1. Welcome to the CivilWarTalk, a forum for questions and discussions about the American Civil War! Become a member today for full access to all of our resources, it's fast, simple, and absolutely free! If you aren't ready for that, try posting your question or comment as a guest!

The Battle of Hampton Roads: The Monitor Meets The Merrimack March 9, 1862

Discussion in 'Civil War History - The Naval War' started by KeyserSoze, Mar 9, 2012.

  1. KeyserSoze

    KeyserSoze 1st Lieutenant Forum Host

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Messages:
    4,606
    Location:
    Kansas City
    March 9, 1862 (Sunday)
    [​IMG]Washington was replete with panic as word of the previous day’s destruction reached its doorstep. The ravaging and ruin wrought by the ironclad CSS Virginia (once the USS Merrimack) at Hampton Roads was utterly astonishing. After nightfall, as the USS Congress smoldered, fixing its thick black smoke to the Hampton Roads horizon, and as several other ships were run aground, General Wool at Fortress Monroe reported the travesty to Secretary of War Edwin Stanton.1
    The note had to first travel to Baltimore before being telegraphed to Washington, leaving the citizens the entire night to be peacefully passed. But at 9:30am, the clacking of the wire reached Secretary Stanton in his office. With transcription in hand, he hurried to the White House and ruined Lincoln’s otherwise fine day with the news. Soon, Secretary of State Seward, Senator Orville Browning and General McClellan joined them.2
    [​IMG]During the meetings, Stanton paced the floor “like a caged lion,” and made brash, yet somehow believable, predictions of the terror to come. The fleet would be destroyed; Fortress Monroe laid under siege; McClellan’s Richmond Campaign delayed; the supply vessels traveling the Atlantic sunk; Washington and even New York bombarded sending the government officials running.3 Stanton was frantic, running from room to room, looking out windows towards the Potomac, seemingly to see if the Virginia was steaming up the river.
    After a quick meeting with the Washington Naval Yard Commander, John Dahlgren, belief between the various Cabinet members was split. Some, like Stanton, believed Washington would soon be shelled, while others, like Welles and Dahlgren, didn’t believe that the Virginia could even make it up the shallow Potomac. The President seemed to remain calm, but was still visibly affected by Stanton’s emotional panic.4
    [​IMG]
    While Welles and Stanton debated the entropy that would most assuredly come, in Hampton Roads, the CSS Virginia reappeared. To meet her was the USS Monitor, a smaller ironclad built specifically to best the Virginia.
    The Rebel ironclad, followed by several other ships, steamed out into Hampton Roads, hoping to destroy the USS Minnesota, which had run aground the previous day. Though stranded, the Minnesota was not helpless. When the Virginia drew to within a mile of her, she opened upon the craft, but did little damage. Some shells hit the Minnesota and a nearby steamer was blown up by Rebel artillery. A signal was sent to the Monitor that the Virginia was upon them.5
    [​IMG]In a garish display of bravado, the Virginia steamed towards the Monitor, eclipsing the Minnesota as she pulled along side the small Union ironclad. Both seemed to be saving their ammunition to make their shots count at close range.6
    The Monitor fired first, her shot hitting the Virginia at the waterline to no effect whatsoever. The Union ship stopped its engines and drifted alongside her opponent, a few yards in separation, as both fired as rapidly as they could into each other. In these initial volleys, the swiveling turret of the Monitor had been struck twice. There was some apprehension that, if struck, the turret would be frozen, its guns pointed in one direction only. Luckily for her, this was not the case.7
    [​IMG]Round after round bounced off the sides of the Virginia as the Rebels fired entire broadsides “with no more effect… than so many pebblestones thrown by a child.” The Monitor was smaller and faster than the Virginia. She sat very low in the water, with little more than her turret above the surface, which caused most of the Confederate shots to fly overhead.8
    Realizing the Virginia‘s armor to be too strong, the Monitor steamed as close as possible across her stern, hoping to disable her propeller. Though she couldn’t have missed her target by more than two feet, this plan also failed. The ships circled each other, turning and firing, turning and firing again. Once, the Rebel ship, finding that the Monitor was perpendicular to her, steamed as quickly as she could, hoping to ram the small Federal craft. Being lighter and quicker, however, the Monitor was able to escape with minimal damage.
    [​IMG]
    Before noon, the ammunition in the Monitor‘s turret was running low and she moved away from the Virginia to more safely replenish the supply from below. When the Rebel ironclad pulled to within ten yards, she fired again. This time, a shell struck the pilot house, where Captain John Worden was positioned. He was looking out a porthole as the shell hit close by. Though it caused the ship little damage, the force splintered the iron beam, sending metal into the Captain’s eyes, blinding and stunning him.
    [​IMG]The blast peeled back the roof of the pilot house, causing Worden to believe that it was seriously damaged. He ordered his ship to sheer off and found his second in command. With the Captain safe in his quarters, the Monitor returned to the battle, only to find the Virginia pulling away.9
    The Rebel ship was low on ammunition and, because of the receding tide, could get no closer to the grounded Minnesota so as to reduce her. It was clear that the Monitor, which had been hit at least twenty-three times, was not going away. It was decided to move her back to Sewell’s Point, where she had spent the previous night, under the protection of the Rebel batteries. The Monitor continued on her course, alongside the Minnesota.
    [​IMG]Though both sides claimed a victory (and for both, it was understandable), in reality, neither ship won the day. The Virginia was, however, neutralized and the Union fleet at Hampton Roads made relatively safe again. The blockade of Norfolk remained in place.10
    In Washington, panic had turned to pandemonium until 9pm, when Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles received the news he had been waiting for. Gustavus Fox, the Assistant Naval Secretary, was at Fortress Monroe and wired Welles that evening.
    The Virginia had retired. “The Monitor is uninjured and ready at any moment to repel another attack.”11
    Fortress Monroe would not be besieged; the Union fleet was now safe; McClellan’s campaign would continue to move (slowly) ahead; there would be no shelling of New York or Washington. Though the battle was a draw, it listed hard towards the side of the Union.

    http://civilwardailygazette.com/201...ampton-roads-the-monitor-meets-the-merrimack/
     

  2. (Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)
  3. donna

    donna Lt. Colonel Forum Host

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    12,228
    Location:
    Kentucky
    Thanks for posting.
     
  4. tmh10

    tmh10 Major

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Messages:
    7,778
    Location:
    Pipestem,WV
  5. donna

    donna Lt. Colonel Forum Host

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    12,228
    Location:
    Kentucky
    If anyone is near the Mariner Museum, I feel it is a must see. We have enjoyed two different times when we were in the area.
     
  6. ExNavyPilot

    ExNavyPilot 2nd Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2010
    Messages:
    2,978
    Location:
    Chesapeake, VA
    I organized a visit for my SUVCW Camp this last Saturday at the Monitor Center, which is a part of the Mariners Museum. The Monitor Center portion focuses on the Battle of Hampton roads and thus has exhibits on the building of, and fight between, the USS Monitor and CSS Virginia. As it was the 150th anniversary weekend of the battle, there were loads of special events going on throughout the weekend; lots of reenactors (Union and Confederate, Army and Navy, plus civilians), a cook-off between a Union Navy reenactor (using typical shipboard supplies and equipment) and a black plantation cook (using what she'd typically have available--not sure who won, but it all smelled great), etc. It was great to walk the deck of their Monitor mock-up and see Union sailors in period uniforms displaying different aspects of the ship and naval service. My Camp really enjoyed the tour, and I believe it's a must-see for any Civil War history buff visiting the area.

    As tmh10 says, the Maritime Museum's website has some good info on the history and the current day preservation efforts.
     

(Membership has it privileges! To remove this ad: Register NOW!)

Share This Page