversy regarding Lee's headquarters? Battle of Gettysburg Sep 16, 2016
More Rosencrans / Garfield controversy by Dave Powell The South & Western Theaters Apr 16, 2016

Share This Page